Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pengguna Anggaran Makan Dan Minum (Studi Putusan MA RI No 832 K/Pid.Sus/2017)

  • Annisyah Sahaya Ahmad Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
  • Elsa Rina Maya Toule Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
  • Jacob Hattu Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Keywords: Corruption Crime, Procurement of Goods and Services, Criminal Liability

Abstract

ABSTRACT : This study discusses the legal arrangements regarding the procurement of goods and services in relation to criminal acts of corruption and the criminal responsibility of perpetrators of corruption in these cases. Purposes of the research to analyze and discuss legal arrangements regarding procurement of goods and services in relation to criminal acts of corruption and to explain criminal responsibility for perpetrators of corruption in the procurement of food and drink budgets for Members of the DPRD Kota Tual for the 2010 Fiscal Year in terms of the PTPK Law. The research method used is normative juridical research. In this study, three approaches to the problem are used, namely the statutory approach, the conceptual approach, and the case approach. Sources of data obtained are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials uses the literature study method. All data in this study were analyzed qualitatively. The results of this study indicate that, legal arrangements related to the procurement of goods and services function to regulate and know procedures/procedures for good and correct implementation. The element against the law is one of the parameters in determining personal responsibility for personal mistakes committed by perpetrators. The perpetrators of corruption in this case have fulfilled the elements of the indictment charged by the Public Prosecutor and therefore the perpetrators must be held accountable for their actions. The judge's legal considerations were in accordance with the existing rules by considering aggravating circumstances as well as mitigating circumstances based on the legal facts found during the trial.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jurnal

Hattu, Jacob. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pengambilan Jenasah Covid-19 Secara Paksa Berdasarkan Aturan Tindak Pidana Umum dan Tindak Pidana Khusus”. Jurnal Belo 6, no. 1 (Januari, 2021): 1

Prakoso, Tamala. “Pemenuhan Unsur Memperkaya Diri Sendiri Atau Orang Lain Atau Korporasi Dalam Pasal 2 UU Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 dan Unsur Menguntungkan Diri Sendiri Atau Orang Lain Atau Korporasi Dalam Pasal 3 UU Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Pada Putusan Hakim Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi ( Studi Putusan Nomor 238/Pid.B/2009/Pn.Kray Jo. Nomor 373/Pid.B/2010 Pt Smg Jo Nomor 167k/Pid.Sus/2011/ Di Pengadilan Negeri Karanganyar)”. Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan 3, no. 1 (2014) : 22.

Sanjaya, Kadek dkk. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dana Hibah Pengadaan Bibit Sapi (Studi Putusan Nomor 1/Pid.Sus-TPK/2019/PN DPS)”. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum 1, no. 1 (2020): 40-41.

Buku

Ali, Mahrus dan Hanafi Amrani, 2015, Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana, Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2015.

Arsyad, Jawade dan Dian Karisma, Sentralisasi Birokrasi Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2018.

Huda, Chairul, Dari Tindak Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan Menuju Kepada Tiada Pertanggungjawab Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan, Jakarta: Kencana, 2006.

Klitgaard, Robert, dkk, Penuntun Pemberantasan Korupsi dalam Pemerintahan Daerah, Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 2005.

Moeljatno, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 1993.

Nadapdap, Binoto, Hukum Acara Persaingan Usaha, Jakarta: Jala Permata Aksara, 2009.

Putra, Risqi, Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Sleman: Deepublish, 2020.

Waluyo, Bambang, Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Strategi dan Optimalisasi, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016.

Published
2023-08-31
How to Cite
Ahmad, A., Toule, E., & Hattu, J. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pengguna Anggaran Makan Dan Minum (Studi Putusan MA RI No 832 K/Pid.Sus/2017). PATTIMURA Law Study Review, 1(1), 198-205. https://doi.org/10.47268/palasrev.v1i1.11073