VARIATIONS IN THE USE OF MAKE A MATCH LEARNING MODELS, SCRAMBLE LEARNING MODELS, AND CONVENTIONAL LEARNING MODELS TO IMPROVE STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES

  • Carolina Selfisina Ayal
  • Binti Rohmawati Universitas Pattimura
  • Taufan Talib Universitas Pattimura
Keywords: learning outcomes, variations in the use of learning models, make a match, scramble, conventional

Abstract

Variations in the use of various mathematical learning models are expected to provide an overview of the ability of students to understand mathematical concepts. This study aimed to determine the variation of students' mathematics learning outcomes by using the make a match learning model, the scramble learning model, and the Conventional learning model. Using the quasi-experimental method, the make a match and scramble learning model was applied as the independent variable and the conventional learning model as the control variable. Statistically, the F test was used to show that there was a difference in the mean with the value of Fcount = 4.22 > Ftable = 3.18, and Tukey's HSD analysis showed a value of 14.18 and compared to the group mean, it was concluded that the use of the make a match learning model gave the better learning result value between scramble and conventional learning models

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aunurrahman. (2014). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta

Komalasari, Kokom. (2013). Pembelajaran Kontekstual Konsep dan Aplikasi. Bandung: Refika Aditaman

Kusmanto, H. (2017). Pengaruh penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe make a match terhadap kreativitas siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika. Eduma: Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 32-42

Kurniasih, Imas & B. Sani. (2015). Ragam Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kata Pena

Ratumanan, T. G. (2015). Inovasi Pembelajaran, Mengembangkan Kompetensi Peserta Didik Secara Optimal. Yogyakarta: Ombak

Sani, Ridwan A. (2013). Inovasi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Setyosari, P. (2017). Menciptakan pembelajaran yang efektif dan berkualitas. Jinotep (jurnal inovasi dan teknologi pembelajaran): kajian dan riset dalam teknologi pembelajaran, 1(1), 20-30

Shoimin, Aris. (2013). 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media

Souhoka, F. P., Ayal, C. S., & Laamena, C. M. (2019). Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Siswa Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Make a Match dan Model Pembelajaran Konvensional Pada Materi Statistika. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Pattimura (pp. 33-40)

Sulistiani, E., & Masrukan, M. (2017, February). Pentingnya berpikir kritis dalam pembelajaran matematika untuk menghadapi tantangan MEA. In PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika (pp. 605-612)

Sukardi. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Suyadi. (2013). Strategi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Karkater. Jakarta: Remaja, Rosdakarya

Zein, M. (2016). Peran guru dalam pengembangan pembelajaran. Jurnal Inspiratif Pendidikan, 5(2), 274-285

Published
2022-10-20
How to Cite
Ayal, C., Rohmawati, B., & Talib, T. (2022). VARIATIONS IN THE USE OF MAKE A MATCH LEARNING MODELS, SCRAMBLE LEARNING MODELS, AND CONVENTIONAL LEARNING MODELS TO IMPROVE STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES. Science Map Journal, 4(2), 74-81. https://doi.org/10.30598/jmsvol4issue2pp74-81