Problematika Implementasi Eksekusi Harta Pailit Oleh Kreditur Separatis Dan Kurator Perspektif Keadilan
Abstract
When executing bankruptcy assets begins, it is important to remember that separatist creditors as holders of material guarantees have a special position to execute themselves on bankrupt assets which are the object of their material guarantees. In a bankruptcy case, there are actually 2 (two) parties who can apply for execution, namely the Curator and the separatist creditor. This is the problematic implementation of bankruptcy law in Indonesia regarding bankruptcy assets belonging to bankruptcy debtors. As for the problem being studied is: "how is the legal analysis related to the implementation of the execution of debtor bankruptcy assets by Separatist Creditors and Curators from a justice perspective?". The aim of this research is to find solutions to problems objectively. The research method used is normative juridical research which is descriptive-qualitative in nature, by examining legal materials, both primary legal materials and secondary legal materials through related literature studies. The analysis used in this research is qualitative analysis to answer the problems studiedred.
Downloads
References
Dewi Amrih Suci, Ivada, dan Herowati Poesoko. Hukum Kepailitan (Kedudukan dan Hak Kreditur Separatis atas Benda Jaminan Debitur Pailit. Yogyakarta: Laksbang Pressindo, 2016.
Irianto, Catur. “Penerapan asas kelangsungan usaha dalam penyelesaian perkara kepailitan dan penundaan kewajiban pembayaraan utang (pkpu).” Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 4, no. 3 (2015): 399–418.
Lontoh, Rudy. Penyelesaian Utang Melalui Pailit atau Penundaan Kewajiban pembayaran Utang,. Edisi 1. Bandung: Alumni, 2001.
Remy Syaideini, Sutan. Sutan Remy Syaideini, Hukum Kepailitan, Memahami Faillissementsverodening Juncto Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1998. Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti, 2002.
S Sastrawidjaja, Man. Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Bandung: Alumni, 2006.
Saija, Ronald, dan Michael Nussy. Hukum Kepailitan - Kreditur Dalam Pailit,. Edisi 1. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2020.
Sidabutar, Lambok Marisi Jakobus. “Hukum Kepailitan dalam Eksekusi Harta Benda Korporasi sebagai Pembayaran Uang Pengganti.” Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi 5, no. 2 (2019): 75–86.
Situmorang, Morgan. “Tinjauan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1998 tentang Penetapan Perpu Nomor 1 Tahun 1998 menjadi Undang-Undang.” Majalah Hukum Nasional, 1999.
Sularto, Mr. “Perlindungan Hukum Kreditur Separatis dalam Kepailitan.” Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 24, no. 2 (2012): 241–53.
Copyright (c) 2024 Ronald Saija (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
