Implikasi Hukum Kreditur Menangkal Pailit Yang Diajukan Debitur Berdasarkan Putusannya Nomor 33/PAILIT/2004/PN. NIAGA.JKT.PST

  • Ronald Saija Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
  • Pieter Radjawane Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Keywords: Protection, Creditors, Bankruptcy

Abstract

This study aims to understand how the settlement of bankrupt assets is conducted concerning debtors filing for their bankruptcy. The case begins with the debtor's inability to repay their debts, leading them to declare bankruptcy. This research employs a normative juridical approach, prioritizing library research and document analysis to obtain secondary legal materials. The normative approach examines legal regulations related to the issue of legal protection for creditors concerning bankruptcy filed by debtors. Meanwhile, the juridical approach is used to analyze legal facts to address issues related to the protection of creditors' rights in connection with debtors declaring bankruptcy. The Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations Act (UUKPKPU), which replaced the previous Bankruptcy Act (UUK), remains insufficient in fully protecting creditors' rights. In the dispute involving PT. Golden Adishoes, there is a lack of clarity regarding the full repayment of debts, particularly when the bankrupt debtor's assets are insufficient to settle all their obligations. This situation implicitly forces creditors to accept that the bankrupt debtor cannot fully repay their debts. Furthermore, there is no explicit guidance or solutions provided for creditors to take action before the bankruptcy petition is filed by the debtor in the Commercial Court.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Budisastra. “Aspek Hukum Dalam Kepailitan,” 2013. http://budisastra.info/home.

G. Tumbuan, Fred. Komentar atas Catatan Terhadap Putusan Nomor 14 K/N/2004 Jo. Nomor 18/Pailit/2004/P. Niaga/Jakarta Pusat, 2005.

Gessner, Volkmar, Barbara Rhode, Gerhard Strate, dan Klaus A. Ziegert. “Three functions of bankruptcy law: The west german case.” Law and Society Review, 1978, 499–543.

Hartini, Rahayu. Edisi Revisi Hukum Kepailitan. Malang: UMM Press, 2007.

Hernowo, Tri. Sekilas Catatan tentang Hukum Kepailitan, Dalam: Valerie Selvie Sinaga (ed), Analisa Putusan Kepailitan pada Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta. Jakarta: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik Atmajaya, 2015.

Muhammad, Suwarsono. Strategi Penyehatan Perusahaan Generik dan Kontekstual. Yogyakarta: Ekonisia, 2001.

Redjeki Hartono, Sri. Kapita Selekta Hukum Ekonomi. Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju, 2000.

Remy Sjahdeini, Sutan. Hukum Kepailitan (Memahami Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan, Cetakan IV. Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti, 2010.

Siregar, Mustafa. “Efektifitas Perundang-Undangan Perbankan dan Lembaga Keuangan Lainnya, dengan Penelitian di Wilayah Kodya Medan.” Disertasi, Universitas Sumatera Utara, 1990.

Subhan, Hadi. Hukum kepailitan (Prinsip, Norma, dan Praktik di Pradilan). Jakarta: Kencana Pranada Media Group, 2012.

Tumbuan, Fred BG. “Mencermati Makna Debitor, Kreditor dan Utang Berkaitan Dengan Kepailitan.” Dalam: Yuhassarie, Emmy.(ed.), Undang-Undang Kepailitan dan Perkembangannya, 2005.

Waluyo, Bernadete. Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, Cetakan Pertama. Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju, 1999.

Widjanarko. “Dampak Implementasi Undang-Undang Kepailitan Terhadap Sektor Perbankan,.” Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, Yayasan Pengembangan Hukum Bisnis 8 (1999): 73.

Yuhassarie, Emmy. “Pemikiran Kembali Hukum Kepailitan Indonesia.” Jakarta: Pusat Pengkajian Hukum, 2005.

Published
2024-11-22
How to Cite
Saija, R., & Radjawane, P. (2024). Implikasi Hukum Kreditur Menangkal Pailit Yang Diajukan Debitur Berdasarkan Putusannya Nomor 33/PAILIT/2004/PN. NIAGA.JKT.PST. KANJOLI Business Law Review, 2(2), 82-97. https://doi.org/10.47268/kanjoli.v2i2.16295

Most read articles by the same author(s)