Case Study
The Use of British Parliamentary Debate System and Critical Thinking
Abstract
This study is a case study research, it aims to find out how British Parliamentary debate system enhance critical thinking skills of the debaters from English Debate Club (EDC) of Pattimura University. This also leads to the extend identification and analysis of critical thinking level from EDC Debaters. The subjects are debaters from EDC who have been train educing British Parliamentary Debate System. The data was collected through In-depth interview, documents review, and audio visual materials. The result in dicates two major things that affected critical thinking from BP system, including case buildi and four teams mechanism encapsulated the effectto create platform for critical engagement in global issues to the extend analysis. As an annex, debaters can proceed to 5th level of critical thinking (Evaluation) which in dicate the 5th stages of critical thinking (Advance Thinker). Therefore, the mechanism of BP canal so be implemented in learning and teaching process, especially in critical thinking aspect.
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2020 Matai International Journal of Language Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who decide to share their articles with this journal must agree with these requisites:
1. The author, as the copyright owner, gives Matai the right to publish their work 2. Authors can share their articles, but they have to use Matai's published version by acknowledging Matai as the source. 3. Authors are encouraged to share their work online in order to let people know about their articles which can lead to more citations of the published work. |