Respon Cepat Unit Samapta Polsek Dalam Penanganan Laporan Emergency

  • Angga Edwi Bagus Irianto Program Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia.
  • Yahman Yahman Program Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Keywords: Quick Response, Samapta Unit, Police Authority, Administrative Law, Public Service

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal provisions governing the authority of the Police Sector Samapta Unit (Unit Samapta Polsek) in implementing quick response measures for handling emergency reports and to examine the juridical implementation of such authority based on the prevailing laws and regulations. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory and conceptual approaches. Legal materials were collected through library research consisting of legislation, legal doctrines, scholarly books, scientific journal articles, and official documents concerning police functions and public services. The collected materials were analyzed descriptively and analytically through legal interpretation by emphasizing the principles of legality, proportionality, professionalism, accountability, and good governance. The findings indicate that the authority of the Samapta Unit in implementing quick response has been adequately regulated under Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the Indonesian National Police, Law Number 25 of 2009 concerning Public Services, and Regulation of the Indonesian National Police Number 10 of 2021. Nevertheless, the study identifies a normative regulatory gap regarding legal standards for quick response implementation, particularly concerning response time indicators, parameters for first police actions, inter-unit coordination mechanisms, and service evaluation standards, which may lead to inconsistent implementation among police jurisdictions. The novelty of this research lies in its administrative law perspective in examining the authority of the Samapta Unit and emphasizing the need for strengthening legal regulations to ensure legal certainty and improve the quality of police public services.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adnyani, N. K. S. (2021). Kewenangan diskresi Kepolisian Republik Indonesia dalam penegakan hukum pidana. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial, 7(2), 135–144.

Astya, P. R., Mulyadi, A., & Meigawati, D. (2025). Service quality in handling public complaints at the Integrated Police Service Center (SPKT) of the Sukabumi City Police Resort. DIA: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 23(1), 374–383. https://doi.org/10.30996/dia.v22i02.11309

Dwiyanto, A. (2021). Mewujudkan good governance melalui pelayanan publik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Hadjon, P. M. (2011). Pengantar hukum administrasi Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Hanifah Is'aad, & Faturahman, M. R. (2024). Analisis beban administrasi pelayanan publik di Sentra Pelayanan Kepolisian Terpadu (SPKT) Kepolisian Daerah Jawa Tengah dalam perspektif New Public Service. YUSTISI, 11(1), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.32832/yustisi.v11i1.16196

Hafendi, D., & Silalahi, W. (2025). Diskresi sebagai instrumen penegakan hukum: Kajian terhadap kewenangan kepolisian berdasarkan Undang-Undang Kepolisian. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 5(12).

Kelsen, H. (2007). General theory of law and state. Clark, NY: The Lawbook Exchange. (Original work published 1945).

Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Penelitian hukum (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Kencana.

Peraturan Kepala Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2018 tentang Layanan Polisi 110.

Peraturan Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2021 tentang Pemolisian Masyarakat.

Peraturan Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2024 tentang Pengelolaan Pengaduan Masyarakat di Lingkungan Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia.

Peraturan Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 10 Tahun 2021 tentang Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia.

Pranata, A. Y. (2025). Performance of Polri's public services from a governance perspective on SATPAS, SAMSAT, and SPKT services at Polresta Malang Kota. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Public Administration and Governance (ICOPAG 2024). EAI. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.30-10-2024.2354772

Ratminto, & Winarsih, A. S. (2018). Manajemen pelayanan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Ridwan, H. R. (2023). Hukum administrasi negara (Edisi Revisi). Depok: Rajawali Pers.

Ridwan, J., & Sudrajat, A. S. (2020). Hukum administrasi negara dan kebijakan pelayanan publik. Bandung: Nuansa Cendekia.

Sedarmayanti. (2019). Good governance (Tata kelola pemerintahan yang baik). Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Sinambela, L. P. (2019). Reformasi pelayanan publik: Teori, kebijakan, dan implementasi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Suwondo, D. (2020). Efektivitas SPKT dalam layanan kepolisian. Jurnal Litbang Polri, 23(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.46976/litbangpolri.v23i1.98

Published
2026-08-31
How to Cite
Irianto, A., & Yahman, Y. (2026). Respon Cepat Unit Samapta Polsek Dalam Penanganan Laporan Emergency. PATTIMURA Law Study Review, 4(2), 44-57. https://doi.org/10.47268/palasrev.v4i2.27448
Section
HUKUM TATA NEGARA & HUKUM ADMINISTRASI NEGARA