THE INFLUENCE OF DEBATE TECHNIQUE, AND STUDENTS' CRITICAL THINKING TOWARDS THEIR SPEAKING ABILITY

  • Djena Ali Prodi Pend. Bahasa Inggris Universitas Pattimura
  • Threesje Roza Souisa Prodi Pend. Bahasa Inggris Universitas Pattimura
Keywords: Debate Technique, Critical Thinking, Speaking Ability

Abstract

This study is aimed at a) describing the students   speaking   ability   and   their   critical thinking level, b) finding out the significant influence   of   speaking   ability   between   the students who are taught with debate technique and those who are taught with group discussion technique, c) finding out the significant differences in speaking ability between the students  who  have  high  critical  thinking  and those who have low critical thinking, and d) finding out the significant interaction in speaking ability between teaching techniques and critical thinking   skill.The   quasi-experiment   method under  a   quantitative  approach  was   used  to conduct the study. The design of the study is 2x2 with pre-post-test control group design. In analyzing the data, descriptive and inferential statistics were used. The results show that the students‟ speaking ability is in the high level, whereas in critical thinking skill there were 48 students who can be categorized as having high critical thinking and 32 students who have low critical thinking. The students who are taught by using debate technique have better achievement in  speaking ability than  those who  are  taught with  discussion technique. There is  a  positive and  significant influence on  students speaking ability between the students who are taught by debate technique with those who are taught with discussion technique. There is a positive and significant difference in speaking ability between the students who have high critical thinking and those who have low critical thinking. There is a positive and significant interaction of speaking ability between the teaching techniques and critical thinking.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aungwatanakun. S. (1994). English Teaching Methodology, (2nd)., Bangkok:
Chulalongkorn University Press. http://ijssh.org/papers/164-A10036.pdf
Brown, H.D. (2004). Language assessment: Principle and classroom practices.
New York: Pearson Education.
Cameron, Lyne. 2001. Teaching Languages to Young Learners. Trumpington Street: Cambridge University Press. http://ejournal-s1.stkip-pgri- sumbar.ac.id/index.php/Inggris/article/view/1306/1297
Derwing, Tracey M. and Munro Murray J. (2005). Second Language Accent and Pronunciation Teaching: A Research-Based Approach. TESOL Quarterly, Vol.39, No. 3 (Sep. 2005), pp. 379-397 Published by Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc. (TESOL)http://www.hawaii.edu/eli/resources/listening/readings/Derwing%20&
%20Munr o%202005.pdf
Harry,M & P.Mc.Can (1994). Assessment. Oxford:OUP Hornby, A.S (1995). Oxford Advance learner‟s Dictionary. Great Britain: Oxford University Press. http://download.portalgaruda.org/article.php?article=9794&val=627
Lipman, Matthew (1988). Philosophy for Children and Critical Thinking. The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 7(4);40-42.



Nisbett, Richard E. (2003). The Geography of Thought. New York : Newbury House. Paul, R. and Elder, L. (2006). The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and
Tools. Dillon Beach: Foundation for Critical Thinking Press.
Richards, J.C. (2006) Communicative Language Teaching Today. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://repositori.uvic.cat/bitstream/handle/10854/3365/trealu_a2014_paulista_sa ndra_application_communicative_language.pdf?sequence=1
Rubiati. R. (2010). Improving Students‟ Speaking Skill Through Debate Technique (A Classroom Action Research with First Semester Students of English Language Teaching Department Tarbiyah Faculty at IAIN Walisongo Semarang in the Academic Year of 2010/2011). http://library.walisongo.ac.id/digilib/files/disk1/122/jtptiain-gdl-richarubia-
6100-1-skripsi-p.pdf
Sanavi. R. V &Tarighat. S. (2014). Critical Thinking and Speaking Proficiency: A Mixed-method Study. Islamic Azad University, Roodehen Branch, Tehran, Iran. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 79-87, January 2014. © 2014 ACADEMY PUBLISHER Manufactured in Finland. doi:10.4304/tpls.4.1.79-87 http://www. academypublication.com/issues
/past/tpls/vol04 /01/12.pdf
Shumin, K. (2002). Factors to Consider: Developing Adults EFL Students‟ Speaking Abilities in Richards. W. Renandya (Eds.) Methodology in Language Teaching. http://lap.najah.edu/sites/default/files/Developing%20Adult%20EFL%20Studen ts%27%20Speaking%20Abilities.pdf
Tumposky NR. (2004) The Debate. The Clearing House. Vol. 78: 42-55. http://faculty.piercecollege.edu/kudlers/Debate%20Article.pdf
Wohlpart. Jim. (2007). Critical Thinking: Read and Analyze Arguments. Spring.
Zare. P & Othman. M. (2015). Students‟ Perceptions toward Using Classroom Debate to Develop Critical Thinking and Oral Communication Ability. Asian Social Science; Vol. 11, No. 9; 2015. ISSN 1911-2017 E-ISSN 1911-2025. Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education. http:// csenet.org/journal/ index.php/ass/article/ download/47157/ 5544
Zhang, L. (2003, November). Contributions of Thinking Styles to Critical Thinking
Dispositions. Journal of Psychology, 137(6), 517-543.
Ventura,M, Lai, E & DiCerbo, K. (2017). Skills for today: What we know about teaching and assessing critical thinking. London: Pearson.
Published
2019-04-05