The Influence of Owner Characteristics on the Utilization of Yards in Planned and Unplanned Settlements

Alfred J Sutrisno; Ani P Astuti

doi:10.30598/jbdp.2023.19.1.21

Alfred J Sutrisno Program Studi Agroteknologi, Fakultas Pertanian dan Bisnis, Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Jalan Diponegoro No.52-60, Kota Salatiga 50711, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
Ani P Astuti Program Studi Agroteknologi, Fakultas Pertanian dan Bisnis, Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Jalan Diponegoro No.52-60, Kota Salatiga 50711, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30598/jbdp.2023.19.1.21

Keywords: owner characteristics, settlements, visual, yards

Abstract

Yard is important for the community of Salatiga City. Salatiga City has two types of settlements, namely planned and unplanned settlements. The utilization of yards in both types of settlements differs. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the influence of yard owner characteristics on yard utilization, which was assessed by the visual condition of yards in planned and unplanned settlements. Yard owner characteristics were assessed by length of stay, age, and occupation. The sample selection method used was purposive sampling, with a total of 35 respondents. 10 respondents were from planned settlements and 25 respondents from unplanned settlements. The data analysis method used was Scenic Beauty Estimation (SBE), which was used to assess visual quality. Visual quality was divided into three categories: low, medium, and high. Subsequently, the Kruskall Wallis test was used to examine the influence of owner characteristics on yard utilization. The results showed that out of 10 yards in planned settlements, two yards were in the high category, five yards in the medium category, and three yards in the low category. Meanwhile, in unplanned settlements, out of 25 yards, 11 yards were in the high category, nine yards in the medium category, and five yards in the low category. The owner characteristic that influenced yard utilization was the owner occupation, which was seen from the Asymp. Sig. value <0.05, which was 0.049.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arifin, H. S., Munandar, A., Mugnisjah, W. Q., Budiarti, T., Arifin, N. H. S., & Pramukanto, P. (2007). Homestead plot survey on Java. Research Report. Department of Landscape Architecture & Rural Development Institute (RDI) Seattle-USA.

Ashari, S., & Purwantini, T. B. (2012). Proteksi dan prospek pemanfaatan lahan pekarangan untuk mendukung ketahanan pangan. Bogor: Pusat Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian. Forum Penelitian Agroekonomi, 30(1), 13-30. https://doi.org/10.21082/fae.v30n1.2012.13-30

Budiyono, D. (2015). Evaluasi estetika lingkungan berdasarkan persepsi di welcome area kampus institut pertanian bogor. Jurnal Buana Sains, 15(1), 19-28. ISSN 2527-5720.

Daniel, T. C., & Boster, R. S. (1976). Measuring landscape aesthetics: Scenic beauty estimation method. USDA Forest Service. New Jersey. 66p.

Feriatin. (2017). Keanekaragaman tanaman pekarangan dan pemanfatannya untuk mendukung ketahanan pangan Kecamatan Wakorumba Selatan. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia, 22(2), 99-107. ISSN 2443-3462.

Galhena, D. H., Russell, F., & Karim, M. M. (2013). Home gardens: A promising approach to enhance household food security and wellbeing. Agriculture and Food Security, 2(8), 2-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/2048-7010-2-8

Irwan, S. N., Rogomulyo, R., & Trisnowati, S. (2018). Pemanfaatan pekarangan melalui pengembangan lanskap produktif di Desa Mangunan, Kabupaten Bantul Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia, 23(2), 148-157. ISSN 2443-3462.

Irwan, S. N. R., & Sarwadi, A. (2015). Lanskap pekarangan produktif di permukiman perkotaan dalam mewujudkan lingkungan binaan berkelanjutan. Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Jakarta

Khakhim, N. (2008). Analisis preferensi visual lanskap pesisir Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta untuk pengembangan pariwisata pesisir menuju pada pengelolaan wilayah pesisir berkelanjutan. Forum Geografi, 22(1), 44-59. ISSN 2460-3945.

Kostof, S. (1991). The City Shaped. London. Inggris.

Marshall, E. J. P., & Moonen, A. C. (2002). Field margins in Northern Europe: Their functions and interactions with agriculture. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 89, 5–21.

Mubarok, J., Murtini, T. W., & Suprapti, A. (2019). Pola permukiman Pesantren Darul ‘Ulum Peterongan Jombang pada masa kejayaan di Tahun 1975. Arsitektura, 17(2), 185-194. ISSN 2580-2976.

Mukarlina, Linda, R., & Nurlaila, N. (2014). Keanekaragaman jenis tanaman pekarangan di Desa Pahauman Kecamatan Sengah Temila Kabupaten Landak, Kalimantan Barat. Jurnal Saintifika, 16(1), 51-62. ISSN 2502-2768.

Van Heezik, Y. M., Dickinsonb, K. J. M., Freeman, C., & Porterc, S. (2014). Native and exotic woody vegetation communities in domestic gardens in relation to social and environmental factors. Ecology and Society, 19(4), 17. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26269663

Viljoen, A., Bohn, K., & Howe, J. (2005). Continous Productive Urban Landscapes (CPULs). Oxford (EN): Burlington: Architectural Prees.