Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Perkosaan (Studi Putusan Nomor 451/Pid.B/2021/PN Amb)

  • Jimmy Rivaldo Nampasnea Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
  • Sherly Adam Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
  • Carolina Tuhumury Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Keywords: Legal Considerations of Judges, Actors, Rape Crimes

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The freedom of judges will be limited by statutory regulations (criminal procedural law), as stipulated in Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). So that in deciding cases of rape crime, it must have a clear basis of consideration and can provide a deterrent effect on the perpetrator. The aim of the research is to examine and analyze the judge's legal considerations for the perpetrators of the crime of rape and to examine and analyze the imposition of sanctions on the perpetrators of the crime in the perspective of the purpose of punishment. In this legal research, the authors use Normative Juridical legal research which obtains data from literature studies in the form of laws, documents, books, magazines and other literature related to writing. The results of the research show that the judge's legal considerations for the perpetrators of the criminal act of rape study the decision number 451/Pid.B/2021/PN Amb, legally and convincingly proven guilty of committing the crime of rape. This is in accordance with the prosecutor's indictment, the defendant's statement, witness testimony, evidence, articles in the criminal law regulations and the defendant's background. The imposition of sanctions for the perpetrators of the crime of rape in the perspective of the purpose of sentencing is in accordance with sentencing and the defendant is given a criminal sanction of 10 (ten) years in prison, so what is the objective of sentencing and providing a deterrent effect on the perpetrators can be realized.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jurnal

Cantika Wandasari Muhrim, Sherly Adam, Elias Zadrach Leasa, (2022). "Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Kesaksian Yang Meringankan Dalam Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan" Tatohi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No 10.

H.L.A. Hart dalam Muladi, 2005. Dampak Disparitas Pidana dan Usaha Mengatasinya, Alumni, Bandung, Jurnal Legilasi Indonesia. Vol. 6 No. 4.

Margie Gladies Sopacua, “Viktimisasi Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana (Studi Kasus Perkosaan)”, Jurnal Sasi Vol. 21 No. 2, Juli-Desember 2015.

Ni Made Dwi Kristiani, 2014. “Kejahatan Kekerasaan Seksual (Perkosaan) Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Kriminologis”, Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana. Vol. 7 No. 3.

Suhariyono AR. 2009 “Penentuan Sanksi Pidana Dalam Suatu Undang-Undang”. Jurnal Legilasi Indonesia.Vol. 6 No. 4.

Buku

Achmad Ali, 1999. Menguak Tabir Hukum Suatu Kajian Filosofis dan Sosiologis, Jakarta: Gunung Agung.

Adami Chazawi, 2013. Kejahatan terhadap Tubuh & Nyawa, Jakarta, Raja Grafindo.

--------, 2014. Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagian 1, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.

Bismar Siregar, 1989. Bunga Rampai Karangan Tersebar, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Erdianto Efendi. 2011. Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Refika Aditama. Bandung.

Leden Marpaung. 2012. Asas Teori Praktik Hukum Pidana. Sinar Grafika. Jakarta.

M. Munandar sulaeman, 2010. Kekerasan Terhadap Perempuan, Jakarta, Refika aditama

Muladi dan Barda Nawawi A. 1984. Teori – Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana. Alumni. Bandung.

Rusli Muhammad, 2007. Hukum Acara Pidana Konteporer, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Teguh Prasetyo, 2013. Hukum Pidana, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.

Published
2023-08-31
How to Cite
Nampasnea, J., Adam, S., & Tuhumury, C. (2023). Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Perkosaan (Studi Putusan Nomor 451/Pid.B/2021/PN Amb). PATTIMURA Law Study Review, 1(1), 92-100. https://doi.org/10.47268/palasrev.v1i1.10873