Penerapan Prinsip Non Intervensi Dalam Hukuman Mati Terhadap Warga Negara Asing
Abstract
The ASEAN Charter has clear rules regarding respect for the principle of non-intervention. There is a misunderstanding between the application of the principle of non-intervention and the state responsibility, such as in cases relating to foreign nationals, namely the postponement of the execution of the death penalty against Mary Jane as a Philippine citizen. This raises questions regarding the actions of the Philippine government in handling the problems of its citizens in Indonesia which are considered acts of intervention because they contradict the determination of the death penalty verdict that has permanent legal force. The problems studied include: first, how is the regulation of the principle of non-intervention according to International Law. Second, whether the diplomatic efforts made by the State of the Philippines related to the postponement of the execution of the death penalty against its citizens is an act of violation of the principle of non-intervention. This research uses normative juridical method to find out whether the efforts made by the State of the Philippines is an act of violation of the principle of non-intervention according to International Law. From the research conducted, the conclusion follows that the principle of non-intervention is a principle relating to foreign subjects, meaning that the government must avoid intervening in a country's jurisdiction, but on this side must maintain diplomatic relations. As the Philippine government has done, by submitting appeals, cassations, clemency applications to judicial review. This is the Philippines' responsibility to protect its citizens, while the Indonesian government also has the responsibility to protect national interests. To balance the principle of non-intervention with the interests of cooperative relations in the form of diplomacy can be done by making national policies that have the opportunity to alleviate the death penalty sanctions for certain crimes such as drug crimes.
Downloads
References
Adolf, H. Aspek-aspek Negara Dalam Hukum Internasional. Jakarta: Grafindo, 2002.
Ady. Simak 7 Temuan Hasil Eksaminasi Putusan Mary Jane. hukumonline.com.
Ali, H. Z.. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2009.
Andriyanto, F. R., & Subekti. “Penundaan Eksekusi Pidana Mati Dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika (Studi Penundaan Eksekusi Terhadap Mary Jane Fiesta Veloso”. Jurnal Recidive 3, no. 3 (2014).
Ardhiwisastra, Y. B. Hukum Internasional Bunga Rampai. Bandung: Alumni, 2003.
Arman Anwar, V. J. B. Rehatta dkk. Hukum Internasional. Bandung: Widina Bhakti Persada, 2021.
Brierly, J. L.. The Law of Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1963.
Dewi, A. F. (2020). Diplomasi Indonesia dalam Penanganan Kasus Wilfrida Soik di Malaysia Tahun 2010-2015. Journal of International Relations 6, no. 3 (2020).
Gabrillin, A. Kronologi Diplomasi Filipina-Indonesia soal Mary Jane Versi Kejaksaan Agung . https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2015/04/29/22281211/Kronologi.Diplomasi.Filipina.Indonesia.soal.Mary.Jane.Versi.Kejaksaan.Agung.
Harruma, I. (t.thn.). Upaya Hukum Biasa Dalam Kasus Pidana. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2022/02/28/01000091/upaya-hukum-biasa-dalam-kasus-pidana.
Hutagulung, B. M. Hubungan Antara Perlindungan Diplomatik (Diplomatic Protection) Menurut Konvensi Wina 1961 Dan Konvensi WIna 1963 Dengan Perjanjian Bilateral Mandatory Consular Notification, Bandung: Skripsi, Universitas Katolik Parahyangan, 2019.
Julia, G., Sondakh, M. K., M., F. J., & Karisoh. “Pengaturan Hukum Mengenai Aparatur Hubungan Luar Negeri Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 1999 Tentang Hubungan Luar Negeri”. Jurnal Lex Administratum 3, no. 4 (2020).
Maryanti, I. Penjatuhan Hukuman Mati Terhadap Warga Negara Asing Pada Kasus Kejahatan Narkotika, Padang: Tesis, Universitas Andalas, 2018.
Montevideo, K. Montevideo Convention on Rights and Duties of States (1933) (hudok.info)
Nadlir, M. Solidaritas Buruh Migran Indonesia untuk Mary Jane. (viva.co.id)
Nufus, W. H. (t.thn.). Keluarga Terpidana Mati Mary Jane Datangi Komnas HAM, Dorong Grasi ke Jokowi. Dipetik Februari 28, 2024, dari Keluarga Terpidana Mati Mary Jane Datangi Komnas HAM, Dorong Grasi ke Jokowi (detik.com)
Otniel, Y. G., & Kangmajaya, A. F. “Cooperation Between Indonesia-Philippines on Combating Drugs in ASEAN”. Verity-UPH Journal of International Relations 12, no. 24 (2020).
Parry, & Grant. Encyclopaedic Dictionary of International Law. New York: Oceana Publication, Inc, 1986.
PBB, M. U. Resolusi 2131. https://legal.un.org/avl/pdf/ha/ga_2131-xx/ga_2131-xx_e.pdf
Pendidikan, G. Intervensi adalah. Diambil kembali dari Intervensi : Pengertian, Bentuk, Macam, Dampak & Contohnya (seputarilmu.com)
Philippines, C. The Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines, Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines
Politik, K. I.-H. https: / / www.ohchr.org / en / instrumentsmechanisms / instruments / international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights
Pohan, A. M. Prinsip Non-intervensi Dalam Perspektif ASEAN, Depok: Skripsi, Universitas Indonesia, 2009.
Prakoso, D., & Nurwachid. Studi Tentang Pendapat-Pendapat Mengenai Efektivitas Pidana Mati di Indonesia Dewasa Ini. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1984.
Rahmanto, T. Y. “Prinsip Non-intervensi Bagi ASEAN Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia”. Jurnal HAM 8, no. 2 (2017).
Siswoko, K. H. Tekanan Global Dalam Penundaan Eksekusi Terpidana Mati Di Indonesia. Jurnal komunikasi 8, no. 2 (2016).
Sefriani. Peran Hukum Internasional Dalam Hubungan Internasional Kontemporer. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo. 2016.
Setianingsih, S., & Wahyuningsih. Hukum Internasional. Tangerang: Universitas Terbuka, 2014.
Yanuar, N. Presiden Jokowi Didemo saat Kunjungan di Filipina, Massa Minta Mary Jane Dibebaskan dari Hukuman Mati. Indozone News.
Copyright (c) 2024 Fitri Maryam Wa Djuhardi, Popi Tuhulele, Dyah Ridhul Airin Daties (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
