Penyalahgunaan Gedung Konsulat Jenderal Di Negara Penerima, Perspektif Konvensi Wina 1963

  • Samuel Silvester Retraubun Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
  • Arman Anwar Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
  • Josina Augustina Yvonne Wattimena Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Keywords: Misuse of Consulate Buildings, Recipient Countries, Vienna Convention

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The Consulate General building is a facility for the sending country in carrying out the duties and functions of consular relations with the receiving country. Purposes of the Research:  Studying and knowing the Functions of the Consulate General Building in the Receiving Country, Perspective of the 1963 Vienna Convention, To study and find out the Legal Consequences of Misuse of the Consulate General Building and Its Impact on Diplomatic Relations of the Two Countries. Methods of the Research: Normative juridical research method, namely obtaining data from the library in the form of documents, books, magazines and other literature related to writing. Results of the Research: The results of the study show that in the perspective of the 1963 Vienna Convention, the rights and obligations of the sending and receiving countries have been regulated in a balanced manner towards the implementation of the functions of the consulate building in order to expand cooperation in consular relations. On the one hand, the sending country has special rights and immunity to its consulate building and is obliged to function it according to its designation by respecting the national law of the receiving country.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jurnal

Chris Joshua N. Laoh, Akiat Hukum Atas Status Persona Non Grata Seorang Penerima Lex et Societatis, Vol. III/No. 4/Mei/2015

Irma Halimah Hanafi, Analisis Kasus Penembakan Pesawat Udara Ukraina oleh Militer Iran, Jurnal Balobe, Vol 1 N0 2, Oktober 2021

Windy Lasut, “Penanggalan Kekebalan Diplomatik di Negara Penerima Menurut Konvesi Wina 1961”, Lex Crimen, Volume 5, Nomor 4, April-Juni 2016

Widuhung, S. S. (2017). Tanggung Jawab Negara Penerima Terhadap Keselamatan Pejabat Diplomatik Menurut Vienna Convention On Diplomaic Relations 1961. LEX PRIVATUM, 5(8).

Buku

Boer Mauna, Hukum Internasional, Pengertian, Peranan, dan Fungsi dalam Era Dinamika Global, PT Alumni Bandung, 2000

Elizabeth A. Martin, A Dictionary of Law, Oxford University Press, Mew York, 2002

Huala Adolf, Aspek-Aspek Negara Dalam Hukum Internasional, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2002

J.G Strake, Introduction to International Law, nintch Edition, Butterword, 1984

Sumaryo Suryokusumo, hukum diplomatik: Teori dan Kasus, Alumi, Bandung, 1995

Setyo Widagdo,Hanif Widhiyanti,Hukum Diplomtik dan Konsuler, Malang, Bayu Media, 2008

Sumaryo Suryokusumo, Hukum Diplomatik dan Konsuler, PT.Tatanusa, Jakarta, 2013

Syahmin, A. K., and Fidelia Fidelia. "The International Cooperation to Eradicate Illicit Firearms Trafficking in Southeast Asian Region." Sriwijaya Law Review, 2018

Online/World Wide Web:

Anthares Ramadhan, Pelanggaran dan Penyalahgunaan Fungsi Gedung Perwakilan Diplomatik oleh Negara Pengirim Terkait Dengan Penyimpanan Senjata Api Didalam Gedung Perwakilan Dikaitkan Dengan VCDR 1961, http://repository.unpad.ac.id, Diakses pada 25 November 2021.

Diplomat AS: Konsulat China di Houston Adalah Pusat Pencurian Riset dan Spionase, https://news.okezone.com, Diakses pada 26 Oktober 2021.

Hubungan AS-China Semakin Panas: Diplomat AS Tinggalkan Konsulat Di Chengdu, Warga Melambaikan Bendera China, https://www.bbc.com, Diakses pada 5 Agustus 2021.

https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/9_4_1973. pdf, diakses 30 maret 2022.

https://ejuirnal.unstrat.ac.id Diakses 20 juni 2022.

Kronologis & Penyelidikan Hilangnya Jamal Khashoggi, https://www.kompas.ac.id Diakses pada 25 November 2021.

Published
2023-08-31
How to Cite
Retraubun, S., Anwar, A., & Wattimena, J. (2023). Penyalahgunaan Gedung Konsulat Jenderal Di Negara Penerima, Perspektif Konvensi Wina 1963. PATTIMURA Law Study Review, 1(1), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.47268/palasrev.v1i1.10581