Peer Review Process

All manuscripts are checked by qualified peer review and the authors are subject to blind-peer review whose identities will remain anonymous. The peer review process will be done after the initial screening by the consulting editors of the editorial board. The reviewers, who will perform the blind-peer reviews, comprise renowned national and international academicians and practitioners specializing in various mathematics education fields.
  1. Editor receives manuscript
  2. Reviewers read and provide comments to the editor
  3. The decision is made by the reviewer: accept, minor revisions, major revisions, or reject
  4. Feedback sent to an author
  5. Revisions
  6. Final decision
  7. Article is published
Submitted papers are evaluated by at least two anonymous referees for contribution, originality, relevance, and presentation (blind-peer review). The Editor shall inform you of the results of the review as soon as possible, hopefully in 30 to 60 days. Plagiarism detection of articles in this journal is carried out by using plagiarismcheckerx.com (Web Checker) and Mendeley as a Tool Reference Manager. The language used in this journal is English.