Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pihak Ketiga Akibat Pelelangan Mobil Di Pegadaian

  • Gianlie Angwen Lamaloang Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia.
  • Theresia Louize Pesulima Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia.
  • Roulinta Yesvery Sinaga Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia.
Keywords: Collateral, Pawn, Auction

Abstract

The guarantee position in a pawn guarantee can be carried out by the Debtor itself or by a Third Party acting as a guarantor. The pawn agreement process requires the presence of a Third Party directly without representation, this is regulated in Article 1152 of the Civil Code. However, it turns out that there is a Pawn Guarantee issued by Pegadaian without the presence of a Third Party. Instead of signing an invalid pawn agreement, it also turns out that the collateral object is finally auctioned, which ultimately harms the Third Party as the Owner of the Collateral Object. This research uses normative juridical research methods with statutory and conceptual approaches. The position of the Pawn Collateral Object when the auction is valid if it has fulfilled the formal requirements and material requirements of the auction. The auction can only be carried out if the pawn guarantor is valid, therefore if the pawn agreement is invalid then the auction of the collateral object is also invalid because it does not meet the formal and material requirements. In addition, the invalid auction carried out by the pawnshop is an illegal act, this is because the pawn agreement is invalid. This agreement does not present the Third Party directly. There are two legal protections for third parties whose goods are pawned without permission, namely preventive legal protection such as the owner of the collateral must sign directly and repressive protection includes canceling the auction, returning goods and compensation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul Khalim, “Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Gugatan Pelaksanaan Lelang Di KPKNL,” Kementrian Keuangan Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Negara, 1, last modified 2014, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/artikel/baca/5097/Perbuatan-Melawan-Hukum-dalam-Gugatan-Pelaksanaan-Lelang-di-KPKNL.html.

Amalia Rizki Yulianti, “Mengenal Balai Lelang,” Kementrian Keuangan Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Negara, last modified 2023, https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/kanwil-sumseljambibabel/baca-artikel/16590/Mengenal-Balai-Lelang.html.

Ashibly, Buku Ajar Hukum Jaminan, Bengkulu: MIH Unihaz, 2018.

Azzahra and Badriyah, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemenang Lelang Atas Objek Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan,”.

Dilva Muzdaliva Sawotong, “Jaminan Kebendaan Pada PT. Pegadaian Terhadap Barang Yang Digadaikan,” Lex Privatum 2, no. 1 (2014).

Hanna Kathia Septianti, “Syarat Dan Eksekusi Gadai Saham,” SIP Law Firm, 1, last modified 2023, accessed April 23, 2025, https://siplawfirm.id/syarat-dan-eksekusi-gadai-saham/?lang=id.

Leonara Bakarbessy and Ghansam Anand, Buku Ajar Hukum Perikatan, Sidoarjo: Zifatama Jawara, 2018.

Made Nurmawati Parwata, I Putu Gede, “Akibat Hukum Perjanjian Gadai Yang Dilakukan Dengan Jaminan Barang Bergerak Bukan Hak Milik Debitur,” E-Journal Ilmu Hukum Kertha Wicara, Universitas Udayana 8 (2019).

Muhammad Iqbaal Fadhilah, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pembeli Lelang Yang Beritikad Baik,” Kementrian Keuangan Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Negara, 1, last modified 2020, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/kpknl-gorontalo/baca-artikel/13352/Perlindungan-HukumTerhadap-Pembeli-Lelang-yang-Beritikad-Baik.html#:~:text=Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik,pasti dan dijamin oleh hukum.

Pegadaian Digital, “Syarat Dan Ketentuan,” Pegadaian, last modified 2021, https://digital.pegadaian.co.id/syarat-ketentuan.

Puri Galih Kris Endarto, “Tinjauan Yuridis Gugatan Intervensi Tussenkomst Sebagai Upaya Hukum Alternatif Dalam Gugatan Hukum Acara Perdata Biasa,” Pandecta vol.5, no. 2 (2010).

Purwanto, “Modus Dan Jenis Fraud Dalam Lembaga Pegadaian Dari Hasil Putusan Pengadilan Mahkamah Agung,” AKTIVA Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Investas 1, no. 1 (2016): hlm. 34–43, http://ejournal.unira.ac.id/index.php/jurnal_aktiva/article/view/145/125.

Pusnia Abdul Munsir, Merry Tjoanda, and Ronald Fadly Sopamena, “Perlindungan Hukum Kepada Kreditur Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Dengan Jaminan Hak Tanggungan,” PATTIMURA Law Study Review 1, no. 1 (2023): h. 92, https://doi.org/10.30652/jih.v5i2.3600.

Renata Christha Aulia, “Akibat Hukum Jika Somasi Diabaikan,” Hukum Online Com, last modified 2023, accessed May 9, 2025, https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/akibat-hukum-jika-somasi-diabaikan-cl483/.

Rohman et al., Kompas Transformasi Hukum Jaminan (Arah Pembaharuan Dalam Perkembangan Praktik Hukum Jaminan Di Indonesia).

Ronald Saija et al., “Implikasi Ambiguitas Kreditur Separatis Dan Kurator Dalam Pembagian Boedel Debitor Pailit Menurut Perspektif Philosophy,” PATTIMURA Legal Journal 3, no. 2 (2024).

Roni Mantiri, “Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Pada Kredit Macet,” Kementrian Keuangan Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Negara, 1, last modified 2013, accessed April 27, 2025, https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/berita_media/baca/3991/Eksekusi-Hak-Tanggungan-pada-Kredit-Macet.html#:~:text=Apabila terhadap objek lelang yang,hukum antara Bank dengan Debiturnya.

Roulinta Yesvery Sinaga, “Dualisme Makna Akta Pengakuan Hutang,” PATTIMURA Legal Journal 1, no. 3 (2022).

Sedyo Prayogo, “Penerapan Batas-Batas Wanprestasi Dan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Perjanjian,” Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 3, no. 2 (2016).

Sri Budi Purwaningsih, Hukum Jaminan & Agunan Kredit Dalam Praktek Perbankan Di Indonesia, Sidoarjo: Umsida Press, 2019.

Supraji, Jaminan Kebendaan Dalam Pembiayaan, Jakarta Selatan: UAI Press, 2021.

Surini Ahlan Sjarif, Intisari Hukum Benda Menurut Burgerlijk Wetboek, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1984.

Theresia Louize Pesulima and Ronald Fadly Sopamena, “Keamanan Produk Pangan Yang Dijual Melalui Media Sosial Dalam Perspektif Perlindungan Konsumen,” Bacarita Law Journal 3, no. 2 (2023): hlm. 122, https://doi.org/10.30598/bacarita.v3i2.8849.

Yulia, Buku Ajar Hukum Perdata, Aceh: Biena, 2015.

Published
2026-08-31
How to Cite
Lamaloang, G., Pesulima, T., & Sinaga, R. (2026). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pihak Ketiga Akibat Pelelangan Mobil Di Pegadaian. PATTIMURA Law Study Review, 4(2), 64-76. https://doi.org/10.47268/palasrev.v4i2.20693