Kualifikasi Justice Collaborator Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 48/Pid.Sus-TPK/2020/PN Jkt Pst)

  • Abdul Rahman Saliu Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia.
  • Reimon Supusepa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia.
  • Astuti Nur Fadillah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia.
Keywords: Qualifications, Justice Collaborator, Corruption Crimes

Abstract

Introduction: The law enforcement process has several stages, one of the most decisive in eradicating crime is the criminal justice system. There are several terms used in the judicial process, one of which is Justice Collaborator which is regulated in several regulations including Article 10 A paragraph (1) jo, paragraph 3 Law No. 31 of 2014 concerning PSK which in essence provides an explanation that "witnesses of perpetrators can be given awards for the testimony given in the form of: leniency in criminal sentences (covering criminal penalties, special conditional sentences, or the lightest punishment among other defense attorneys), conditional sentences , additional remissions and other compensation rights in accordance with statutory provisions for perpetrator witnesses who have driver status.

Purposes of the Research: Juridically analyze the qualifications of justice collaborators in corruption crimes.

Methods of the Research: The method used in this research is normative juridical using a statutory and regulatory approach and contextual approach.

Results of the Research: The Justice Collaborator status given to a suspect or defendant or even a convict will have a big impact on him. One of the well-known cases of the application of Justice Collaborator was in the criminal case of bribery for the election of deputy governor of Bank Indonesia which ensnared 26 members of the people's representative council. Agus Condro, who is a criminal and Justice Collaborator, Agus Condro was sentenced to a lighter sentence than the prosecutor demanded. The judge's considerations in sentencing defendant Tommy Sumardi, who has the status of Justice Collaborator in the case of removing Djoko Tjandra's red notice status, defendant Tommy Sumardi was sentenced to prison for 2 (two) years and a fine of Rp. 100,000,000.00 (one hundred million rupiah).) subsidiary 6 (six) months in prison. Imprisonment sentences and fines are higher than those charged by the public prosecutor.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jurnal

Abdul Haris Semendawal, Penetapan Justice Collaborator Bagi Tersangka Atau Terdakwa Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia, Padjajaran journal of law, Vol 3, No 3, 2016.

Briant Darek, Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagai Justice Collaborator Menurut Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia, Lex Et Societatis, Vol. V, No. 5, Juli, 2017.

Ni Luh Made Dwi Puspariani, Urgensi Saksi Pelaku Yang Bekerja Sama (Justice Collaborator) Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, Vol 1, No 1, Agustus, 2020.

Nomero Armandheo Simamora, Edi Pranoto, Tinjauan Yuridis Penetapan Status Justice Collaborator Di Indonesia, Iblam Law Review, Vol 3, No 1, 2023.

Puteri Hikmawati, Upaya Perlindungan Whistleblower Dan Justice Collaborator Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Negara Hukum, Vol 4, No. 1, juni, 2013.

Reimon Supusepa, Problematika Pembuktian Terbalik Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jurnal Belo, Vol 4, No 2, 2019.

River Yohanes Manalu, Justice Collaborator Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Lex Crimen, Vol IV, No 1, 2015.

Supriadi Widodo Eddyono, Prospek Perlindungan Justice Collabolator Di Indonesia, Perbandingan Dengan Di Amerika Dan Eropa, Jurnal Perlindungan Vol 1, No 1, 2011.

Rusli Muhammad, Pengaturan Dan Urgensi Whistle Blower Dan Justice Collaborator Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Jurnal Hukum, Ius Quia Iustum, No. 2, Vol.22, April 2015.

Buku

Amin, Rahman, (2020), Perlindungan hukum justice collabolator dalam sistem peradilam pidana di Indonesia, deepublish, Surabaya.

Ali, Achmad, (2009), Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) Dan Teori Peradilan (Judicial Prudence), Kencana, Jakarta.

Efendi, Jonaedi, (2018), Rekonstruksi Dasar Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Berbasis Nilai-Nilai Hukum dan Rasa Keadilan yang Hidup dalam Masyarakat, Kencana, Jakarta.

Mulyadi, Lilik, (2014), Seraut Wajah Putusan Hakim Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Muhtaj, Majda El, (2007), Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Konstitusi Indonesia, Perkembangan Pemikiran Demokrasi Dan Negara Hukum, Kencana, Jakarta.

Rahardjo, Sutjipto, (2007) Kontibusi Lembaga Sosial Mendorong Reformasi Peradilan, Komisi Yudisial dan Reformasi Peradilan, Jakarta.

Online/ Online/World Wide Web, Dan Lain-Lain

https://amp.kompas.com/nasional/read/2020/12/29/17385281/perantara-suap-djoko- tjandra-tommy-sumardi-divonis-2-tahun-penjara, diakses pada 07 juni, 2023, pukul 17:25

https://putusan3.MahkamahhAgung.go.id/search.html/?q=%22H.%20tommy%20sumardi%20, diakses pada 07 juni, 2023, pukul 17:50.

https://news.republika.co.id/berita/qm3o73409/tommy-sumardi-jadi-jc-tapi-vonis-lebih-berat-dari-tuntutan. Diakses pada tanggal 28 september 2023, pukul 22: 34.

Published
2024-05-31
How to Cite
Saliu, A., Supusepa, R., & Fadillah, A. (2024). Kualifikasi Justice Collaborator Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 48/Pid.Sus-TPK/2020/PN Jkt Pst). MATAKAO Corruption Law Review, 2(1), 28-41. https://doi.org/10.47268/matakao.v2i1.13513