Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Pasif
Abstract
Introduction: Article 5 paragraph (1) of Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning the Prevention and Eradication of the Crime of Money Laundering. In this article, the maximum penalty is 5 years and a maximum fine of Rp. 1,000,000,000 (one billion rupiah). However, in the case of Faradibah Jusuf and his colleagues, one of the defendants on behalf of Soraya Pelu committed the crime of passive money laundering but was sentenced to 15 years in prison and a fine of five hundred million rupiah. This criminal provision exceeds the maximum criminal provisions in Article 5 paragraph (1). In addition, in this case there are 2 other suspected perpetrators, namely the initials DN and AMT, the closest people to the perpetrator Faradiba Yusuf, who is suspected of committing a passive money laundering crime, not being prosecuted and sentenced according to Article 5 paragraph (1) of Law Number 8 of 2010 concerning Prevention and Eradication of the Crime of Money Laundering.
Purposes of the Research: This study aims to examine: Criminal liability against perpetrators of passive money laundering and the system of evidence for passive money laundering.
Methods of the Research: The type of research used is normative, which is focused on providing explanations that explain a particular category. Approach the problem of the statute approach (statute approach) and the conceptual approach (conceptual approach). The collection of legal materials through primary legal materials is then free from secondary legal materials. The processing and analysis of legal materials is described in a qualitative way with the aim of describing the findings in the field.
Results of the Research: Criminal responsibility for the crime of money laundering can be imposed on criminals who receive funds or assets from the criminal subject to which criminal liability is required. There is a dissenting opinion from Judge Member 1 on Decision Number 5/Pid.Sud-TPK/2020/PN Amb, which basically explains that Judge Member 1 differs in opinion because according to Judge Member 1, the punishment for each of them must refer to the guidelines that have been set, issued by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia as contained in Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) Number 1 of 2020 dated 27 July 2020. This difference of opinion concerns the roles of each which are not the same as each other, causing unequal punishment.
Downloads
References
Elias Zadrack Leasa, (2021), Pengembalian Kerugian Nasabah Akibat Penggelapan Pihak Bank Dengan Penjatuhan Pidana, Jurnal Belo, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura Ambon.
Adami Chazawi, (2007), Pelajaran Hukum Pidana (Stelsel Pidana, Tindak Pidana, Teori –teori Pemidanaan dan Batas Berlakunya Hukum Pidana), Jakarta, PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Agus Rusianto, (2016), Tindak Pidana dan Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana, Jakarta, Prenadamedia Group.
Andi Zainal Abidin, (2007), Hukum Pidana I, cetakan ke-2, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika.
Chairul Huda, (2006), Dari Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan Menuju Kepada TiadaPertanggungjawaban Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan, Jakarta, Kencana.
Frans Maramis, (2013), Hukum Pidana Umum Dan Tertulis Di Indonesia, Jakarta, Rajawali Pers.
Lamintang, (2011), Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Jakarta, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
M.Abdul Kholiq dalam Mahrus Ali, (2012), Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika.
Moeljalento, (2008), Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Edisi revisi, Jakarta, Renika Cipta.
Molejatno dalam Mahrus Ali, (2012), Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana, Jakarta Sinar Grafika.
Roeslan Saleh dalam Hanafi Amrani dan Mahrus Ali, (2015), Sistem Pertanggungjawaban pidana Perkembangan dan Penerapan, Jakarta, PT Rajawali Press.
Schaffmeister, Keijzer, Sutorius, (1995), Hukum Pidana, Cetakan Pertama, Yogyakarta, Liberty.
Sudarto dalam Hanafi Amrani dan Mahrus Ali, (2015), Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Perkembangan dan Penerapan, Jakarta, Rajawali Pers.
Copyright (c) 2023 Abdussalam Ramdani Talaohu, Margie Gladies Sopacua, Elias Zadrach Leasa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright:
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
Licence : This Journal is disseminated based on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license terms. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivatives of this material for any purpose. You cannot use this material for commercial purposes. You must specify an appropriate name, include a link to the license, and certify that any changes have been made. You can do this in a way that is appropriate, but does not imply that the licensor supports you or your use.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License..
