Pembatalan Merek Terdaftar Yang Memiliki Persamaan Nama Pada Pokoknya
Abstract
ABSTRACT: According to Law Number 20 of 2016 Concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications, Article 21 Paragraph 1 Letters a and c Concerning Trademark Registration Procedures which explains that the application for trademark registration is rejected if the registered trademark belongs to another party or is applied for beforehand by another party for similar goods and/or services and has no distinguishing power, but in practice there are registered brands that have the same name in essence, namely the "GOTO" brand which has similarities in writing and pronunciation. The law related to the problem is then linked to secondary legal material through books, articles, journals or writings by legal experts, after which it is connected with legal facts, legal events and legal consequences which are carried out using the Statute Approach and the Conceptual Approach. The research results show: 1). The trademark rights holder is the first party to register the mark with the Directorate General of Intellectual Property Rights, and the holder of the rights to this mark receives legal protection, if another party registers the same mark, it has violated the system adopted by the law, namely the first to file principle and also violates the law itself as the accommodator of all regulations regarding trademark registration 2). Settlement of the Goto case as an effort to resolve the similarity in the mark at registration, legal action through a lawsuit in a commercial court as a legal remedy if it is proven to legally use the mark without permission.
Downloads
References
Jurnal
Enny Mirfa, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Terdaftar, Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, Vol. 11, No. 1, Januari-Juni 2016.
Teng berlianty " Pendaftaran Merek Produk Usaha Mikro Kecil dan Menengah untuk memperkuat daya saing menghadapi masyarakat Ekonomi Asia " Sasi Vol. 23 No 1. (2017).
Yunus Marlon Lopulalan, Rory Jeff Akyuwen, Marselo Valentino Geovani Pariela. Hak Cipta Logo Yang Didaftarkan Sebagai Merek, TATOHI Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 1, No. 1 (2021).
Buku
Adrian Sutedi, Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2009.
Usman, Rachmadi, Hukum Hak atas kekayaan intelektual, Alumni, Bandung, 2003.
Online, Dan Lain-Lain
Miftahul Hag, “Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap penyelesaian sengketa pembatalan pendaftaran merek berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2001 tentang Merek; Studi Kasus pada Putusan-putusan Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Pusat; (Tesis Universitas SumateraUtara,Medan,2007),h.17,Gojek,”About”https://www.gojek.com/en-id/about/,diakses 13 april 2023.
Copyright (c) 2023 Yehuda Goodlife Nusale, Teng Berlianty, Theresia Louize Pesulima
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
