Pengaturan Hukum Kewenangan Kepolisian Dalam Penerimaan Dan Penanganan Laporan Tindak Pidana

Dhanny Dwi Fajar; Yahman Yahman; Imam Suroso

doi:10.47268/palasrev.v4i2.27479

Dhanny Dwi Fajar Program Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Yahman Yahman Program Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Imam Suroso Program Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/palasrev.v4i2.27479

Keywords: Police Authority, Criminal Offence Reports, Legal Certainty, Legal Harmonisation, Law Enforcement

Abstract

The receipt and handling of criminal offence reports constitute the initial stage of the criminal justice process, determining both the effectiveness of law enforcement and the protection of citizens' rights. Although the authority of the Indonesian National Police is regulated under Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the Indonesian National Police, the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code, and Regulation of the Chief of the Indonesian National Police Number 6 of 2019 concerning Criminal Investigation, the existing regulatory framework remains fragmented, contains overlapping authorities, and has not established a comprehensive and integrated mechanism for receiving and processing criminal reports. This study aims to analyse the legal framework governing police authority in receiving and handling criminal offence reports and to formulate an ideal regulatory model capable of ensuring legal certainty, accountability, and the protection of citizens' rights. This research employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The legal materials consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources analysed through a prescriptive method based on library research. The findings reveal that the current regulations are dispersed across various legal instruments, resulting in inconsistent implementation of police authority, weak institutional coordination, and suboptimal oversight and public service mechanisms. Therefore, an ideal legal framework should integrate the principles of legality, due process of law, accountability, transparency, professionalism, proportionality, institutional harmonisation, and the utilisation of information technology within a comprehensive regulatory system. Such a framework is expected to strengthen legal certainty, improve the effectiveness of law enforcement, enhance the quality of police services, and increase public trust in Indonesia's criminal justice system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adnyani, Ni Ketut Sari. “Kewenangan Diskresi Kepolisian Republik Indonesia dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial 7, no. 2 (2021): 135–145. https://doi.org/10.23887/jiis.v7i2.37389.

Agung Hidayat. “Critical Review Buku Penelitian Hukum Peter Mahmud Marzuki: Penelitian Hukum Ad Quem tentang Norma.” YUSTISIA MERDEKA: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 7, no. 2 (2021): 117–125. https://doi.org/10.33319/yume.v7i2.109.

Akil, Ibrahim, et al. “Revolutionizing Report and Complaint Services at South Sumatra Police Criminal Investigation Sub-Directorate III.” PERSPEKTIF 13, no. 3 (2024): 652–658. https://doi.org/10.31289/perspektif.v13i3.11597.

Arif, Fahmi, dan Nur Hamida Kholif As Syafii. “Disharmoni Peraturan Kepolisian dengan Peraturan Kejaksaan dalam Pelaksanaan Keadilan Restoratif.” Legacy: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundang-undangan 3, no. 2 (2023): 161–180. https://doi.org/10.21274/legacy.2023.3.2.161-180.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2018.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Perihal Undang-Undang. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2023.

Dicey, A. V. Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1982.

Eldrina, Diana. “Implementasi Pasal 14 Peraturan Kepala Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2019 tentang Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Terkait Pengawasan Penyidikan (Studi di Polresta Pontianak Kota).” Jurnal Fatwa Hukum 4, no. 2 (2021).

Friedman, Lawrence M. The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1975.

Hadjon, Philipus M. Perlindungan Hukum bagi Rakyat di Indonesia. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu, 1987.

Hadjon, Philipus M. Tentang Wewenang. Surabaya: Yuridika, 1997.

Harahap, M. Yahya. Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Penyidikan dan Penuntutan. Edisi ke-2. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016.

HR, Ridwan. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Edisi Revisi. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2020.

Indonesia. Peraturan Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2019 tentang Penyidikan Tindak Pidana.

Laura Siagian, Santi, Pujiyono, dan Sukinta. “Implikasi Pluralisme Kewenangan Penyidikan dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Diponegoro Law Journal 5, no. 3 (2016).

Lubis, Irsyad Nursalim, Muhammad Yamin, dan Adil Akhyar. “Penerapan Peraturan Kapolri Nomor 6 Tahun 2019 tentang Penyidikan Tindak Pidana terhadap Proses Penegakan Hukum.” Jurnal Hukum Al-Hikmah 3, no. 2 (2022).

Mahfud MD, Moh. Membangun Politik Hukum, Menegakkan Konstitusi. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2020.

Manalu, Jericho Owen Geraldo, Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku, dan Ni Putu Rai Yuliartini. “Tinjauan Pengaturan Terkait Batas Waktu Peningkatan Status Laporan Polisi dari Penyelidikan ke Penyidikan Berdasarkan Perspektif Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).” Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum 4, no. 1 (2025): 5272–5278. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v4i1.4020.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana, 2021.

Muhaimin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram: Mataram University Press, 2020.

Murtadho, Nazhif Ali. “Illegally Obtained Evidence in Indonesia's Draft Criminal Procedure Code (RUU KUHAP): Exclusionary Rules and the Due Process of Law.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 25, no. 3 (2025): 291–308. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2025.V25.291-308.

Prakoesa, Petir Dahsyat Hadi, Dwi Wachidiyah Ningsih, dan Suyanto. “Tumpang Tindih Kewenangan Penyidikan Korupsi: Dampak terhadap Kepastian Hukum dan Due Process of Law.” Judge: Jurnal Hukum 6, no. 7 (2026): 1302–1310. https://doi.org/10.54209/judge.v6i07.1997.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2014.

Soekanto, Soerjono, dan Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2019.

Subnit, Mochammad Sochib, Setiyono, dan Indrawati. “Penanganan Laporan Pengaduan Masyarakat terhadap Proses Penyidikan Polri di Tingkat Polres dan Polsek.” MLJ Merdeka Law Journal 1, no. 1 (2020): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.26905/mlj.v1i1.4292.

Sukinta. “Peran Kepolisian dalam Melakukan Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Penyebaran Berita Bohong di Indonesia.” Administrative Law and Governance Journal 3, no. 3 (2020): 554–568. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v3i3.554-568.

Tallaut, Lambertus Josua, dan Ade Adhari. “Kepastian Hukum Penerapan Kriteria Kewenangan Penyidikan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Republik Indonesia.” Jurnal Analisis Hukum 5, no. 1 (2022): 26–39. https://doi.org/10.38043/jah.v5i1.3426.

Utrecht, E. Pengantar dalam Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Ichtiar Baru, 1983.

Wahyudi, Endik, Bayu Dwi Anggono, Dominikus Rato, dan I Gede Widhiana Suarda. “The Principle of Legal Certainty in the Termination of Investigations by Police Investigators into Police Reports.” Lex Journal: Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan 10, no. 1 (2026): 77–84. https://doi.org/10.25139/lex.v10i1.11398.