Peran Unit Propam Polsek Gedeg dalam Penegakan Disiplin Polri untuk Menjaga Profesionalitas dan Integritas

Mukhamad Taufik; Vera Rimbawany Susanty

doi:10.47268/palasrev.v4i2.27499

Mukhamad Taufik Program Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Vera Rimbawany Susanty Program Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/palasrev.v4i2.27499

Keywords: Propam Unit, Disciplinary Enforcement, Authority, Professionalism, Integrity

Abstract

This study examines the role of the Professional and Security Division (Propam) Unit at Gedeg Sector Police in enforcing discipline among Indonesian National Police personnel as part of efforts to maintain professionalism and integrity. The research focuses on the legal regulation governing the role of the Propam Unit in enforcing police personnel discipline, as well as the position, role, and limits of authority of the Propam Unit at Gedeg Sector Police in its implementation. This study employs a normative legal research method using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Legal materials were analyzed qualitatively through inventory, classification, systematization, and interpretation of relevant legal provisions and scholarly literature. The results show that the Propam Unit serves as an internal supervisory element within the Indonesian National Police, with roles in personnel development and prevention of violations, receiving public complaints, conducting preliminary examinations, maintaining internal security, and supporting disciplinary enforcement processes. The implementation of these roles must be based on clear legal grounds, procedures, and distribution of authority. The Propam Unit does not have the authority to independently impose disciplinary sanctions; rather, it performs supervisory and examination functions within the hierarchical organizational structure of the Indonesian National Police. Therefore, the effectiveness of the Propam Unit depends on clear limits of authority, objective examinations, accountability, and consistent application of the principles of legality, professionalism, and proportionality in enforcing police personnel discipline.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alhdapassa, T. “Analisis Penyelesaian Perkara Disiplin oleh Anggota POLRI dalam Melaksanakan Tugas Pokok dan Wewenangnya di Korlantas POLRI.” Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan 9, no. 9 (2023).

Arnold, Osgar S. Matompo, and Syamsul Haling. “Efektivitas Profesi dan Pengamanan dalam Penegakan Sanksi bagi Anggota Polri: Professional Effectiveness and Security in Enforcement Sanctions for Police Member.” Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains 4, no. 4 (2021): 176–184.

Hermansyah, Ruslan Renggong, and Basri Oner. “Penegakan Sanksi Pelanggaran Terhadap Disiplin Anggota Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Daerah Sulawesi Selatan.” Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law 6, no. 1 (2023): 157–162.

Immanuel, Fran. Analisis Yuridis Peran Propam Kepolisian Daerah Sumatera Utara dalam Melakukan Penegakan Hukum terhadap Anggota Kepolisian. n.d.

Indah, Oktiane Bulan, Wulan Febianty, and Zalfaa Hafiz Anabresta. “Etika dan Integritas Polisi.” HUMANITIS: Jurnal Humaniora, Sosial dan Bisnis 2, no. 6 (2024): 610–614.

Klockars, Carl B., Sanja Kutnjak Ivkovich, and Maria R. Haberfeld. “Enhancing Police Integrity.” NIJ Research for Practice (2025).

Lutfi, Muktar, and Muhammad Ridwan Lubis. “Analisis Yuridis Pelanggaran Kode Etik Profesi Polri oleh Personel Satuan Brimob Polda Sumatera Utara yang Melakukan Kasus Tindak Pidana.” Neraka Keadilan (2025).

Ngurah, A. A. N. Manik Oka, Made Sugi Hartono, and Muhamad Jodi Setianto. “Peran Propam dalam Penegakan Kode Etik Kepolisian Republik Indonesia Berdasarkan Ketentuan Pasal 17 Peraturan Kepala Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2011 tentang Kode Etik Profesi Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia di Kepolisian Resor Buleleng.” Jurnal Komunikasi Yustisia 5, no. 2 (2022): 515–530.

Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2002 Nomor 2. Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4168

Rimbing, Merlin Paquita. “Kewenangan Propam dalam Menegakkan Disiplin Anggota Kepolisian (Studi Kasus Pelanggaran Disiplin Anggota di Wilayah Polda Sulut).” Lex Crimen 13, no. 3 (2025).

Said, Muhammad Nasir, Faissal Malik, and Rusdin Alauddin. “Efektivitas Kinerja Penyidik Profesi dan Pengamanan (Propam) dalam Upaya Penegakan Disiplin Polri di Polda Maluku Utara.” Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia 7, no. 2 (2022).

Sugiri. “Pemahaman Kedudukan dan Fungsi Polri dalam Struktur Organisasi Sistem Kenegaraan.” Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian 17, no. 3 (2023).

Suharni, Melaniati, Kalistus Gaudensius Wayong Huler, Bernadus Febryanto, and Dwityas Witarti Rabawati. “Penegakan Kode Etik Profesi Kepolisian.” Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial 3, no. 1 (2023): 151–159.

Sunardi, Anang. “Strategi Penegakan Disiplin Anggota Polri di Satuan Kerja Yanma Polda Metro Jaya.” Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis Terapan 6, no. 1 (2023).

Supriyadi, Tugimin, Adinda Putri Dewi, Wanda Fitri Berliana, Putri Fairuz Hidayat, and Ira Dinanti Hariyanto. “Pengaruh Etika dan Integritas terhadap Penyimpangan pada Anggota Polisi di Indonesia.” ADMIN: Jurnal Administrasi Negara 2, no. 4 (2024): 195–203.

Yakin, Ipa Hafisiah. “Pengaruh Kode Etik Profesi Polri dan Disiplin Kerja Anggota Polri terhadap Komitmen Organisasi di Lingkungan Polres Sumedang.” Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai 7, no. 3 (2023): 21896–21908.