Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pengemudi Online Yang Mengalami Kerugian Akibat Orderan Fiktif Pada Layanan GrabFood

  • Faldi Rumasoreng Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
  • Theresia Louize Pesulima Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
  • Ronald Fadly Sopamena Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Keywords: Legal Protection, Loss, Fictitious Orders

Abstract

PT. Grab Indonesian collaborates with partners or drivers to enter into partnership agreements known in Law Number 20 of 2008 concerning Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises. In accordance with Article 1 Number 13 of Law Number 20 of 2008 concerning Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises confirms that the legal relationship between the two parties becomes a partnership relationship. But in this perspective, it cannot be said that the regulation can protect partners or drivers. This can be seen in fact there are still people who abuse the Grab application by making bookings that can harm partners or drivers if the booker does not pay in full for the ordered order using the COD (Cash On Delivery) transaction pattern or cash payment. This study used normative juridical research motede. This research is carried out by examining library materials or secondary data with conceptual and legislative approaches then the data is analyzed qualitatively and conclusions are drawn deductively, which is based on basic principles. The results of this study show that: 1) The legal consequences of fictitious order actions can be seen in two forms; First, from the form of unlawful acts. Where the perpetrator acts differently than required in terms of carrying out fictitious ordering actions by ordering food on GrabFood services. Second, from the form of default, where the perpetrator has committed acts of negligence and deliberate acts of fictitious ordering on GrabFood services. 2). The form of protection carried out by PT. Grab Indonesia one of them is providing forms of responsibility between the parties in the content of the partnership agreement in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. Then the responsibility of PT. Grab Indonesia as a business actor adheres to the principle of responsibility based on the element of error, where there is a fictitious order on the GrabFood service resulting in losses for the driver or drivers. So in order to compensate, the driver only gives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jurnal

Indah Sari, 2020, Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (PMH) Dalam Hukum Pudana Dan Hukum Perdata, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dirgantara, Vol. 11, No. 11.

R. A. Nugraha & Dewi Hinearti, 2019, “Analisis Orderan Fiktif Terhadap Ojek Online Dikaji Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Transaksi Elektronik”, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 5 No. 2.

Ronald. F. Sopamena, 2021, Kekuatan Hukum MoU Dari Segi Hukum Perjanjian, Batulis Civil Law Review, Vol. 2 No. 1.

Buku

Abdulkadir Muhammad, 2004, Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Agus Rahardjo, 2002, Pemahaman & Upaya Pencegahan Kejahatan Berteknologi, Citra Aditya Bakti, Jakarta.

Ahmad Miru, 2007, Hukum Kontrak Dan Perancangan Kontrak, Edisi Revisi, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Celine T. S. Kristiyanti, 2008, Hukum Perlidungan Konsumen, PT. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Gunawan Widjaya & Kartini Mulyadi, 2003, Perikatan Yang Lahir Dari Undang-Undang, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Kotler & Amstrong, 2008, Prinsip-Prinsip Pemasaran, (Terjemahan Bob Sabaran) Edisi ke dua belas, Erlangga, Jakarta.

Philipus M. hadjon, 1987, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Di Indonesia, Bina Ilmu, Surabya.

Pipin Syarifin, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, 2011, Pustaka Setia, Jakarta.

R. Subekti dan Rtjitrosudibio, 2013, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Rismawati, 2018, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen, Media Prenada, Depok.

Satjipto Rahardjo, 2006, Ilmu Hukum, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Soerjono Soekanto, 1984, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Ui Press, Jakarta.

Suwardjo. P. Warpani, 2002, Pengelolaan Lalu lintas & Angkutan Jalan, Penerbit ITB, Bandung.

Rezky Wulandari, 2014, Buku Ajar Hukum Dagang, Mitra Wacana Media, Jakarta.

Yahya Harahap, 1982, Segi-Segi Hukum Perikatan, Alumni, Bandung.

Lain-Lain

Money Kompas, https://money.kompas.com/read/2020/20/06/151730026/Grab-punya-5-fitur-baru-dipakai-untuk-apa-saja?page=all, Diakses pada 19 Maret 2020.

Muchsin, 2003, “Perlindungan dan Kepastian Hukum Bagi Investor Di Indonesia”, Magister Ilmu Hukum Program Prasarjana Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta.

Published
2023-12-18
How to Cite
Rumasoreng, F., Pesulima, T., & Sopamena, R. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pengemudi Online Yang Mengalami Kerugian Akibat Orderan Fiktif Pada Layanan GrabFood. PATTIMURA Law Study Review, 1(2), 383-393. https://doi.org/10.47268/palasrev.v1i2.11784