Legal Aspects of International Cooperation Between Countries on Terrorism Criminal Action: Human Rights Perspective

  • Juanrico Alfaromona Sumarezs Titahelu Universitas Pattimura
Keywords: International Cooperation, Country, Counter-terrorism, Crime

Abstract

Terrorism has become a worldwide concern since the events of September 11, 2001, in the United States, in addition to the Bali bombings in Indonesia in 2002 and the bombings at Davao City airport in 2003. The broad impact of terrorism has caused Indonesia and the regional countries of Southeast Asia to feel very interested in actively participating in solving this problem. Forums for discussion and cooperation in the fight against terrorism have also arisen in the Southeast Asian region, such as the ASEAN Ministerial Meeting on Transnational Crime (AMMTC), which is a meeting forum within ASEAN to discuss issues of transnational crime. The purpose of this document is to examine and discuss the legal aspects of international cooperation in efforts to combat criminal acts of terrorism. The method that the researcher uses is a normative method, which uses a statutory approach, a case approach, and a conceptual approach. The technique of collecting legal materials used is by reviewing, identifying, and classifying primary and secondary legal materials based on library research. Then, the researcher describes qualitative description. Terrorism is all forms of actions and attitudes that are directly implemented against a country with the aim of creating terror against certain persons, groups, individuals, or the wider community. International cooperation between countries in order to maintain security against counter-terrorism crimes in ASEAN is necessary for achieving dynamic peace and stability while still prioritizing Indonesia's national interests which will also support the creation of an ASEAN Community in 2015 which consists of three mutually supportive principles, including the political-security community, the economic community, and the social and cultural community. The legal aspects of international cooperation between countries in efforts to combat terrorism include preventive, preventive, and repressive measures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

(a) Journal

[1] Afzal, S., Iqbal, H., & Inayay, M. (2012). Terrorism And Extremism As A Non-Traditional Security Threat Post 9/11: Implications For Pakistan’s Security. International Journal Of Business And Social Science, 3(24), 194–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30845/ijbss

[2] Agustin, E. R., & Winarwati, I. (2019). Pengaturan Lembaga Negara Dalam Menangani Kasus Teroris Dalam Tindak Pidana Terorisme Di Indonesia. Simposium Hukum Indonesia.

[3] Ashgar, A. (2015). Islam, Politik dan Radikalisme” : Tafsir Baru Kekerasan Aktivisme Islam di Indonesia. Keamanan Nasional, 1(2), 197–224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31599/jkn.v1i2.23

[4] Ayoob, M. (2002). Humanitarian Intervention and State Sovereignty. International Journal of Human Rights, 6(1), 81–102. DOI: https://doi.org/61jhr06x.qxd

[5] Darma, N. B., Wahyuningsih, S. E., & Hanim, L. (2018). Kebijakan Formulasi Hukum Pidana Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Terorisme Di Indonesia. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 1(1), 305–316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v1i1.2649

[6] Fani, R. (2020). Doktrin Pertanggungjawaban Komando Atas Kejahatan Berat HAM Menurut Hukum Pidana Internasional. Wacana Paramarta Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 19(1), 47–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32816/paramarta.v19i1.84

[7] Haryono, E. (2010). Kebijakan Anti-Terorisme Indonesia: Dilema Demokrasi dan Represi. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 14(2), 229–246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.10938

[8] Hidayat, S. (2014). Diplomasi Pertahanan Indonesia: Amalgam Militer-Sipil Indonesia Defense Diplomacy : Civil-Military Amalgams. Jurnal Pertahanan Dan Bela Negara, 4(2), 25–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33172/jpbh.v4i2.330

[9] Kedang, A. Y. (2017). Internasionalisasi dan Internalisasi Wacana War on Terror. Jurnal Sospol, 3(2), 21–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/sospol.v3i2.4883

[10] Kurniawati, D. E. (2012). Pendekatan Intermestik dalam Proses Perubahan Kebijakan: Sebuah Review Metodologis. Jurnal Studi Hubungan Internasional, 2(1), 154–167.

[11] Kusumah, M. W. (2002). Terorisme dalam Perspektif Politik dan Hukum. Jurnal Kriminologi Indonesia, 2(3), 22–29.

[12] Mukhtar, S. (2016). Strategi Pemerintah Indonesia Menghadapi Terorisme Dalam Era Demokratisasi. Reformasi (Jurnal Ilmia Sosial Ilmu Dan Ilmu Politik), 6(2), 143–153. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33366/rfr.v6i2.691

[13] Namora, G. A., Windiani, R., & Paramatsatya, S. (2016). Peran ASEAN Convention On Counter Terrorism dalam Penanganan Terorisme di Filipina Periode 2011-2013. Journal of International Relations Universitas Diponegoro, 2(4), 170–179.

[14] Pradityo, R. (2016). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Upaya Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Terorisme. Jurnal Rechtsvinding, 5(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v5i1.2

[15] Rachmayanthy. (2016). Tindak Pidana Terorisme Dari Perspektif Hukum Pidana Internasional. Jurnal Surya Kencana Dua: Dinamika Masalah Hukum Dan Keadilan, 3(1), 76–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32493/SKD.v3i1.y2016.116

[16] Ridwan. (2010). Upaya Penanggulangan Kejahatan Terorisme Yang Berkarakteristik Hak Asasi Manusia Di Indonesia. Jurnal Media Hukum, 17(1), 177–189. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.v17i1.376

[17] Sembiring, J., Marlina, & Akhyar, A. (2022). Tinjauan Yuridis Perbuatan Percobaan Untuk Melakukan Tindak Pidana Terorisme Menurut Undang Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2018 (Analisis Putusan Nomor 13/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Jkt.Tim. Jurnal Hukum Kaidah, 21(2), 248–278. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30743/jhk.v21i2.4793

[18] Seniwati, Azizuddin, M., Sani, M., & Nadaraja, K. (2012). Cooperation Between Indonesia and ASEAN to Counter Terrorism in Indonesia. Academic Research International, 2(1), 678–685.

[19] Setiawati, D. D., Effendi, E., & Edorita, W. (2015). Peran ASEAN dalam Memberantas Tindak Pidana Terorisme di Kawasan Asia Tenggara Berdasarkan Convention On Counter Terorism. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Bidang Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau, 2(1), 1–11.

[20] Tamat, S. (2017). Terorisme dan Deradikalisasi : Pengantar Memahami Fundamentalisme Islam dan Strategi Pencegahan Aksi Terorisme. Jurnal Keamanan Nasional, 3(2), 271–293.DOI: https://doi.org/10.31599/jkn.v3i2.57

[21] Titahelu, J. A. S. (2019a). Pelaksanaan Pembuktian Dalam Tindak Pidana Terorisme. Belo, 4(2), 145–157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30598/belovol4issue2page145-157

[22] Titahelu, J. A. S. (2019b). The Essence of Human Rights Violations in Social Conflict in Maluku (After The Riots In 1999). Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 9(8), 33–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7176/IKM

[23] Tumanggor, R. E. (2007). Indonesia’s Counter Terrorism Policy. UNISCI.

[24] Wibowo, J. E. (2021). Analisa Yuridis Upaya Penanggulangan Terorisme Sebagai Kejahatan Luar Biasa. Jurnal Education and Development Institut Pendidikan Tapanuli Selatan, 9(2), 12–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37081/ed.v9i2.2432

[25] Windiani, R. (2017). Peran Indonesia Dalam Memerangi Terorisme. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 16(2), 135–152.DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jis.16.2.2017.135-152

[26] Zaidan, M. A. (2017). Pemberantasan tindak pidana terorisme (Pendekatan Kebijakan Kriminal). Law Research Review Quarterly, 3(2), 149–180. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/snh.v3i1.20932

[27] Zulfi, M. (2012). Fenomena Terorisme di Indonesia, Kajian Aspek Teologi, Ideologi dan Gerakan. Jurnal Studi Masyarakat Islam, 15(2), 240–254.

(b) Book

[28] Burgess, Peter J. Non-Military Security Challenges dalam Synder, Craig A. 2008. Contemporary Security and Strategy 2nd Edition, New York: Palgrave Macmillan,
Published
2022-04-20
How to Cite
Titahelu, J. (2022). Legal Aspects of International Cooperation Between Countries on Terrorism Criminal Action: Human Rights Perspective. JURNAL BELO, 8(1), 67-84. https://doi.org/10.30598/belovol8issue1page67-84