KARAKTERISTIK DOSEN IDEAL BERDASARKAN PERSEPSI CALON GURU MATEMATIKA

  • Lusia Greitha Ernawati Universitas Musamus
  • Maria Fransina Veronica Ruslau Universitas Musamus
  • Khumaeroh Dwi Nur'aini Universitas Musamus
Keywords: conjoint analysis, student perceptions, ideal lecturers

Abstract

This research was conducted to obtain lecturer profiles according to student perceptions. The attributes used in this research are discipline, authority, learning methods, material delivery, assignments, material review, remedial, and assessment which will then be analyzed using conjoint analysis. The conjoint analysis process with the help of SPSS 20 produces 16 attribute combinations which will then be distributed to students in the form of a questionnaire for assessment. Based on student assessments, the combination of attribute levels that has the highest preference value is lecturers who are disciplined in arriving on time, authoritative as individual lecturers, using conventional learning methods, delivering material using pure mathematics, lecturers who give assignments after being checked and then return them, carry out reviewing material before the exam, lecturers who carry out remediation, and also lecturers who provide objective assessments. The results of the conjoint analysis show that the attribute that has the highest relative importance value is reviewing the material with the attribute level that has the highest usefulness value, namely the lecturer reviewing the material before the exam. Next, successively based on the importance of the attributes, namely the attributes of discipline, tasks, remedial, authority, assessment, learning methods and delivery of material. Characteristics of lecturers in the Mathematics Education Department that students like are lecturers who, in the learning process, always review the material before taking exams; arrive on time for lectures; when giving assignments it is corrected, graded and then returned to the student; conducting re-exams for students who have not completed them or wish to improve their grades; and of course a lecturer must have authority as a lecturer; then in carrying out the assessment, the lecturer gives an assessment to the student objectively without considering the closeness of the lecturer to the student or other factors that influence the lecturer's assessment of the student; students prefer lecturers who teach without having to use techniques according to the lecturer's professionalism, the important thing is that the material presented can be understood by students; as well as delivering material using pure mathematics which can deepen students' mathematical knowledge

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bimo, W. A. (2016). Hubungan Motivasi Kerja dan Disiplin Kerja Dosen dengan Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Di Universitas IBN Khaldun Bogor. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 11(1), 5–15.

Haddar, G. Al, Kuswandi, S., Silitonga, D. O. S. B. N., Iwan, Nur’aini, I. I. P. K. D., Gaspersz, N. S. S., & Yurfia. (2023). Pengantar Microteaching (1st Editio, Vol. 01). Yayasan Kita Menulis.

Hutapea, P., & Thoha, N. (2008). Kompetensi Komunikasi Plus : Teori, Desain, Kasus dan Penerapan untuk HR dan Organisasi yang Dinami. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Izzati, N. (2015). Pengaruh Penerapan Program Remedial Dan Pengayaan Melalui Pembelajaran Tutor Sebaya Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa. Eduma : Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v4i1.20

Kurniati, N., Baidowi, B., & Hikmah, N. (2018). Persepsi Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika Terhadap Kinerja Dosen Dalam Proses Perkuliahan. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 13(1), 32–36. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v13i1.471

Nur’aini, K. D., & Pagiling, S. L. (2020). Analisis Pedagogical Content Knowledge Guru Matematika Sekolah Menengah Pertama Ditinjau Dari Segi Gender. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 9(4), 1036. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v9i4.3171

Nur’aini, K. D., & Ruslau, M. F. . (2019). Mathematics Teacher Performance Based On Student’s Perception and Learning Achievement By Applying Structural Equation Modeling.

Nur’aini, K. D., Ruslau, M. F. V., & Palobo, M. (2019). Mathematics teacher performance based on student’s perception and learning achievement by applying structural equation modeling approach. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 343(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/343/1/012237

Nur’aini, K. D., & Ruslau, M. F. V. (2020). Kinerja Guru Matematika Berdasarkan Persepsi dan Kompetensi Siswa SMP Di Kota Merauke. Journal of Honai Math, 3(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.30862/jhm.v3i1.106

Palobo, M., Pagiling, S. L., & Nur’aini, K. D. (2020). Analysis of Effect of learning Style on Mathematics Learning Outcomes. 473(Icss), 484–488. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201014.106

Prayitno. (2009). Dasar Teori dan Praksis Pendidikan. Grasindo.

Saleh, S., & Nasrullah, M. (2019). Pengaruh Disiplin Mengajar Dosen Terhadap Motivasi Belajar Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran UNM. Seminar Nasional LP2M UNM, 45–48.

Simamora, B. (2014). Pengaruh Disiplin dan Kompetensi Dosen Terhadap Prestasi Mahasiswa Program Studi Penerbitan. Jurnal Publipreneur, 98–113.

Suprihatiningrum, J. (2016). Guru Profesional: Pedoman Kinerja, Kualifikasi, & Kompetensi Guru. Ar-Ruzz Media.

Warti, R., & Lestari, N. (2017). Preferensi Mahasiswa Terhadap Mata Kuliah Statistika Matematika Menggunakan Analisis Konjoin. Prosiding SI MaNIs (Seminar Nasional Integrasi Matematika Dan Nilai Islami, 414–418.

Yusup, F. (2018). Uji Validitas dan Reabilitas Instrumen Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jurnal Tarbiyah, 17–23. https://doi.org/10.21831/jorpres.v13i1.12884.

Published
2024-05-31
How to Cite
Ernawati, L., Ruslau, M., & Nur’aini, K. (2024). KARAKTERISTIK DOSEN IDEAL BERDASARKAN PERSEPSI CALON GURU MATEMATIKA. Jurnal Magister Pendidikan Matematika (JUMADIKA), 6(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.30598/jumadikavol6iss1year2024page1-6
Section
Articles