Parate Eksekusi Oleh Kreditur Kepada Debitur Atas Objek Jaminan Kredit Akibat Wanprestasi

  • Werner Marfendo Apituley Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
  • Ronald Saija Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon, Indonesia
Keywords: Parate Execution, Creditor, Object of Credit Collateral, Default

Abstract

The implementation of the execution parate is regulated in Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights over land and objects related to the regulation of the execution model. In June 2023, the debtor borrowed credit from the creditor, namely BRI Rawamangun. For two years the debtor pays the credit smoothly, then in the third year the debtor is unable to pay off the credit. When providing credit, banks require collateral or collateral that can be used as a substitute for debt repayment if the debtor defaults. This research is normative legal research. The research approach uses a statutory approach, a case approach and a conceptual approach. The research stage uses library research, namely searching for secondary data using primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The legal material analysis technique uses qualitative analysis techniques. The results of the research show that, in setting the execution parate by the Bank for credit collateral objects due to default, the legal basis for the regulation of credit is Banking Law No. 10 of 1998 concerning credit agreements and Law No. 4 of 1996 concerning mortgage rights in article 6 related to the legal basis of the execution parate. This legal basis is the bank's power to carry out execution of credit guarantees due to default in good faith from the debtor who deliberately neglected to carry out the credit agreement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adjie, Habib. Hak Tanggungan Sebagai Lembaga Jaminan Atas Tanah. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2018.

Bahsan, M. Hukum Jaminan Dan Jaminan Kredit Perbankan Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2007.

Halina, Yolanda Violette, and dkk. “Penyelesaian Kredit Macet Bank Melalui Parate Eksekusi Berdasarkan Pasal 6 UU No 4 Tahun 1996.” Jurnal Lex Jurnalica 12, no. 1 (n.d.): 2.

Harun, Badriyah. Penyelesaian Sengketa Kredit Bermasalah. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Yudisia, 2010.

Hermansyah. Hukum Perbankan Nasional Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2005.

Isnaeni, Moch. Pengantar Hukum Jaminan Kebendaan. Laksbang Pressindo, 2017.

Muljadi, Kartini, and Gunawan Widjaja. Seri Hukum Harta Kekayaan: Hak Istimewa, Gadai, Dan Hipotek. Jakarta: Kencana, 2007.

Satrio, J. “Janji-Janji (Bedingeng) Dalam Akta Hipotek Dan Hak Tanggungan.” Media Notariat, n.d., 12.

Simaremare, Erwin, Merry Tjoanda, and Ronald Saija. “Penerapan Kelangsungan Usaha Bagi Debitur Pailit Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.” Jurnal Tatohi: Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 2 (n.d.): 132.

Sitania, Aryantho Dwiputra, Theresia Louize Pesulima, and Marselo Valentino Geovani Pariela. “Jaminan Sertifikat Hak Milik Atas Tanah Bukan Oleh Pemegang Hak Milik Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Perbankan.” Jurnal Tatohi 1, no. 6 (2021): 578.

Soewanti, I Made. Balai Lelang Dalam Penjualan Jaminan Kredit Macet. Yayasan Gloria, 2010.

Subekti. Aspek-Aspek Hukum Perikatan Nasional. Bandung: Alumni, 1986.

———. Hukum Perjanjian. Jakarta: PT Intermasa, 2005.

Subekti, R. Hukum Perjanjian. 4th ed. Jakarta: Intermasa, 1979.

Supramono, Gatot. Perbankan Dan Masalah Kredit: Suatu Tinjauan Di Bidang Yuridis. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2014.

Untung, H Budi. Kredit Perbankan Di Indonesia. 2nd ed. Yogyakarta: Andi, 2012.

Published
2025-06-30
How to Cite
Apituley, W. M., & Saija, R. (2025). Parate Eksekusi Oleh Kreditur Kepada Debitur Atas Objek Jaminan Kredit Akibat Wanprestasi. KANJOLI Business Law Review, 3(1), 46-53. https://doi.org/10.47268/kanjoli.v3i1.22703

Most read articles by the same author(s)