Keterkaitan Data Pribadi Terhadap Rahasia Dagang Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Rahasia Dagang

  • Aditya Yoga William Sitania Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia.
  • Teng Berlianty Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia.
  • Theresia Nolda Agnes Narwadan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia.
Keywords: Relationship, Personal Data, Trade Secrets

Abstract

The connection of personal data as business information must receive protection based on the definition of trade secret as explained in Article 1 point 1 of Law no. 30 of 2000. Legal protection of personal data which is considered business information can be carried out by referring to Law no. 30 of 2000 concerning Trade Secrets and regulations governing Personal Data in Indonesia. The research method used is normative juridical with a problem approach to legislation and a conceptual approach. Sources of legal materials used include primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Management of legal materials is carried out qualitatively to answer the problems faced. Analysis of the relationship between trade secrets and personal data in this research was carried out by considering the elements of information, economic value and confidentiality as regulated in Article 1 of Law no. 30 of 2000. Confidentiality must be maintained and requires permission from the owner. Individual personal data, including consumer lists, is business information that has economic value because it supports business policy making. Misuse of this data can endanger the information controller. When personal data leaks occur, economic value and related confidentiality can be threatened. The research results show that acts of misuse of personal data can be subject to sanctions based on Articles 13 and 14 of the Trade Secrets Law and Article 32 paragraphs (1) and (3) of the Information and Electronic Transactions Law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Atmajaya. “Rahasia Dagang: Informasi Komersial di Bidang Teknologi/Bisnis.” https://atmajaya.ac.

Budi, Henry Soelistyo, dan Suyud Margono, ed. Bunga Rampai Hak atas Kekayaan Intelektual (HAKI): Kumpulan Esai. Jakarta: Perhimpunan Masyarakat HAKI Indonesia, 2001.

Djumhana, M., dan R. Djubaedillah. Hak Milik Intelektual: Sejarah, Teori, dan Prakteknya di Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1997.

Erna, P. “Pentingnya Perlindungan Data Pribadi dalam Transaksi Pinjaman Online (The Urgency of Personal Protection in Peer to Peer Lending).” Majalah Hukum Nasional 2 (2019): 1–27.

European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights and Council of Europe. Handbook on European Data Protection Law. Edited by Council of Europe, 2014.

Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia dan Cyber Law Center Fakultas Hukum. Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang Perlindungan Data Pribadi. 2015.

Lie, Haakon Thue. “Introduction to Current Trade Secret Management Research.” Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2020.

Lindsey, Tim, Eddy Damian, Simon Butt, dan Tomi Suryo Utomo. Hak Kekayaan Intelektual: Suatu Pengantar. Bandung: Alumni, 2011.

Nainggolan, Bernard. Pemberdayaan Hukum Hak Cipta dan Lembaga Manajemen Kolektif. Bandung: Alumni, 2011.

Soegarda, Witjaksana. “Kerjasama ASEAN di Bidang Hak atas Kekayaan Intelektual (HAKI).” Jakarta: Proyek Peningkatan Kerjasama ASEAN, Direktorat Jenderal Sekretariat Nasional ASEAN, Departemen Luar Negeri Republik Indonesia, 1998.

Sudaryat, Sudjana, dan Rika Ratna Permata. Hak Kekayaan Intelektual: Memahami Prinsip Dasar, Cakupan, dan Undang-Undang yang Berlaku. Bandung: Oase Media, 2010.

Sunggono, Bambang. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2016.

Sutedi, Adrian. Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2013.

Yuniarti, S. “Perlindungan Hukum Data Pribadi di Indonesia.” Jurnal Becoss 1, no. 1 (2019): 147–154.

Published
2026-08-31
How to Cite
Sitania, A., Berlianty, T., & Narwadan, T. (2026). Keterkaitan Data Pribadi Terhadap Rahasia Dagang Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Rahasia Dagang. PATTIMURA Law Study Review, 4(2), 166-175. https://doi.org/10.47268/palasrev.v4i2.28741