Optimalisasi Peran Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban Dalam Memfasilitasi Pemberian Kompensasi Terhadap Korban Terorisme

  • Adinda Kusumanig Ratri Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  • Slamet Tri Wahyudi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Keywords: Terrorism, LPSK, Compensation

Abstract

This research aims to examine the role of the Witness and Victim Protection Agency (LPSK) as a facilitator in providing compensation for victims of terrorism and to analyze the implementation of compensation for victims of terrorism. This research is motivated by the fact that LPSK has not been optimal in exercising its authority as a facilitator in providing compensation to victims of terrorism. The research method used is normative juridical through statute approach, namely Terrorism Law and Victim Witness Protection Law and conceptual approach. The novelty in this research is to complement the studies conducted in previous studies that analyzed using Law Number 5 of 2018 concerning Eradication of the Crime of Theorism, in this study comparing the Terrorism Law with Law Number 31 of 2014 concerning Witness and Victim Protection. As well as examining the provision of compensation to Victims of Past Terrorism (KTML). Based on the results of the research, it is concluded that LPSK has not been optimal in exercising its authority as a facilitator of compensation for victims of terrorism. However, LPSK has a breakthrough mechanism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jurnal

Arif Hidayat and Zaenal Arifin, ‘Politik Hukum Legislasi Sebagai Socio-Equilibrium Di Indonesia’, Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 4.2 (2019), 133 <https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v4i2.1654>.

Frananta, Aldrian Bagus, 2019, Implementasi Pemenuhan Kompensasi Pada Korban Tindak Pidana Terorisme Dalam Prespekif Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 Tentang Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban, Jurnal Recidive, Vol. 8 No. 3, https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/recidive/article/view/47383/29618

Hendriana, Rani, 2016, Perlindungan Hukum Korban Tindak Pidana Terorisme: Antara Desiderata dan Realita, Jurnal Kosmik Hukum, Vol. 16 No. 1 https://jurnalnasional.ump.ac.id/index.php/KOSMIK/article/view/1273

Kukuh Sudarmanto, “Hukum Administrasi Dan Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia Yang Berkeadilan Sesuai Asas-Asas Pancasila”, Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 6.2 (2021), 409 <https://doi.org/10.33476/ajl.v3i1.838>.

Murthado, Achmad, 2020, Pemenuhan Ganti Kerugian Terhadap Anak Yang Menjadi Korban Tindak Pidana Pencablan, Jurnal HAK, Vol. 11 N0. 3, https://ejournal.balitbangham.go.id/index.php/ham/article/view/1346/pdf

Pandu Dewanto, “ Rekonstruksi Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Putusan Sengketa Perdata Berbasis Nilai Keadilan”, Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 5.2 (2020), 303–23.

Sugeng Riyadi, ‘Efektifitas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pengelolaan Dan Pemberdayaan Zakat Dalam Rangka Mengentaskan Kemiskinan’, Jurnal Usm Law Review, 2.1 (2019), 121 <https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v2i1.2262.

Susilaningtias, 2020, Perlindungan Terhadap Warga Negara Indonesia Sebagai Korban Tindak Pidana Terorisme Di Luar Negeri, Jurnal Al-Syakhsiyyah Journal of Law & Family Studies, Vol. 2 No. 2 https://jurnal.iainponorogo.ac.id/index.php/syakhsiyyah/article/view/2599

Widiatama, Hadi Mahmud, and Suparwi Suparwi, ‘Ideologi Pancasila Sebagai Dasar Membangun Negara Hukum Indonesia’, Jurnal Usm Law Review, 3.2 (2020), 310 <https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v3i2.2774>.

Buku

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Penelitian Hukum, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta Yogyakarta. 2013.

Soekanto, Soerjono, Sri Mamuji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif,Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2006.

Subihat, Ihat, Yuridiksi Kriminal Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Terorisme, Imperium, Yogyakarta, 2014.

Syafaat, Muchamad Ali, Tindak Pidana Teror Belenggu Baru Bagi Kebebasan, Imparsial, Jakarta, 2003.

Wahid, Abdul Et al., Kejahatan Terorisme Perspektif Agama,HAM,dan Hukum , Rafika Aditama, Jakarta, 2004.

Skripsi, Tesis, Distertasi, Online/World Wide Web dan Lain-Lain

Hukum Online. ‘Ini Hak WNI Yang Jadi Korban Terorisme Di Luar Negeri’ https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/ini-hak-wni-yang-jadi-korban-terorisme-di-luar-negeri-lt5f226379df52a/

Humas LPSK, ‘Penanganan Korban Samarinda Contoh Keberhasilan Penanganan Korban’ https://lpsk.go.id/berita/detailberita/2740 .

Ibnu Hariyanto, ‘Wiranto Beri Dana Kompensasi Bagi Korban Bom Thamrin-Kampung Melayu’, Detik.Com <https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4200067/wiranto-beri-dana-kompensasi-bagi-korban-bom-thamrin-kampung-melayu> .

Syarifah Citra Meidina,2020, Pemberian Kompensasi Bagi Korban Tindak Pidana Terorisme Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban (Analisis Putusan Nomor 140/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Jkt.Sel, Skripsi Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara, Medan.

Published
2024-08-31
How to Cite
Ratri, Adinda, and Slamet Wahyudi. 2024. “Optimalisasi Peran Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi Dan Korban Dalam Memfasilitasi Pemberian Kompensasi Terhadap Korban Terorisme”. Bacarita Law Journal 5 (1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.30598/bacarita.v5i1.12973.