Legalitas Penetapan Kerugian Keuangan Negara Oleh Aparat Pengawas Internal Pemerintah (APIP) Sebagai Dasar Memeriksa Perkara Korupsi

  • Maria Rumihin Fakultas Hukum Program Studi Diluar Kampus Utama Universitas Pattimura
  • Salmon Eliazer Marthen Eliazer Marthen Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura
  • Deassy Jacomina Anthoneta Hehanussa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura
Keywords: Authority, Law, Corruption

Abstract

To prevent and eradicate criminal acts of corruption in the bureaucracy of government institutions and prevent errors and irregularities in the implementation of duties by apparatus in the government bureaucracy, the existence of the government internal supervision apparatus (APIP) is considered very important to conduct internal supervision of government apparatus in carrying out government duties. However, the authority given by law to APIP is often not in line with APH (Law Enforcement Officers) often use the results of the State loss calculation report by APIP as a basis for prosecuting someone suspected of committing a Criminal Act of Corruption. This type of research is normative juridical. The type of research is descriptive-analytical. The source of legal materials uses primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Techniques for collecting legal materials through literature study and qualitative analysis of legal materials. The results showed that the only institution that has the authority to calculate and determine State Financial Losses is the Audit Board by attribution given by the Constitution Therefore, every charge committed by APH (Law Enforcement Officer) must be null and void or can be canceled because it is not in line with existing regulations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Achmad Ali, Menguak Tabir Hukum, Kencana, Jakarta, 2015.

Adolop Seleky, Salmon Eliazer Marthen Nirahua and Patrick Corputty. 2022. “Kewenangan Penetapan Kerugian Keuangan Negara Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi”. PATTIMURA Legal Journal 1 (1), 44-59. https://doi.org/10.47268/pela.v1i1.5928.

D H Koesoehatmadja, Pengantar Hukum Tata Usaha Negara Indonesia, Alumni, Bandung, 1984.

E.Utrecht. 1986, Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Negara Indonesia. Pustaka Tinta Mas. Surabaya, 1986.

H.M. Soerya Respationo, “Penyelenggaraan Pemerintah yang Bersih Menuju Zona Integritas Wilayah, Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2003.

Ishaq. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum. Cet. I. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.2008.

Jazim Hamidi, Revolusi Hukum Indonesia: Makna, Kedudukan, dan Implikasi Hukum Naskah Proklamasi 17 Agustus 1945 dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan RI, Konstitusi Press & Citra Media, Yogyakarta, 2006.

Marwan Mas, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Ghalia Indonesia, Bogor, 2003.

Moh. Aperinato, Peran dan Fungsi Inspektorat, Ganta Pres, Jakarta 2011.

O. C. Kaligis, Kerugian Negara Dalam Perkara Korupsi BPK Vs BPKP, Yarsif Watampo, Jakarta, 2012.

R. Soeroso Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Sinar Grafika Jakarta, 2014.

S. F. Marbun dan Mahfud MD, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Administrasi Negara, Liberty, Yogyakarta, 1987.

Soedjono Dirdjosisworo, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Raja Grafindo Tinggi, Jakarta, 2010.

Soejono Soekanto dan Sri Mamuji, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, UI Press, Jakarta, 1986.

Published
2023-05-19
How to Cite
Rumihin, Maria, Salmon Eliazer Marthen, and Deassy Hehanussa. 2023. “Legalitas Penetapan Kerugian Keuangan Negara Oleh Aparat Pengawas Internal Pemerintah (APIP) Sebagai Dasar Memeriksa Perkara Korupsi”. Bacarita Law Journal 3 (2), 103-16. https://doi.org/10.30598/bacarita.v3i2.8502.