Problematika Hak Eksekutorial Jaminan Fidusia: Perspektif Kepentingan Debitur

  • Wijaya Natalia Panjaitan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura
Keywords: Executory Rights, Fiduciary Guarantee, Debtor Interests

Abstract

A common problem in the enforcement of fiduciary guarantees is the seizure of collateral that violates consumer rights. Creditors often seize collateral without taking into account consumer rights protected by law. This can lead to disputes between the creditor and the debtor. The purpose of this research is to analyze the problems of fiduciary enforcement rights from the perspective of debtors' interests. The research method used is Normative Juridical Research with the type of library research. Debtors must check the credit agreement more carefully, in particular the clause "voluntary execution of the agreement"; if the clause is absent, the execution cannot be carried out unilaterally without any legal remedy declaring the debtor in default.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jurnal

Akhmad Yasin, 2020, “Dampak Jaminan Fidusia Kredit Kendaraan Bermotor yang Tidak Didaftarkan Terhadap Penerimaan Negara Bukan Pajak”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 17(4).

Riza Purnomo Hadi, Mekanisme Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Hal Debitur Wanprestasi, Dinamika, Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, Volume 26 Nomor 16, Agustus 2020, 1902-1914.

Sinambela, Sangga. 2022. “Implikasi Jaminan Fidusia Yang Tidak Didaftarkan Ke Kantor Pendaftaran Fidusia”. Yure Humano 4 (2):1-34.

Buku

Irwansyah, Penelitian Hukum (Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel), Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media, 2020.

Kosasih, Johannes Ibrahim, Anak Agung Istri Agung, dan Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi

Dewi, 2021, “Parate Eksekusi Fidusia (Polemik Kepastian Hukum dan Bisnis)”, Bandung, CV. Mandar Maju.

S. Djoni Gazali Dan Rachmadi Usman. Hukum Perbankan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2010.

Published
2024-08-31
How to Cite
Panjaitan, Wijaya. 2024. “Problematika Hak Eksekutorial Jaminan Fidusia: Perspektif Kepentingan Debitur”. Bacarita Law Journal 5 (1), 184-89. https://doi.org/10.30598/bacarita.v5i1.14764.