Kewenangan Penetapan Anggota TNI Sebagai Tersangka Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi

  • Nadia Novekristin Belseran Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia.
  • Jemmy Jefry Pietersz Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon
  • Jacob Hattu Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon
Keywords: Determination of Suspects, Corruption Crimes, Military Courts

Abstract

Based on the Indonesian Constitution, all Indonesian people have an equal position in the eyes of the law (equality before the law), and are obliged to respect and obey the law and government without exception. The rule of law applies universally regardless of a person's status, so that state officials, businessmen, members of the Indonesian National Army/Indonesian Police, and ordinary people all obtain the same rights and positions before the law. This research uses normative juridical research methods with a statutory approach (Statute Approach), Case Approach and Conceptual Approach. The source of legal materials is in the form of primary and secondary legal materials. In terms of the collection of legal materials, sourced from literature studies, then analyzed qualitatively by processing legal materials and analyzing to obtain systematic and logical research results. Members of the Indonesian National Army are under the jurisdiction of the military courts when violating the provisions of military law, but are subject to the general court when committing violations of general criminal law or corruption crimes as part of the special criminal law. This condition occurs because there are various forms of violations both in terms of material and formality. The Military Police in the military environment is tasked with investigating Indonesian National Army personnel who commit crimes outside the general category. Therefore, the Corruption Eradication Commission, which is a special court institution, is authorized to handle the case, even if the perpetrator has active military status.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul Azis, “Kewenangan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Berdasarkan Teori Negara Hukum”, Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu: Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan 10, no. 2 (2018).

Ahmad Jamaludin, “Problematika Kewenangan Penetapan Tersangka Anggota TNI Oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi”, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 2 (2024).

Alfitra, Hukum Pembuktian dalam Beracara Pidana Perdata dan Korupsi Di Indonesia, Jakarta: Raih Asa Sukses, 2011.

Asep N. Mulyana, Hukum Pidana Militer Kontemporer, Jakarta: Grasindo, 2019.

Bambang Hartono, “Analisis Pelaksanaan Pidana Ganti Kerugian (Denda) Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi”, Keadilan Progresif 2, no. 1 (2011): 1-14.

Barda Nawawi Arief, Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, Bandung: Alumni, 2003.

Dedy Zulkifli, dkk, “Tinjauan Yuridis Empiris Terhadap Tindak Pidana Tidak Mentaati Suatu Perintah Dinas Berdasarkan Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Pidana Militer”, Jurnal Bedah Hukum 6, no. 2 (2022): 131-132.

Edward Omar Sharif Hiariej, “Asas Lex Specialis Systematis Dan Hukum Pidana Pajak (Principle Of Lex Specialist Systematic And Tax Criminal Law)”, Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 21, no. 1, (2020).

H. D. Stout & Ridwan HR, Hukum Administrasi Negara, Depok: Rajawali Press, 2018.

Jacob Hattu & Astuti Nur Fadillah, “Penyidikan Terhadap Anggota Militer Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Umum dan Tindak Pidana Korupsi”, LUTUR Law Journal 4, no. 2, (2023).

Jesylia Hillary Lawalata, Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarez Titahelu, dan Julianus Edwin Latupeirissa, “Pendekatan Restora ve Jus ce Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Narkotika Pada Tahapan Penyidikan”, TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 1 (2022): 91-112.

Miriam Budiardjo, Dasar-dasar Ilmu Politik, Jakarta: Gramedia, 1988.

Parluhutan Sagala & Fredy Ferdian, Yurisdiksi Peradilan Militer dalam Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia, Makalah yang disampaikan dalam rangka Workshop Comparative Law, Workshop Military Criminal Jurisdiction & Structure, Jakarta: United States Defense Institute of International Legal Studies (US DILS), (Juli 2016).

Rochmawan, Hukum Tata Negara, Jakarta: Gunung Agung, 1992.

Soerjono Soekanto, Sosiologi. Suatu Pengantar, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 1990.

Tagor Indra Mulia Lubis & Bagus Ramadi, “Kajian Teoritis Mengenai Korupsi, Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Dan Studi Perspektif Pada Teori Hukum Pidana Islam (Fiqh Jinayah)”, Journal of Sharia, Islamic Economics and Law 1, no. 2 (2023).

Vania Oktaviani Dewi & Irwan Triadi, “Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Korupsi Oleh Subjek Militer Saat Sedang Menduduki Jabatan Sipil”, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial 1, no. 4 (2023).

Yoses Ondrasi Telaumbanua, dkk, “Wewenang Kpk Dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Dilakukan Oleh Tni Aktif Dikaji Dari Teori Hukum Pembangunan”, ADVANCES in Social Humanities Research 1, no. 11 (2024).

Published
2026-04-30
How to Cite
Belseran, N., Pietersz, J., & Hattu, J. (2026). Kewenangan Penetapan Anggota TNI Sebagai Tersangka Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. PATTIMURA Law Study Review, 4(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.47268/palasrev.v4i1.23254
Section
HUKUM TATA NEGARA & HUKUM ADMINISTRASI NEGARA