Disharmony of Regulations as a Normative Impact of the Enactment of the New Criminal Code

Disharmoni Regulasi Sebagai Dampak Normatif Berlakunya Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Baru

  • Raymundus Loin Faculty of Law, Universitas Panca Bhakti, Pontianak, Indonesia.
  • Marlina Samosir Faculty of Law, Universitas Panca Bhakti, Pontianak, Indonesia.
Keywords: Disharmony, Regulation, Normative Impact, New Criminal Code

Abstract

The enactment of the new Criminal Code marks a major change in the Indonesian criminal law system. However, this reform must contend with various existing sectoral laws, thus creating the potential for regulatory disharmony due to differences in regulations and overlapping norms. This study aims to determine the occurrence of regulatory disharmony as a normative impact of the enactment of the new Criminal Code in relation to various existing sectoral laws in Indonesia and to determine the overlapping regulations and application of the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali between the new Criminal Code and specific laws contributing to the emergence of regulatory disharmony in the national criminal law system. This study uses normative juridical legal research, where the data is sourced from secondary data. The research results indicate that regulatory disharmony as a normative impact of the enactment of the new Criminal Code occurs because a number of its criminal provisions are not fully aligned with existing sectoral laws. Differences in regulations, the scope of offenses, and the construction of sanctions give rise to overlapping norms and unclear application of the lex specialis principle, thus creating legal uncertainty in the practice of criminal law enforcement in Indonesia. The overlapping regulations between the new Criminal Code and special laws, coupled with the unclear application of the lex specialis derogat legi generali principle, are significant factors triggering regulatory disharmony. Uncertainty in determining which norms should be prioritized in dual-regulated offenses leads to differences in interpretation among law enforcement, opens up room for inconsistent decisions, and disrupts legal certainty in the national criminal law system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andi Hamzah, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2015.

Barda Nawawi Arief, Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Kencana, 2014.

Hans Kelsen, Pure Theory of Law, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2005.

Lawrence M. Friedman, The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective, New York: Russell Sage, 1975.

Maria Farida Indrati, Ilmu Perundang-Undangan: Jenis, Fungsi, dan Materi Muatan, Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2007.

Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief, Teori-Teori Pemidanaan, Bandung: Alumni, 1992.

Muladi, Politik Hukum Pidana, Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2002.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2013.

Philipus M. Hadjon, Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia, Surabaya: Yuridika, 2002.

Roeslan Saleh, Segi Lain Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Aksara Baru, 1983.

Romli Atmasasmita, Rekonstruksi Asas dan Teori Pemidanaan Indonesia, Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2019.

Sudikno Mertokusumo, Penemuan Hukum: Sebuah Pengantar, Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2010.

Published
2026-04-30
How to Cite
Loin, Raymundus, and Marlina Samosir. 2026. “Disharmony of Regulations As a Normative Impact of the Enactment of the New Criminal Code”. Bacarita Law Journal 6 (2), 237-46. https://doi.org/10.30598/bacarita.v6i2.24195.