PROSES BERPIKIR KREATIF GURU DALAM MENDESAIN TUGAS MATEMATIK

Syamsu Alam; Taufiq Taufiq; Widya Putri Ramadhani

doi:10.30598/jpmunpatti.v4.i2.p70-75

Syamsu Alam Cokroaminoto Palopo
Taufiq Taufiq Cokroaminoto Palopo
Widya Putri Ramadhani Universitas Pattimura

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30598/jpmunpatti.v4.i2.p70-75

Abstract

Students have different backgrounds and abilities. Therefore, teachers must be good at choosing and giving math assignments to their students. The purpose of this study was to reveal the creative thinking process of teachers in designing math assignments. The participants in this study were elementary school teachers in Pangkep district, South Sulawesi based on their functional position (focusing on intermediate teachers). This study used a qualitative approach, with data collection methods using task-based interviews. From the results obtained, we found the subject's thinking process followed the sequence of stages of synthesizing ideas, constructing ideas, planning the application of ideas, and applying ideas.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

As’ari, A. R. 2009. Penugasan Belajar yang Tepat untuk Membantu Siswa Belajar Matematika Secara Bermakna. MIPA Dan Pembelajarannya, 33(1).

Breen, S., & O’Shea, A. (2021). Mathematical thinking and task design. Irish Mathematical Society Bulletin, 66, 39–49. https://doi.org/10.33232/bims.0066.39.49

Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Wood, T. 1990. Classrooms as learning environments for teachers and Researchers. In RB Davis, CA Maher, & N. Noddings (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving (pp. 117-148). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Jones, K., & Pepin, B. (2016). Research on mathematics teachers as partners in task design. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(2–3), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857016-9345-z

Lee, K. H. (2017). Convergent and divergent thinking in task modification: A case of Korean prospective mathematics teachers’ exploration. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49(7), 995–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0889-x

Liliasari, 2005. Membangun Keterampilan Berpikir Manusia Indonesia melalui Pendidikan Sains. Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar Tetap dalam Ilmu Pendidikan IPA. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

NCTM. 2000. Six Principles for School Mathematics. In National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 1–6). Retrieved from http://www.nctm.org/uploadedFiles/Math_Standards/12752_exec_pssm.pdf

NCTM. 2015. Mathematical Understanding for Secondary Teaching: A Framework and Classroom-Based Situations. (M. K. Heid, P. S. Wilson, & G. W. Blume, Eds.). Charlotte, NC.: Information Age Publishing, INC.

Perkins, D. N., & Swartz, R. J. 1990. “The Nine Basics of Teaching Thinking.” Skyligh Publishing 2:53–69.

Silver, E. A., & Smith, M. S. 1997. “Implementing Reform in the Mathematics Classroom: Creating Mathematical Discourse Communities.” In Reform in Math and Science Education: Issues for Teachers. Columbus, OH: Eisenhower National Clearing House for Mathematics and Science Education.

Stein, M. K., & Lane, S. 1996. Instructional tasks and the development of student capacity to think and reason: An analysis of the relationship between teaching and learning in a reform mathematics project. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2(1), 50-80.

Sullivan, P., Clarke, P., Clarke, D. 2013. Teaching with Tasks for Effective Mathematics Learning. Springer New York Heidelberg Dordrecht London.

Suryadi, D. 2003. Pengembangan Kemampuan Berpikir Matematik Tingkat Tinggi. Kajian Mandiri I. UPI Bandung: Tidak di terbitkan.

Taufiq, dkk. (2023). Exploring What Teacher's Decision-Making in Designing Mathematical Assignments?: Case Studies in Beginner. IJORER: International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 4(4), 497-513.

Van Zoest, L. R., Enyart, A. 1998. Discourse of course: Engaging genuine mathematical conversations. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 4(3), 150-158.

Widodo, S. 2013. Keterkaitan Antara Berpikir Kreatif Dan Produk Kreatif Guru Matematika Smp Dalam Membuat Soal Matematika Kontekstual. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 16(1), 97-109

Bibliography

Breen, S., & O'Shea, A. (2021). Mathematical Thinking and Task Design. Irish Mathematical Society Bulletin, 66, 39-49. doi:https://doi.org/10.33232/bims.0066.39.49

Henningsen, M., & Stein, M. K. (1997). Mathematical Task and Student Cognition: Classroom-based Factors taht Support and Inhibit High-level Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning. Journal for Reserch in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 524-549.

Jones, K., & Pepin, B. (2016). Research on Mathematics Teachers as Partners in Task Design. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(2-3), 105-121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857016-9345-z

Smith, J. A. (2004). Reflecting on the Development of Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis and Its Contribution to Qualitative Research in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 39-54.

Stein, M. K., & Lane, S. (1996). Instructional Tasks and The Delopment of Student Capacity to Think and Reason: An Analysis of The Relationship Between Teaching and Learning in A Reform Mathematics Project. Education Research and Evaluation, 2(1), 50-80.

Stylianides, G. J., & Stylianides, A. J. (2008). Proof in School Mathematics: Insights from Psychological Research into Students' Ability for Deductive Reasoning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(2), 103-133.

Sullivan, P., Clarke, P., & Clarke, D. (2013). Teching with Task for Effective Mathematics Learning. New York , Heidelberg Dordrecht , London: Spinger.

Taufiq, & dkk. (2023). Exploring What Teacher's Decision-Making in Designing Mathematical Assignments?: Case Studies in Beginner. IJORER: International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 4(4), 497-513.