Eksistensi Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Sebagai Jaminan Cross Collateral
Abstract
The freedom to impose more than one mortgage as stated in Article 5 of the Mortgage Right Act is a gap in the misconception of guarantee execution. The existence of more than one debtor or more than one creditor but still on the same collateral motorcycle taxi requires a strict application of clauses in the agreement.The purpose of this study is to examine the existence of mortgage rights as cross-collateral guarantees. This research was carried out in a normative juridical manner, using library data as secondary data for the study of rules and norms in law. The conclusion obtained from this study is that the imposition of mortgage rights can be carried out through two series of activities, namely the granting of mortgage rights and registration of mortgage rights. The freedom to be burdened with more than one mortgage to guarantee more than one debt is waived by Article 5 UUHT. The history of recording more than one mortgage will be recorded on the Mortgage Certificate (SHT) with the mention of the first/second/third rank and so on. The execution of mortgage rights can be carried out by Article 20 UUHT, namely based on the execution parate in Article 6 UUHT, Based on the executorial title in Article 14 and voluntary sale by agreement of both parties Article 20 paragraph (2). Execution constraints are still encountered in practice, especially in the imposition of more than one mortgage. The meaning of the priority principle is a misconception of the appropriate agency. In order to minimize execution constraints, the use of the cross-collateral clause is a way for the application of the creditor prudence principle. The use of cross-collateral which is equipped with cross-default and confirmed in the collateral agreement for collateral registration is then carried out.
Downloads
References
Hanitijo, Ronny. “Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Dan Jurimetri.” Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 1990.
Hielmy, Muhammad Irfan. “Penerapan Prinsip Cross Default Dan Cross Collateral Pada Perjanjian Kredit Dengan Agunan Hak Atas Tanah (Studi PT. Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero) Tbk.).” Indonesian Notary 2, no. Vol 2, No 1 (2020): Jurnal Notary (2020). http://notary.ui.ac.id/index.php/home/article/view/682/198.
Jayanti, Offi, and Agung Darmawan. “Pelaksanaan Lelang Tanah Jaminan Yang Terikat Hak Tanggungan.” Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 20, no. 3 (2018): 457–72.
Kogin, Kevin, Moch Isnaeni, and Endang Prasetyawati. “Ratio Legis of Using Cross Collateral and Cross Default Clauses in Banking Credit Contract.” JL Pol’y & Globalization 78 (2018): 82.
Nur, Dimas. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Bank Pemegang Hak Tanggungan Peringkat Kedua Dalam Eksekusi Objek Hak Tanggungan.” Media Iuris 1 (2018).
Sriwati, Sriwati. “Legal Protection for Creditor under Cross Default and Cross Collateral Clause in a Credit Agreement.” Konfrontasi: Jurnal Kultural, Ekonomi Dan Perubahan Sosial 8, no. 1 (2021): 12–22.
Copyright (c) 2023 Roulinta Yesvery Sinaga, Risqi Mumpuni Dyastuti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
