Rekomendasi Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Kepada Komisi Pemilihan Umum Dalam Menangani Pelanggaran Pemilu Pasca Penetapan Hasil Perolehan Suara Secara Nasional

  • Gilbert Marc Baljanan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
  • Hendrik Salmon Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
  • Sherlock Halmes Lekipiouw Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Keywords: Bawaslu, Administrative Violation, Eelection Results

Abstract

Election administration violations, based on article 460 of the Election Law, Bawaslu has a maximum working time of 14 days to issue recommendations or decisions. Bawaslu's recommendations must be followed up by the KPU by issuing a decision letter no later than 3 days, as explained in Article 462. This problem occurs when the national vote results have been determined, then any dispute that occurs becomes the domain of the Constitutional Court. However, if a violation of election administration is found or reported, it must be followed up and decided by Bawaslu because it is based on article 454 paragraph 6 of the Election Law. The problem discussed by the author is Bawaslu's recommendation to be followed up by the KPU to change the determination of vote acquisition and the legal consequences that will be given if Bawaslu's recommendation is not followed up by the KPU. This writing uses a normative juridical research type, with a statutory regulation approach, a conceptual approach and a case approach.The research results show that regarding the legal force of Bawaslu's recommendation to change the vote tally, Bawaslu certainly has that legal force, because it is not legally prohibited. In connection with the follow-up to Bawaslu's recommendations to the KPU regarding violations of election administration, if the recommendations given by Bawaslu are not followed up by the KPU, they will be faced with various consequences, namely that the KPU can be reported by Bawaslu because it is related to the election organizer's code of ethics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Teguh Prasetyo. S., Penetapan Hasil, Pemilu Lanjutan, Pemantauan, dan Pendanaan Pemilu. Jakarta: Nusamedia, 2021.

Y Pattinasarany, “Keabsahan Surat Edaran Yang Muatan Materinya Bersifat Pengaturan dan Sanksi”, Jurnal Saniri, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2022.

Peter Mahfud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Jakrata: Prenada Media, 2017.

Surbakti, Ramlan. Efektivitas Pemerintahan Demokrasi Presidensial, Jakarta: Prisma35, 2016.

Sofyan, A., Fahruroji. Konsep Memperdalam Demokrasi, Malang: Instrans Publishing, 2016.

Bawaslu RI, Indeks Kerawanan Pemilu, Jakarta: Bawaslu RI, 2020.

Khairul Fahmi dan Ratna Dwi Pettalolo, Kajian Evaluatif Penanganan Pelanggaran Pemilu, Jakarta: Bawaslu RI, 2020.

Abdul Rasyid Thalib, Wewenang Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Implikasinya dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan RI, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2021.

Edgar Bodenheimer, Treatise on Justice, New York: Philosophical Library Inc., 2017.

Jemly Asshiddiqie, Penguatan Sistem Ketatanegaraan di Indonesia, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016.

Sherlock H., Lekipiouw, “Konstruksi Penataan Daerah Dan Model Pembagian Urusan Pemerintahan”, Jurnal Sasi, Vol. 26, No. 4, 2020.

Jemly Asshiddiqie, Etika Penyelenggara Pemilu, Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada, 2013.

Ayoub, A., & Ellis, A. Electoral Justice: The International IDEA Handbook, Swedia: Internasional IDEA, 2010.

Published
2024-11-25
How to Cite
Baljanan, G., Salmon, H., & Lekipiouw, S. (2024). Rekomendasi Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Kepada Komisi Pemilihan Umum Dalam Menangani Pelanggaran Pemilu Pasca Penetapan Hasil Perolehan Suara Secara Nasional. CAPITAN: Constitutional Law & Administrative Law Review, 2(2), 98-108. https://doi.org/10.47268/capitan.v2i2.16333