Pengaturan Hukum Penyelidikan dan Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Pencurian Dengan Pemberatan Dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum
Abstract
The investigation and criminal inquiry process for aggravated theft constitutes a fundamental stage in criminal law enforcement, as it provides the evidentiary basis for judicial proceedings. Although regulated under the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code, Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the Indonesian National Police, and various implementing regulations, the existing legal framework continues to face several weaknesses, including regulatory disharmony, the absence of specific provisions addressing the distinctive characteristics of aggravated theft, and the lack of optimal integration among the components of the criminal justice system. This study aims to analyze the weaknesses of the current legal framework and formulate an ideal legal model governing the investigation and criminal inquiry of aggravated theft offenses. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Legal materials consist of legislation, legal literature, scholarly journals, and other relevant legal documents, which are analyzed using a prescriptive legal approach. The findings indicate that the principal weaknesses lie in the lack of harmonization between substantive criminal law and criminal procedural law, the fragmentation of regulations across various legal instruments, the absence of specific procedural guidelines for aggravated theft investigations, and inadequate coordination within the integrated criminal justice system. An ideal legal framework should therefore emphasize regulatory harmonization, legal certainty, protection of human rights, standardized procedural guidelines, the utilization of information technology, and stronger coordination and supervisory mechanisms among law enforcement institutions. Such reforms are expected to establish investigation and criminal inquiry processes that are professional, accountable, effective, and consistent with the principles of justice and the rule of law.
Downloads
References
Abidin, Petra Oudi Zainal. “Perlindungan Hak-Hak Tersangka terhadap Potensi Pelanggaran Penyidik Berdasarkan KUHAP.” Lex Administratum 10, no. 2 (2022).
Arief, Barda Nawawi. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana: Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
Arif, Fahmi, dan Nur Hamida Kholif As Syafii. “Disharmoni Peraturan Kepolisian dengan Peraturan Kejaksaan dalam Pelaksanaan Keadilan Restoratif.” Legacy: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundang-undangan 3, no. 2 (2023): 161–180. https://doi.org/10.21274/legacy.2023.3.2.161-180.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2018.
Atmasasmita, Romli. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Kontemporer. Jakarta: Kencana, 2011.
Hamzah, Andi. Delik-Delik Tertentu (Speciale Delicten) di dalam KUHP. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2021.
Harahap, M. Yahya. Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Penyidikan dan Penuntutan. Edisi ke-2, Cetakan ke-16. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2019.
Ibrahim, Johnny. Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2006.
Imran, Suwitno Yutye, Abdul Madjid, dan Apripari. “Expansion of Interpretation of Phrase of Preliminary Investigation Stages Through Systematic Interpretation as a Solution to Prejudicial Dispute.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 23, no. 3 (2023): 341–356. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2023.V23.341-356.
Johan Rofi, Fauzie Yusuf Hasibuan, dan Lilik Mulyadi. “Integration of Legal Certainty and Restorative Justice in the Phases of General Criminal Investigation: An Examination of Law Enforcement by the Indonesian National Police.” International Journal of Law and Society 2, no. 2 (2025): 40–53. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijls.v2i2.346.
Kurdi, Adery Ardhan, dan Teuku Ahmad Dadek. “Transformasi Penegakan Due Process of Law dalam Tahapan Penyidikan di Indonesia: Antara Perlindungan Hak Tersangka dan Efektivitas Penegakan Hukum.” Legal Standing: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 10, no. 1 (2026): 33–45. https://doi.org/10.24269/ls.v10i1.12833.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana, 2021.
Muhaimin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram: Mataram University Press, 2020.
Muladi. Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 1995.
Pulungan, Muh Hajoran, dan Mosgan Situmorang. “Restorative Justice in the New Criminal Procedure Code: Between Legal Certainty and Law Enforcement Officer Discretion.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 26, no. 1 (2026): 45–60. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2026.V26.045-060.
Putriyana, Ayu, dan Yuliana. “Transforming the Investigation Process by the Police Based on the Perspective of the Criminal Justice System.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 26, no. 2 (2026): 109–126. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2026.V26.109-126.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2014.
Reano, Arfan, dan Boedi Prasetyo. “Implementation of Punishment for Perpetrators of Aggravated Theft Based on the New Criminal Code.” Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review 20, no. 4 (2025). https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.v20i4.1397.
Roni, Bastianto Nugroho, dan Supolo Setyo Wibowo. “Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Pencurian dengan Pemberatan (Studi Kasus Perkara Nomor 1701/Pid.B/2024/PN Sby).” Journal Evidence of Law 4, no. 3 (2025): 1269–1275. https://doi.org/10.59066/jel.v4i3.1563.
Soekanto, Soerjono, dan Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Edisi Revisi. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2019.
Tallaut, Lambertus Josua, dan Ade Adhari. “Kepastian Hukum Penerapan Kriteria Kewenangan Penyidikan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Republik Indonesia.” Jurnal Analisis Hukum 5, no. 1 (2022): 26–39. https://doi.org/10.38043/jah.v5i1.3426.
Wahyudi, Endik, Bayu Dwi Anggono, Dominikus Rato, dan I Gede Widhiana Suarda. “The Principle of Legal Certainty in the Termination of Investigations by Police Investigators into Police Reports.” Lex Journal: Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan 10, no. 1 (2026): 77–84. https://doi.org/10.25139/lex.v10i1.11398.
Zulnaedi, Diki, dan Bambang Tri Bawono. “Effectiveness of Investigations into Aggravated Theft Crimes.” Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah 20, no. 4 (2025): 2781–2796. https://doi.org/10.30659/jhku.v20i4.49496.
Copyright (c) 2026 Sugiarto Sugiarto, Karim Karim, Jonaedi Efendi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
