Solving the Crime of Petty Persecution Through the Restorative Justice Mechanism in a Progressive Legal Perspective

Samsul Hadi; Rina Rohayu Harun; Firzhal Arzhi Jiwantara

doi:10.30598/bacarita.v6i1.20652

Samsul Hadi Postgraduate, Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia.
Rina Rohayu Harun Postgraduate, Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia.
Firzhal Arzhi Jiwantara Postgraduate, Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30598/bacarita.v6i1.20652

Keywords: Criminal Offense, Restorative Justice, Progressive Law

Abstract

The objectives of this study are to examine and analyze the application of Restorative Justice in handling minor assault crimes at the Lombok Tengah District Police Station and to analyze the legal challenges faced in applying Restorative Justice to optimize its application in minor assault cases from a progressive legal perspective at the Lombok Tengah District Police Station. The research method used in this study is normative empirical law using a legal approach, conceptual approach, sociological approach, and case approach. The legal materials used in this study include primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study on the application of restorative justice in cases of minor assault within the Lombok Tengah Police Department were conducted in accordance with the mechanisms or rules outlined in Police Chief Regulation year 2021. In addition, the police offered reconciliation efforts to the victims and suspects based on cases that met the criteria for restorative justice and involved several other parties, such as religious leaders, traditional leaders, and community leaders, without any pressure, coercion, or intimidation from the Central Lombok Police, who acted as facilitators of minor assault cases. Second, the challenges faced in the implementation of restorative justice at the Lombok Tengah Police Station in resolving criminal cases of assault within the community include determining the value of compensation or restitution. Second, there are differing opinions between the victim and the victim's family regarding the peace efforts, where the victim does not wish to reconcile, while the victim's family desires reconciliation, considering long-term implications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alimuddin Alimuddin and others, "Rendahnya Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Kekerasan Anak Penyebab Meningkatnya Kasus Kekerasan Seksual", JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan 5, no. 7 (2022): 2186–2192.

Arpandi Karjono et al., “Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif Justice Dalam Hukum Pidana Berbasis Kearifan Lokal,” Jurnal Usm Law Review 7, no. 2 (2025): 1035–1050.

Devan Septyan Prayoga, Taufiqurrahman, and Nuryanto A. Daim, "Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Korban Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual Di Perguruan Tinggi Dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif Indonesia", Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Wijaya Putra 1, no. 2 (2023): 265–72.

Hiro R. R. Tompodung and others, "Kajian Yuridis Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Yang Mengakibatkan Kematian", Lex Crimen 71, no. 1 (2021): 63–71.

I Made Tambir, "Pendekatan Restorative Justice Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Di Tingkat Penyidikan", Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) 8, no. 4 (2019): 549–574.

Ida Made Oka Wijaya, "Restorative Justice Dalam Tinjauan Hukum Progresif: Eksistensi Dan Implikasi", Indonesia Berdaya, 3, no. 3 (2022): 707–718.

Johnny Ibrahim, Teori Dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Malamg: Bayumedia Publishing, 2013.

Kuat Puji Prayitno, "Restorative Justice Untuk Peradilan Di Indonesia (Perspektif Yuridis Filosofis Dalam Penegakan Hukum In Concreto)", Jurnal Dinamikka Hukum 12, no. 3 (2012): 407–420.

Michael Wenzel, "Retributive and Restorative Justice", Jurnal Law and Human Behavior 3, no. 5 (2022): 1–15.

Afina Anindita and others, "Implementasi Prinsip Restorative Justice Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Pada Tingkat Penyidikan ( Studi Kasus Di Polresta Surakarta )", UNES Law Review 6, no. 3 (2024): 8539–53.

R Rahaditya and others, "Analisis Pro Dan Kontra Restorative Justice Dalam Penyelenggaraan Sistem Keadilan Di Indonesia", Jurnal Kewarganegaraan 7, no. 2 (2023): 2157–68.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2011.

Poerwadarminta, Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia, Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 2003.

Rahmawati, Peluang Dan Tantangan Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia, Jakarta: ICJR, 2022.

Renita Dharma Pratiwi and others, "Kendala Penerapan Prinsip Restorative Justice Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Anak", Jurnal Lex Suprema 1. no, 2 (2019), 1–19.

Romli Atmasasmita, Teori Hukum Integratif Rekonstruksi Terhadap Teori Hukum Pembangunan Dan Teori Hukum Progresif, Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2012.

Satjipto Rahardjo, Hukum Progresif : Sebuah Sintesa Hukum Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2009.

Soritua Agung Tampubolon et al, "Penghentian Penuntutan Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Berdasarkan Pendekatan Keadilan Restoratif", Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review 2, no. 3 (2023): 193–202.

Sukardi, Konsep Penyidikan Restorative Justice, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2020.

Susana Andi Meyrina, “Restorative Justice Dalam Peradilan Anak Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No.11 Tahun 2012,” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum DE JURE 17, no. 11 (2017): 92–107.

W. Bawengan Gerson, Hukum Pidana Di Dalam Teori Dan Praktek, Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 1979.

Widyawati Boediningsih and Novi Prameswari Regina Dermawan, "Perkembangan Ham Di Indonesia Dan Problematikanya", Education : Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Dan Pendidikan 3, no. 2 (2023): 77–87.

Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP; Penyidikan Dan Penuntutan Edisi Kedua, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012.

Yeti S Hasan, "Jurnal Hukum Non Diskriminatif Jurnal Hukum Non Diskriminatif’" 2, no. 1 (2023), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.56854/jhdn.v2i1.226.

Yinzhi Shen, "Development of Restorative Justice in China: Theory and Practice", International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy 5 , no 4 (2016): 76–86.