Disparitas Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Ambon Nomor 32/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PN Amb Dengan Putusan Nomor 34/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PN Amb
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Criminal disparity is a problem that has long been the center of attention of academics. Ambon District Court Decision Number 32/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PN Amb with decision Number 34/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PN Amb, the formation of the panel of judges is the same. The criminal acts committed were the same at the same time and place, however,but has the aim of analyzing and discussing the differences in the court decisions in the two cases and then discussing and explaining the causes of the differences in the two decisions . The type of research used in this research is normative legal studies. Normative legal research is legal research conducted by investigating literature or secondary data. Data sources used are primary data and secondary data. The data collection technique was carried out, namely searching for and collecting laws and regulations relating to the legal issues encountered. The results of the research showed that the difference in the Court's decision in the PN case in the Court's decision in the Ambon PN case Number 32/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PN Amb with decision Number 34/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PN Amb is First, the articles granted by the judges are different. II as a Commitment Making Officer (PPK), with the same job, but from the judge's decision for both cases the first decision of the panel of judges used article 2 (unlawful elements) and the second decision used article 3 (abuse of authority).
Downloads
References
Jurnal
Molly Cheang, Disparity of Sentencing, Malaya Low Journal, PTE Ltd, 1997
Patrick Corputty, John Dirk Pasalbessy, Jacob Hattu, Yonna Beatrix Salamor, Criminal Sentence Disparity of Village Funds Abuse In Maluku, Jurnal Sasi, Vol 29 N0 1, Maret 2023
Buku
Barda Nawawi, Teori-Teori Dan Kebijakan Pidana, Cetakan keempat, Bandung, 2010.
Erdianto Efendi, Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Refika Aditama, Bandung, 2011.
Lilik Mulyadi, Kompilasi Hukum Pidana Dalam Prespektif Teoritis Dan Prakter Pradilan, Mandar Maju, Jakarta, 2007.
Muladi, Hak Asasi Manusia Hakekat, Konsep dan Implikasinya dalamPerspektif Hukum dan Masyarakat, Refika Aditama, Bandung, 1997.
Moh. Taufik Makarao, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Acara Perdata, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta, 2004.
M.Yahya Harahap, Hukum Acara Perdata, Media Grup, Jakarta, 2014.
R. Soepomo, Hukum Acara Perdata Pengadilan Negeri, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta, 1994.
Zainab Ompu Jainah, Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, Tangerang: Tira Smart, 2018.
Lain-Lain
Hardjono Reksodiputro, Bunga Rampai Permasalahan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Pusat Pelayanan Keadilan Dan Pengabdian Hukum, Jakarta, 1998.
Harkristuti Harkrisnowo, Rekonstruksi Konsep Pemidanaan: Suatu GugatanTerhadap Proses Legislasi dan Pemidanaan di Indonesia, Orasi pada Upacara Pengukuhan Guru Besar Tetap dalam llmu Hukum Pidana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia di Balai Sidang Universitas Indonesia, 2003.
Copyright (c) 2023 Heidy Mandaku, John Dirk Pasalbessy, Jacob Hattu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
