Penerapan Diversi Terhadap Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Fisik

  • Gelsya Dominggas Monaten Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia.
  • Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia.
  • Margie Gladies Sopacua Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia.
Keywords: Diversion, Children, Physical Violence

Abstract

Diversion is the transfer of the settlement of children's cases from the criminal justice process to a process outside the criminal justice system, because children have rights to be protected, so the handling of children's cases and adult cases is certainly different. Diversion is an alternative solution to prevent the negative impact of the judicial process on children's growth and development. This study aims to analyze the factors causing the rampant behavior of physical violence against children and the application of diversion to children who are perpetrators of physical violence. The method used is empirical juridical with a qualitative descriptive approach, based on data from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study show that the factors causing children to become perpetrators of physical violence are disharmonious family factors, social environment, promiscuity, lack of moral education in the school environment, psychological factors, social media, economic factors, weak enforcement of discipline and sanctions. Although diversion efforts have a clear legal basis, their implementation in the field still encounters various obstacles, both structurally and culturally. This is due to the low public understanding of diversion and the rejection of the victim towards the mediation process. In the case of a child with a police report Number: LP/B/335/IX/2024/SPKT/Resta Ambon/Polda Maluku, it shows that the perpetrators aged 15 to 16 years have met the requirements to be processed criminally, but diversion is still applied, which gives rise to an imbalance in justice. Therefore, the legal approach to children must be educational and proportional without ignoring the victim's right to obtain justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bambang Sunggono, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2003.

Djamil M. NASIR, Anak Bukan Untuk Dihukum, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015.

M. Arifin, Diversi Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2018.

Maidin Gultom, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak, (Jakarta: Refika Aditama, 2010.

Margie G Sopacua, “Peran Balai Pemasyarakatan (BAPAS) Dalam Proses Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Yang Dilakukan Anak Berbasis Restoratif Justice”, Sasi 21, no. 2 (2015).

Margie Gladies Sopacua, “Criminology Study on the Circulation of the Sopi Traditional Liquor in the Villages of Zeith, Asilulu, and Kaitetu during the Covid-19 Pandemic”, Law Reform 17, no. 2 (2021).

Muhammad Ghalib Azmi Lubis, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan”, Law Jurnal 4, no. 1 (2023): 28-36.

Natalisya Tetelepta, Julianus E Latupeirissa, Anna M Salamor, “Penerapan Diversi Oleh Hakim Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Anak Ditingkat Pengadilan (Studi Pengadilan Negeri Masohi”, Pattimura Law Study Review 2, no. 1 (2024).

Terry E, Psikologi Kekerasan/Child Abuse, Makassar: Harian Pikiran Rakyat, 2009.

Widodo, “Diversi dan keadilan Restoratif dalam Sitem Peradilan Anak di Indonesia: Urgensi dan Implimkasinya”, Rechtldee Jurnal Hukum 10, no. 2 (2015).

Published
2026-08-31
How to Cite
Monaten, G., Latupeirissa, J., & Sopacua, M. (2026). Penerapan Diversi Terhadap Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Fisik. PATTIMURA Law Study Review, 4(2), 21-29. https://doi.org/10.47268/palasrev.v4i2.21201