Student Teams Achievement Division: Hasil Belajar Siswa Materi Segi Empat

  • Lina Lestari SMP Negeri 1 Dullah, Tual, Indonesia
  • Magy Gaspersz Universitas Pattimura
  • Maritje Poppy Matulessy SMP Negeri 4 Ambon, Indonesia
Keywords: Learning outcomes, Cooperative learning, STAD

Abstract

Mathematics is one of the subjects considered difficult by students, so the learning outcomes obtained by students are low. The same thing also happened at SMPN 4 Ambon, after observing and interviewing the subject teachers, 58% of students obtained completeness of student learning in square material. Based on this, the teacher is required to be able to use the learning model so that the material is easily understood or understood by students and creates student-centered learning. So that it can improve student learning outcomes. This study aims to determine the increase in student learning outcomes in class VII-6 SMP Negeri 4 Ambon through the STAD type cooperative learning model with 28 research subjects consisting of 15 male students and 13 female students. Classroom Action Research (CAR) consists of 4 (four) stages, namely: Planning, Implementation, Observation, and Reflection. Data collection is done by observation and tests. The results of observation of the activity showed that there was an increase in each cycle. Likewise with learning outcomes in each cycle has increased namely in the first cycle student learning outcomes by 71.4% or 20 students increased to 89.3% or 25 students in the second cycle so an increase of 17.9%.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bergin, C., & Bergin, D. (2009). Attachment in the Classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 21(2), 141–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-009-9104-0
Gencosman, T., & Doǧru, M. (2012). Effect of student teams-achievement divisions technique used in science and technology education on self-efficacy, test anxiety and academic achievement. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 11(1), 43–54.
Kordaki, M., Daradoumis, T., Fragidakis, D., & Grigoriadou, M. (2012). Adapting the collaborative strategy “students team achievement divisions” in an information technology work place. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 408, 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28586-8_6
Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389
McMaster, K. N., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Effects of Cooperative Learning on the Academic Achievement of Students with Learning Disabilities: An Update of Tateyama-Sniezek’s Review. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 17(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00037
Ratumanan, G. T. (2016). Motivasi siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika. Di sampaikan dalam seminar nasional pendidikan matematika 2016 pengembangan penelitian pendidikan matematika untuk mendukung peningkatan kualitas pembelajaran matematika [Student motivation in learning mathematics. Delivered in the 2016 national mathematics education seminar development of mathematics education research to support the improvement of the quality of mathematics learning]. Hal 6-13.
Sofroniou, A., & Poutos, K. (2016). Investigating the Effectiveness of Group Work in Mathematics. Education Sciences, 6(4), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci6030030
Sternberg, R. J. (2015). Successful intelligence: A model for testing intelligence beyond IQ tests. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 8(2), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejeps.2015.09.004
Tarim, K., & Akdeniz, F. (2008). The effects of cooperative learning on Turkish elementary students’ mathematics achievement and attitude towards mathematics using TAI and STAD methods. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9088-y
Tiantong, M., & Teemuangsai, S. (2013). Student team achievement divisions (STAD) technique through the moodle to enhance learning achievement. International Education Studies, 6(4), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n4p85
Wang, K. P. (2012). The impact of nursing students’ chemistry learning performance assessment in Taiwan: Competitive versus non-competitive student team achievement division approaches. Research in Science and Technological Education, 30(2), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2012.687717
Published
2021-02-08
How to Cite
LestariL., GasperszM., & MatulessyM. (2021). Student Teams Achievement Division: Hasil Belajar Siswa Materi Segi Empat. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN PROFESI GURU INDONESIA (JPPGI), 1(1), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.30598/jppgivol1issue1page43-52
Section
Articles