Pengaturan Penegakan Hukum Pelanggaran Lalu Lintas Dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum Untuk Mewujudkan Kepatuhan Hukum Masyarakat

Sujito Sujito; Karim Karim; Jonaedi Efendi

doi:10.47268/palasrev.v4i2.27488

Sujito Sujito Program Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Karim Karim Program Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Jonaedi Efendi Program Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/palasrev.v4i2.27488

Keywords: Law Enforcement, Traffic Violations, Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement, Legal Certainty, Legal Compliance

Abstract

Traffic law enforcement is a fundamental instrument for ensuring road safety, public order, and legal certainty. Although the implementation of Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement (ETLE) has improved the effectiveness of technology-based traffic enforcement, its application continues to encounter normative challenges, particularly regarding regulatory harmonization, legal certainty in electronic evidence, protection of citizens' rights, and the determination of legal responsibility for electronically detected traffic violations. This study aims to analyze the formulation of traffic law enforcement regulations capable of ensuring legal certainty while enhancing public legal compliance. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, analyzed prescriptively based on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The findings indicate that regulatory reform should focus on harmonizing legislation, strengthening legal certainty in electronic evidence mechanisms, clarifying institutional authority, establishing continuous regulatory evaluation, and reinforcing the principles of transparency, accountability, and protection of citizens' rights. Furthermore, improving public legal compliance requires strengthening legal education, utilizing digital technology as an educational medium, encouraging public participation, and fostering a stronger legal culture. Such a regulatory formulation is expected to establish an adaptive traffic law enforcement system that provides legal certainty while promoting sustainable public compliance with traffic regulations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Achmad Ali. Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) dan Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudence). Vol. 1. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.

Aditya, Zaka Firma. “Does the Judiciary Support Legal Certainty? An Indonesian Perspective.” Frontiers in Law 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.6000/2817-2302.2023.02.03.

Airlangga, Ubaidillah Arya Wahyu, dan Pramukhtiko Suryokencono. “Sinkronisasi Hukum Pengaturan Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement (ETLE) Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 tentang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan.” Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice 1, no. 4 (2024).

Dahlan, Muhammad, Husni Jalil, Darmawan, dan Sulaiman Tripa. “Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement (ETLE) Policy: The Principle of Legal Certainty in a Rule of Law.” PETITA: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Syariah 8, no. 2 (2023): 275–289. https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v8i2.214.

Doly. “Penegakan Hukum terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 tentang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan: Tantangan dan Prospek.” Kajian 20, no. 3 (2015): 221–238.

Friedman, Lawrence M. The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1975.

Ibrahim, Johnny. Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2013.

Indrati S., Maria Farida. Ilmu Perundang-undangan: Jenis, Fungsi, dan Materi Muatan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2020.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana, 2021.

Pardede, Charles Rio Valentine. “Implementasi Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement (ETLE) dalam Mendukung Terwujudnya Road Safety Policing.” Jurnal Litbang Polri 25, no. 1 (2022): 15–31.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2014.

Rahman, Abdul. “Optimalisasi Fungsi Lalu Lintas Polri dalam Penerapan Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement Guna Mewujudkan Budaya Tertib Berlalu Lintas.” Jurnal Litbang Polri 24, no. 3 (2021): 85–106. https://doi.org/10.46976/.v24i3.156.

Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia.

Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan.

Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 tentang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan.

Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2022 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan.

Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.

Setiawan, Meutia, dan Prihantika. “Implementasi Kebijakan Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement (ETLE) di Kota Bandar Lampung.” Administrativa 5, no. 1 (2023): 1–16.

Sidrajat, Kurniawan Afriyan, Syachdin, dan Ansar. “Kepastian Hukum Administratif dalam Penerapan Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement (ETLE) terhadap Pemilik Kendaraan di Wilayah Polda Sulawesi Tengah.” Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Business Law 7, no. 1 (2026): 98–114. https://doi.org/10.22437/zaaken.v7i1.54418.

Soekanto, Soerjono. Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2019.

Soekanto, Soerjono, dan Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2019.

Sudikno Mertokusumo. Mengenal Hukum: Suatu Pengantar. Edisi Revisi. Yogyakarta: CV. Maha Karya Pustaka, 2019.

Wardana, Rizky, Iqbal Arysepta Imam Mahbi, dan Nabila Annisa Fuzain. “Implementasi Penegakan Hukum Berbasis Teknologi Informasi terhadap Penggunaan Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement bagi Pelanggar Lalu Lintas oleh Lembaga Kepolisian.” Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 5, no. 8 (2024): 639–655. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v5i8.513.