Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditur Atas Jaminan Hutang Berupa Hak Cipta Konten Youtube

  • Elvira Lorna Fidelia Zai Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
  • Theresia Nolda Agnes Narwadan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
  • Muchtar Anshary Hamid Labetubun Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9607-7384
Keywords: Creditor Legal Protection, Copyright, Youtube Content

Abstract

ABSTRACT: In Government Regulation Number 24 of 2022 Concerning the Creative Economy, it makes it easy for creative economy actors who have intellectual property rights certificates through this regulation, the Government gives permission to content creators who already have intellectual property certificates to serve as bank credit guarantees. However, there are still confusions in this implementation because the creditor will suffer losses when the debtor's default occurs because the collateralized asset is blocked. so that the valuation of assets in the form of intellectual property rights on the youtube channel is very difficult to do based on Article 25 paragraph 1c Law 24/1999 concerning fiduciary guarantees stipulating that fiduciary guarantees are deleted due to the destruction of objects that are objects of fiduciary guarantees automatically bank financial institutions suffer losses. The research method used is normative juridical, using a problem approach, namely the statutory approach and contextual approach, the sources of legal materials used are primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The legal material collection technique used was library legal material collection, which was analyzed using qualitative methods. The results of this study indicate that legal protection for creditors for copyrighted YouTube content is in the form of copyright, namely through preventive legal protection provided by the government in the form of prevention before violations occur, efforts are made to prevent violations from occurring, namely the application of judgment on banks to carry out the precautionary principle when giving credit to customers by conducting judgments on private customers, businesses and collateral objects provided by customers and repressive protection, namely final protection in the form of sanctions and punishments carried out through executorial titles. Settlement of disputes with YouTube content copyright as collateral is litigation settlement by filing lawsuits with commercial courts and non-litigation with settlements through negotiation, mediation and conciliation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jurnal

Kezia Arum Sary, Sugandi, Annisa Wahyuni Arsyad, Praktik Membuat Vlog Mendukung Kebangkitan Ekonomi Kreatifitas Indonesia, Universitas Mulawarman, 2020, Vol 2 No 1.

Martin Anggiat Maranata Manurung, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditor Apabila Objek Jaminan Fidusia Ternyata Hilang Dan Debitor Wanprestasi (Studi Kasus Di PT. Bank Perkreditan Rakyat Dinamika Bagunan Arta Salatiga), Jurnal Akta Faculty of Law, Sultan Agung Islamic University, Indonesia, 2017, Vol. 4 No. 1, Hal 39.

Muhammad Moerdiono Muhtar, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Pada Perjanjian Fidusia Dalam Praktek, Lex Privatum, 2013, Vol.1 No.2, hal 3.

Muchtar Anshary Hamid Labetubun, Aspek Hukum Hak Cipta Terhadap Buku Elektronik (E-Book) Sebagai Karya Kekayaan Intelektual, SASI, 2018, Vol 24 No 2.

Sinurat Tedy Setiada, Abdul Atsar, Grasia Kurniati, Perlindungan Hukum atas Pembajakan Hak Cipta Video di Situs Youtube, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum FH Riau, 2020, Vol. 9 No. 2.

Sri Ahyani, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Melalui Perjanjian Jaminan Fidusia, Jurnal Wawasan Hukum, Bandug, 2011, Vol. 24 No. 1.

Theresia N. A Narwadan, Hak Moral Pencipta Atas Karya Cipta Yang diunduh Dari Internet, SASI 20, no 20 (2014): 71-79, https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v20i2.329.

Buku

Gusri Putra Dodi, Abitrase Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia, Kencana, Jakarta, 2022. Khoirul Hidayah,. Hukum HKI (Hak Kekayaan Intelektual) di Indonesia Kajian Undang-Undang & Integrasi, Malang 2012.

Mardani, Penyelesaian Sangketa Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Syariah Litigasi Dan Non Litigasi, Kencana, Jakarta, 2020.

Nurnaningsih Amriani, Mediasi Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Pengadilan, Rajawali Pres, Jakarta, 2012.

Philipus M. Hadjon, Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia, Gajah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta, 2011, hal 10.

Takdir Rahmadi, Mediasi penyelesaian sengketa Melalui pendekatan Mufakat, RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2011.

Trisdini Prasastinah Usanti dan Leonora Bakarbessy, Hukum Jaminan, Revka Petra Media, Surabaya, 2013.

Yahman, Batas Pembeda wanprestasi & Penipuan Dalam Hubungan Kontraktual, Jakad Media Publishing, 2021.

---------, karakteristik Wanprestasi dan Tindak Pidana Penipuan, Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta.

Published
2023-08-31
How to Cite
Zai, E., Narwadan, T., & Labetubun, M. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditur Atas Jaminan Hutang Berupa Hak Cipta Konten Youtube. PATTIMURA Law Study Review, 1(1), 233-245. https://doi.org/10.47268/palasrev.v1i1.10844