Rekomendasi Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Kepada Komisi Pemilihan Umum Dalam Menangani Pelanggaran Pemilu Pasca Penetapan Hasil Perolehan Suara Secara Nasional
Abstract
Election administration violations, based on article 460 of the Election Law, Bawaslu has a maximum working time of 14 days to issue recommendations or decisions. Bawaslu's recommendations must be followed up by the KPU by issuing a decision letter no later than 3 days, as explained in Article 462. This problem occurs when the national vote results have been determined, then any dispute that occurs becomes the domain of the Constitutional Court. However, if a violation of election administration is found or reported, it must be followed up and decided by Bawaslu because it is based on article 454 paragraph 6 of the Election Law. The problem discussed by the author is Bawaslu's recommendation to be followed up by the KPU to change the determination of vote acquisition and the legal consequences that will be given if Bawaslu's recommendation is not followed up by the KPU. This writing uses a normative juridical research type, with a statutory regulation approach, a conceptual approach and a case approach.The research results show that regarding the legal force of Bawaslu's recommendation to change the vote tally, Bawaslu certainly has that legal force, because it is not legally prohibited. In connection with the follow-up to Bawaslu's recommendations to the KPU regarding violations of election administration, if the recommendations given by Bawaslu are not followed up by the KPU, they will be faced with various consequences, namely that the KPU can be reported by Bawaslu because it is related to the election organizer's code of ethics.
Downloads
References
Teguh Prasetyo. S., Penetapan Hasil, Pemilu Lanjutan, Pemantauan, dan Pendanaan Pemilu. Jakarta: Nusamedia, 2021.
Y Pattinasarany, “Keabsahan Surat Edaran Yang Muatan Materinya Bersifat Pengaturan dan Sanksi”, Jurnal Saniri, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2022.
Peter Mahfud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Jakrata: Prenada Media, 2017.
Surbakti, Ramlan. Efektivitas Pemerintahan Demokrasi Presidensial, Jakarta: Prisma35, 2016.
Sofyan, A., Fahruroji. Konsep Memperdalam Demokrasi, Malang: Instrans Publishing, 2016.
Bawaslu RI, Indeks Kerawanan Pemilu, Jakarta: Bawaslu RI, 2020.
Khairul Fahmi dan Ratna Dwi Pettalolo, Kajian Evaluatif Penanganan Pelanggaran Pemilu, Jakarta: Bawaslu RI, 2020.
Abdul Rasyid Thalib, Wewenang Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Implikasinya dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan RI, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2021.
Edgar Bodenheimer, Treatise on Justice, New York: Philosophical Library Inc., 2017.
Jemly Asshiddiqie, Penguatan Sistem Ketatanegaraan di Indonesia, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016.
Sherlock H., Lekipiouw, “Konstruksi Penataan Daerah Dan Model Pembagian Urusan Pemerintahan”, Jurnal Sasi, Vol. 26, No. 4, 2020.
Jemly Asshiddiqie, Etika Penyelenggara Pemilu, Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada, 2013.
Ayoub, A., & Ellis, A. Electoral Justice: The International IDEA Handbook, Swedia: Internasional IDEA, 2010.
Copyright (c) 2024 Gilbert Marc Baljanan, Hendrik Salmon, Sherlock Halmes Lekipiouw (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)