Implementation of Karawang City Government Communication to the Community Regarding the Tangkar Application

  • Qinthara Malta Nariswari Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang
  • Teza Yudha Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang
  • Rachmat Ramdani Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang
Keywords: Community, Bureaucracy, Local Government, Politics

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of communication by the Karawang City Government in utilizing the TANGKAR application as an e-government–based public complaint system. The research employs a qualitative approach using in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation involving ten informants, consisting of officials from the Department of Communication and Informatics (Diskominfo), sub-district and village administrators, and members of the public who use the application. The findings indicate that government communication in the socialization and management of the TANGKAR application has been conducted through various digital channels; however, it still faces challenges related to message consistency, public digital literacy, and inter-agency responsiveness. The novelty of this study lies in positioning strategic communication as the primary variable in analyzing the effectiveness of a digital public complaint system, rather than focusing solely on the technical or policy aspects of e-government implementation. Therefore, this study provides a conceptual contribution by expanding the discourse on local-level e-government through a strategic communication perspective, while also offering empirical recommendations to strengthen public participation and improve the quality of digital-based public services.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdulkareem, A. K., Abdulkareem, Z. J., Ishola, A. A., & Akindele, I. T. (2022). Does e-government impact e-participation? The influence of trust in e-government. International Review of Public Administration, 27(2), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2022.2071540

Abulhaija, S., F Arroyabe, M. F., Kwong, C., & Zeng, W. (2026). Exploring the impact of external rewards on e-government services adoption: empirical evidence from Jordan. Public Management Review, 28(1), 180–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2025.2461685

Acharya, B. B., Paré, D. J., & Gajurel, D. (2025). Rethinking Digital Inequalities: a Quantitative Study on E-Government Use by Nepali Immigrants in Canada. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 26(3), 1987–2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-025-01261-1

Afifi, S., Bakti, I. G. M. Y., Yaman, A., & Sumaedi, S. (2025). A behavioural intention model of stunting information-seeking behaviour on social media. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-08-2024-0494

Alcaide-Muñoz, L., Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P., & Villamayor Arellano, C. L. (2025). Understanding different levels of e-participation in Spanish municipalities based on city and citizen profiles. Online Information Review, 49(8), 99–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-04-2025-0241

AlHussainan, O. N., AlFayyadh, M. A., Al-Sabe, A., & Al-Kandari, A. M. (2022). The Factors of E-Government Service Quality in Kuwait During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.311417

Alsaad, A. (2022). E-government and corruption control: The mediating effect of law enforcement. Electronic Government, 18(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2022.119619

Amirova, A., Salmanova, R., & Ismailova, R. (2026). Collaborative e-governance: ecosystem and citizen-centric approach (the case of Kazakhstani capital city). Electronic Government, 22(1), 74–96. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2026.150198

Atobishi, T., & Mansur, H. (2025). Bridging Digital Divides: Validating Government ICT Investments Accelerating Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17052191

Barbosa, J. D. S., & Mota, F. P. B. (2022). Adoption of e-government: a study on the role of trust. Revista de Administracao Publica, 56(4), 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220220027x

Chohan, S. R., & Hu, G. (2022). Strengthening digital inclusion through e-government: cohesive ICT training programs to intensify digital competency. Information Technology for Development, 28(1), 16–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2020.1841713

Choi, S. I., Kim, S., Jin, Y., Valentini, C., Badham, M., Colleoni, E., & Romenti, S. (2024). Effects of Individuals’ Cultural Orientations and Trust in Government Health Communication Sources on Behavioral Intentions During a Pandemic: A Cross-Country Study. Health Communication, 39(1), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2159975

Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., Santis, S., & Bisogno, M. (2022). Public-sector Financial Management and E-government: The Role Played by Accounting Systems. International Journal of Public Administration, 45(8), 605–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1868506

DANOWSKI, J. A. (2025). E-government and ideological polarization: A cross-national study of political communication. Technology in Society, 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102998

DePaula, N., & Hansson, S. (2025). Politicization of Government Social Media Communication: A Linguistic Framework and Case Study. Social Media and Society, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251333486

El-Gama, S., Abd El Aziz, R., & Abouelseoud, M. F. (2022). E-Government Service Quality: The Moderating Role of Awareness and the Mediating Role of Consistency. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.288072

Heriyanto, F., Stiawan, D., Samsuryadi, S., Palupi Rini, D. P., & Shakkah, M. S. (2025). Integrating E-Government Architecture with Sustainable Tourism Indicators for SDG Monitoring: Evidence from South Sumatra, Indonesia. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 20(10), 4529–4539. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.201038

Hummell, E., Borg, S. J., Foster, M., Burns, K., & Harris Rimmer, S. H. (2024). Agendas of Reform: Continuity and Change in Australia’s National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS). Social Policy and Society. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746424000101

Jeilani, A., Ahmed, S. A., & Arabow, A. (2025). Understanding e-government adoption among government employees: the mediating role of perceived attitude across key predictors. Discover Sustainability, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01592-0

Jeong, J.-S., & Kim, S. Y. (2024). Risk Perception and Preventive Behavior During the COVID-19 Pandemic : Testing the Effects of Government Trust and Information Behaviors. Health Communication, 39(2), 376–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2023.2166698

Johnson, N. L. (2023). Towards Understanding Disparities in Using Technology to Access Health Care Information: African American Veterans’ Sociocultural Perspectives on Using My HealtheVet for Diabetes Management. Health Communication, 38(11), 2399–2407. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2071392

Judge-Ellis, T., Abendroth, K., & Weber, J. (2025). Social Worker and Nurse Practitioner Consultation: An Innovative Approach to Bridging Healthcare Service and Communication Gaps for Veterans Experiencing Homelessness. Health and Social Work, 50(4), 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/hlaf031

Lin, Z. (2024). A Virtual Battlefield for Embassies: Longitudinal Network Analysis of Competing Mediated Public Diplomacy on Social Media. Political Communication, 41(5), 808–836. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2024.2312865

Linhartova, V. (2022). The Role of E-Government in the Evaluation of the Quality of Governance in the Countries of the European Union. Croatian and Comparative Public Administration, 22(2), 267–287. https://doi.org/10.31297/hkju.22.2.4

Lu, X., Zhang, X., Lange, E., Zheng, S., & Yang, Z. (2026). What makes e-participation in urban governance effective? Evidence from the government online message board in China, 2011–2021. Cities, 170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.106627

Matamoros-Fernández, A., Rodriguez, A., & Wikstrom, P. (2022). Humor That Harms? Examining Racist Audio‐Visual Memetic Media on TikTok During Covid‐19. Media and Communication, 10(2), 180–191. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i2.5154

Mavriki, P., & Karyda, M. (2022). Big data analytics in e-government and e-democracy applications: privacy threats, implications and mitigation. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 14(1–2), 58–82. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2022.123251

Monteiro, S., Ribeiro, V., & Gomes, P. (2024). Determinants of the Sustainable Development Goals Disclosure on Websites of Portuguese Municipalities. Revista Portuguesa de Estudos Regionais, 69, 7–23. https://doi.org/10.59072/rper.vi69.621

Moon, S. A., & Shin, E. J. (2025). Spatial patterns, implementation barriers, and facilitators in Seoul’s E-scooter parking corral system: A mixed-methods analysis. Transport Policy, 173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103813

Mora, C., Nelvo, R., & Monteiro, S. (2022). Government communication pieces on HIV pre-exposure (PrEP) and post-exposure (PEP) prophylaxis (2016-2019): analysis of their content and circulation among gay men, trans women/travestis, and sex workers. Saude e Sociedade, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902022210855en

Oliychenko, I., & Ditkovska, M. (2022). Formation and development of e-government in Ukraine: synergistic approach. Electronic Government, 18(2), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2022.121861

Owusu, A., Akpe-Doe, C. E., & Taana, I. H. (2022). Assessing the effectiveness of e-government services in Ghana: A case of the registrar general’s department. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 18(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.289827

Pratomo, R. A., Purwanto, M. Q., Ariansyah, M., Firdaus, R., Sandi, V. A. F., Rudiarto, I., Sari, O. L., Dewanti, A. N., & Budiman, P. W. (2025). Capturing Rural–Urban Region (RUR) Assessment through Integrated Conceptual and Geo–Big Data Approaches: A Case Study from Penajam Paser Utara, Neighboring Indonesia’s New Capital (IKN). International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 13(4), 173–207. https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.13.4_173

Qatawneh, N. (2024). Building a framework to drive government systems’ adoption of cloud computing through IT knowledge. Discover Sustainability, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00427-8

Quintana, A. G., Urquía-Grande, E., & Delgado Jalón, M. L. (2022). Strategic Conceptual Theories and Sustainable Cooperation Among Stakeholders in E-government, E-participation, and Social Media. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 16(2), 46–63. https://doi.org/10.2478/cejpp-2022-0007

Rahmatullah, R., Habibi, A., Khaeruddin, K., Yaqin, L. N., Alharmali, T. M., Fauzee, M. S. O., & Mahat, J. (2025). A study of user satisfaction and net benefits in indonesia through the DeLone and McLean Model for E-Government success. Discover Sustainability, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01645-4

Ray, A., Weaver, I. R., Agbozo, G. E., & Kong, Y. (2024). Mapping Interaction Design in Global Health Interventions: A Comparative Analysis of COVID-19 mHealth Technologies. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 67(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2024.3380408

Rehman, S. U., Qatawneh, N., Al-Okaily, A., Al-Okaily, M., Shiyyab, F. S., Alsharairi, M., Masa’deh, R., & Bani Mohmmad, A. (2024). The utility of smart government services apps solutions in the post-pandemic era. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-03-2024-0185

Reissig, L., Stoinescu, A., & Mack, G. (2022). Why farmers perceive the use of e-government services as an administrative burden: A conceptual framework on influencing factors. Journal of Rural Studies, 89, 387–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.01.002

Ren, Y. (2025). Entrepreneurial local-state driven rural e-commerce development: Evidence from less-developed rural West China. Cities, 166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.106188

Riani, E. (2021). Implementasi Kebijakan Program Tanggap Karawang Oleh Dinas Komunikasi Dan Informatika Kabupaten Karawang: Array. Moderat: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, 7(3), 414–428.

Rusmini, R., Alamsah Deliarnoor, N., Yuningsih, N. Y., & Sagita, N. I. (2025). Rethinking e-government failure: a readiness-based assessment of Indonesia’s digitalization efforts. Cogent Social Sciences, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2559867

Samudra, A. A. (2025). INTEGRATION OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND GOVERNANCE THEORY TO COMBAT CORRUPTION IN INDONESIA. Public Administration Issues, 2025(6), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2025-0-6-117-140

Savchuk, G. A., Bannykh, G. A., & Kulpin, S. V. (2025). Digital Communication of Young People With State Authorities: Sociocultural and Country-Specific Aspects. Changing Societies and Personalities, 9(4), 937–960. https://doi.org/10.15826/csp.2025.9.4.360

Schaebs, D. S. (2022). Contemporary e-government for smart tax authorities. Electronic Government, 18(4), 453–467. https://doi.org/10.1504/eg.2022.125919

Serafini, L., Gottlob, A., Pierri, F., Ieva, F., & Ceri, S. (2023). Risk Narratives on Immigration During the COVID-19 Crisis in Italy: A Comparative Analysis of Facebook Posts Published by Politicians and by News media. Journal of Communication Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1177/01968599231167939

Setiyani, L. (2021). Analysis of Acceptance of Karawang Responsible Service Application (Tangkar) Using Technology Acceptance Models 3 (TAM 3). Proceeding The First International Conference on Government Education Management and Tourism, 1(1), 485–494.

Shammut, M., & Imran, M. (2025). Automated and disrupted mobilities: Insights from the New Zealand industry sector. Cities, 165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.106098

Sugiarto, E., Mulyasna, D., & Sarihati, T. (2025). IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN E-GOVERNMENT DALAM PENINGKATAN MUTU PELAYANAN PUBLIK DI KABUPATEN KARAWANG. Jurnal Tata Kelola Dan Kebijakan Publik, 1(5), 692–701.

Sulaiman, D. F., & Erowati, D. (2025). EVALUASI TERHADAP PELAYANAN PUBLIK BERBASIS E-GOVERNMENT (STUDI KASUS APLIKASI TANGGAP KARAWANG TAHUN 2023-2025). Journal of Politic and Government Studies, 15(1), 15–21.

Tacian, B., Cimbleris-Alkmim, A., Dos Oliveir, F. A. S., & Oliveira, D. (2022). Collaborative autoethnography in pandemic times: A therapeutic and decolonial teachinglearning experience. Interface: Communication, Health, Education, 26. https://doi.org/10.1590/interface.210140

Tanguay, L., Bissonnette, J.-F., Calmé, S., Koutouki, K., & Turgeon, K. (2025). Enhancing natural habitats conservation success on private lands by understanding and addressing deficiencies in social capital. Land Use Policy, 157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107687

Thela, B., Zlotnikova, I., Galani, M., & Sigwele, T. (2025). Development of a Service-Oriented Interoperability Framework: The Botswana E-Government System Case Study. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1145/3712706

Trček, D. (2022). E-Government 4.0: Managing APIs as Facilitators for Digital Transformation. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 11(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2022-0001

Tuanaya, W., Wance, M., Aslinda, A., Niswaty, R., Kasmawati, A., & Syahidah, U. (2025). Trend Transformation in Population Administration in Indonesia: A Bibliometric Analysis 2012-2024. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 20(5), 2245–2255. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.200539

Unkels, R., Mkumbo, E., Kapologwe, N. A., Manzi, F., Hanson, C., Alvesson, H. M., & Pembe, A. B. (2026). “Implementing a policy is something else”. Governance of a complex health management information system and its digitalization in Tanzania: A qualitative study. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health, 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100695

Vujković, P., Ravšelj, D., Umek, L., & Aristovnik, A. (2022). Bibliometric Analysis of Smart Public Governance Research: Smart City and Smart Government in Comparative Perspective. Social Sciences, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11070293

Wardani, R. Y., Tryatmoko, M. W., & Lim, S. (2025). The Effects of E-Government Elements on E-Political Participation Through Political Efficacy in Indonesia. Asian Politics and Policy, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.70041

Wen, Y., Wen, R., Khalid, S., & Mahmood, H. (2025). How E-governance mediates the debt-green energy nexus? Evidence from BRICS+ countries. Sustainable Futures, 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101248

Winata, H. M., & Attala, W. N. (2024). The Role Of The Tanggap Karawang Application (Tangkar) In Enhancing Public Satisfaction In Karawang Regency: A Pls-Sem Approach. Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 22(3), 215–228.

Wu, J. (2025). Synergy or conflict: Can E-government policy mixes drive environmental improvements? Evidence from China’s multi-pilot quasi-experiment. Telecommunications Policy, 49(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2025.103069

Yıldız, M., & Dede, D. (2025). The use and misuse of metaphors in e-government studies. Government Information Quarterly, 42(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.102067

Younus, M., Mutiarin, D., Nurmandi, A., & Manaf, H. (2025). Understanding smart citizen participation in decision making in Malaysia through integration of the UMEGA model for E governance. Discover Sustainability, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-02354-8

Yudarwati, G. A., Putranto, I. A., & Delmo, K. M. (2022). Examining the Indonesian government’s social media use for disaster risk communication. Asian Journal of Communication, 32(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2021.2007274

Zhou, T., Huang, Y., Avanasi, R., Brain, R. A., Prosperi, M., & Bian, J. (2025). Content hubs, information flows, and reactions for pesticide-related discussions on Twitter/X. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 21(3), 628–638. https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjaf032

Zook, S., Adjei-Bamfo, P., Monroe-White, T., & Bawole, J. N. (2026). e-Government Adoption in Ghana: Structural Conditions and Employee Affective Orientation. Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.70068

Published
2026-05-05
How to Cite
Nariswari, Q., Yudha, T., & Ramdani, R. (2026). Implementation of Karawang City Government Communication to the Community Regarding the Tangkar Application. Journal of Government Science Studies, 5(1), 149-162. https://doi.org/10.66254/jgssvol5issue1page149-162