Reformulation of Regulation on Prostitution Crime as Predicate Crime in Money Laundering

  • Ardi Purboyo Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia.
  • Slamet Suhartono Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia.
  • Yovita Arie Mangesti Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Keywords: Prostitution, Predicate Crime, Money Laundering

Abstract

Introduction: A person who carries out a financial transaction or other financial transaction that is suspected of hiding or disguising the origin of wealth from illegal acquisitions as if it were legitimate wealth and not the result of a crime, its truth must first be proven.

Purposes of the Research: Research aims to find the urgency of regulating the crime of money laundering originating from prostitution in the National Criminal Code based on the principle of justice and the concept of reformulating the regulation of the crime of money laundering originating from prostitution in the National Criminal Code.

Methods of the Research: A study uses normative legal research, namely legal research that focuses on the study, review, and analysis of positive law. This research is a review or analysis that focuses on the rules or provisions stipulated in applicable laws and regulations. A study was conducted on the primary legal materials and secondary legal materials used to answer the legal issues raised, namely related to the regulation of money laundering crimes originating from prostitution crimes.

Results Main Findings of the Research: The results of the study show the urgency of reformulating the regulation of prostitution as a predicate crime in money laundering as a crime of follow does not reflect the value of justice for the community involved in both crimes. The concept of reformulating the regulation of prostitution as a predicate crime as a predicate crime in money laundering as a crime of follow must be classified against the perpetrators involved in prostitution activities. as a predicate crime in money laundering as a crime of follow must first be distinguished regarding the parties involved, such as pimps/intermediaries, providers of commercial sexual service facilities, and also sex workers who are distinguished as professions and sex workers as victims of sexual exploitation. The community understands that prostitution is not just a symptom of social pathology but is a criminal act. The community should be involved in social control efforts so that there are no further criminal acts, namely money laundering.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almeida, Christine Sant’Anna de, Laura Stella Miccoli, Nisa Fitri Andhini, Solange Aranha, Luciana C. de Oliveira, Citar Este Artigo, Aprovado Autor Recebido Em, et al. Ragam Metode Penelitian Hukum. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada. 5, 2016.

Amalya, Adna Safira, and Rehnalemken Ginting. “Tinjauan Kritis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang Yang Dilakukan Pengelola Jasa Prostitusi.” Recidive : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan 9, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.20961/recidive.v9i1.47385.

Anindia, Islamia Ayu, and R B Sularto. “Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Upaya Penanggulangan Prostitusi Sebagai Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 1, no. 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v1i1.18-30.

Antari, Putu Eva Ditayani. “Pemidanaan Terhadap Pekerja Seks Komersial Melalui Aplikasi Michat The Liability of Prostitute On Michat.” Jurnal Selat 9, no. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.31629/selat.v9i2.4386.

Aulia, M. Zulfa. “Friedrich Carl von Savigny Tentang Hukum: Hukum Sebagai Manifestasi Jiwa Bangsa.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 3, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.3.1.201-236.

Black, Henry Campbell. “Black’s Law Dictionary Eighth Edition.” Nuevos Sistemas de Comunicación e Información, 2021.

Fafirani, Laila Nur, and Diana Lukitasari. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Mucikari Dan Pengguna Jasa Dalam Prostitusi Online Anak.” Recidive : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan 11, no. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.20961/recidive.v11i2.67450.

Fernandho, Dauglas. “Reformulasi Pembuktian Terbalik Dalam Memaksimalkan Pemeriksaan Perkara Money Laundering Dengan Predicate Crime Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Litigasi 19, no. 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v19i2.922.

Hamid, Abd. “Penegakan Hukum Pada Tingkat Penyidikan Dalam Tindak Pidana Penyedia Sarana Prostitusi Di Kepolisian Resor Pasaman Barat.” UNES Journal of Swara Justisia 6, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v6i1.242.

Hidayat, Arif. “Pandecta Penemuan Hukum Melalui Penafsiran Hakim Dalam Putusan Pengadilan.” Pandecta: Research Law Journal 8 (2013).

Ida Bagus Gede Subawa, and Made Krisna Dwipaya. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pekerja Seks Komersial Secara Online.” Jurnal Hukum Saraswati (JHS) 3, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.36733/jhshs.v3i1.1838.

Juita, Subaidah Ratna, Ani Triwati, and Agus Saiful Abib. “Reformulasi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pada Pelaku Prostitusi Online: Suatu Kajian Normatif.” Jurnal Dinamika Sosial Budaya 18, no. 1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.26623/jdsb.v18i1.565.

Kanya Zulkafia, Regina, and Dian Andriasari. “Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Praktik Prostitusi Di Kota Bandung Sebagai Penyakit Masyarakat Ditinjau Dari Aspek Hukum Pidana Dan Aspek Kriminologi.” Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies 3, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.29313/bcsls.v3i1.4991.

Kusumastuti, Novicca Dewi, and Heri Qomarudin. “Sanksi Pidana Prostitusi Siber Bagi Pelaku Dan Mucikari Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Publika 11, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.33603/publika.v11i1.8201.

Lukito, Anastasia Suhartati. “Financial Intelligent Investigations in Combating Money Laundering Crime: An Indonesian Legal Perspective.” Journal of Money Laundering Control 19, no. 1 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-09-2014-0029.

Mamulai, Muslim. “Hakikat Pembuktian Melalui Media Elektronik Dalam Prespektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia.” Al-Ishlah : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 20, no. 1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.33096/aijih.v19i1.2.

———. “Hakikat Pembuktian Melalui Media Elektronik Dalam Prespektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia.” Al-Ishlah : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 20, no. 1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.33096/aijih.v20i1.2.

Mangesti, Yovita Arie, and Slamet Suhartono. “Ilmu Hukum Kontemporer, Menembus Batas Kekakuan Hukum Normatif.” Malang: Setara Press, 2020.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. “Teori Hukum,” 2020.

Meiryani. “Exploration of Potential Money Laundering Crimes with Virtual Currency Facilities in Indonesia.” Journal of Money Laundering Control, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-01-2023-0010.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. “Legal Theory.” Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2012.

Muhamad Iqbal, Susanto, and Bhanu Prakash Nunna. “Sexual Gratification As A Serious Threat In Modern Criminal Reasoning On Aspects Of Judges’ Considerations In Court Judgment.” Jurnal Jurisprudence 13, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v13i2.1819.

Nani Widya Sari, Henny Nuraeny, Oksidelfa Yanto, Guntarto Widodo, and Bhanus Prakash Nunna. “Relationship Between Money Laundering Crime and Corruption Crime as Originate Crime From the Criminal Perspective.” International Journal of Integrative Sciences 2, no. 12 (2023). https://doi.org/10.55927/ijis.v2i12.6956.

Ningtias, Ayu Dian, and Suisno Suisno. “Konsep Hukum Pembuktian Prostitusi Melalui Media Sosial Dalam Aspek Hukum Pidana.” Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan 5, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.35308/jic.v5i1.2613.

Novianti*, Liza, and Waliadin Waliadin. “Online Prostitution in the Perspective of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 44 Of 2008 On Pornography.” Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities 6, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.24815/jr.v6i1.31457.

Nurdin, Boy, and Dwi Asmoro. “Imposition of Criminal Sanctions on Corporations and/or Corporate Control Personnel Who Commit Money Laundering Crimes.” Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains 5, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v5i1.938.

Pradipta, Mulia Agung. “Reformulasi Pidana Pengganti Denda Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Di Indonesia.” Pandecta: Research Law Journal 13, no. 2 (2018). https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v13i2.16623.

Pradipta, Mulia Agung, and Pujiyono Pujiyono. “Reformulasi Pidana Pengganti Denda Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 Tentang Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 1, no. 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v1i1.1-17.

Pratama, I Gede Yoga, Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi, and I Made Minggu Widyantara. “Kriminalisasi Terhadap Pekerja Seks Komersial Melalui Online Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Preferensi Hukum 2, no. 3 (2021). https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.2.3.4022.594-598.

Purnomo, Sareng, Bernat Panjaitan, and Nimrot Siahaan. “Juridical Review of Money Laundering Crimes Committed by the President Director of PT. Asabri.” Journal of Social Research 1, no. 12 (2022). https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v1i12.390.

Putera, Muhammad Arif Eka. “Analisis Yuridis Tentang Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Prostitusi Online.” Jurnal Hukum, no. 44 (2022).

Putri, Fany Annisa. “Penjatuhan Sanksi Pidana Oleh Hakim Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Praktik Mucikari.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC) 3, no. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.18196/ijclc.v3i2.15528.

Rahma, Ida. “Urgensi Peran Pusat Pelaporan Dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan Dalam Penegakkan Hukum Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang.” MAQASIDI: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, 2022. https://doi.org/10.47498/maqasidi.vi.1311.

Rizky, Defid Tri, and Mochamad Kevin Romadhona. “Prinsip Pembuktian Perkara Tindak Pidana Pencucian Yang Berdiri Sendiri (Stand Alone Money Laundering).” Media Iuris 5, no. 3 (2022). https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.v5i3.36098.

Rosyadha, Alfian Aulia, Bagus Wicaksono, Ocna Nusrilia, and Sinta Ana Pramita. “Penerapan Asas Serentak Tindak Pidana Narkotika Dan Pencucian Uang Di Pengadilan Tinggi Aceh.” Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum 3, no. 3 (2022): 533–38.

Rosyidah, Hanna, Bayu Satya Ndharma, and Naya Aulia Zulfa. “Inkonsistensi Aturan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pencucian Uang Oleh Korporasi: Perlukah Reformulasi?” Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 2, no. 12 (2021). https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v2i12.147.

Rusdianto, Andy Putra, and Otto Yudianto. “Urgensi Pengaturan Yang Mewajibkan Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Asal Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang.” Civilia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan 1, no. 2 (2022).

Safitri, Anisya Ines, Aldo Andrieyan Putra Makaminan, and Mujiono Hafidh Prasetyo. “Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Upaya Penanggulangan Cyber Prostitution.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 3, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v3i1.70-79.

Sembiring, Riky. “Keadilan Pancasila Dalam Persepektif Teori Keadilan Aristoteles.” Jurnal Aktual Justice 3, no. 2 (2018). https://doi.org/10.47329/aktualjustice.v3i2.539.

Shekhar, Beulah. “The Debt Trap, a Shadow Pandemic for Commercial Sex Workers: Vulnerability, Impact, and Action.” International Review of Victimology 29, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1177/02697580211035585.

Srivastava, Smiriti, Swaraj S. Pradhan, Bijaya Luitel, Pavithra Manghaipathy, and Marco Romero. “Analysis of Technology, Economic, and Legislation Readiness Levels of Asteroid Mining Industry: A Base for the Future Space Resource Utilization Missions.” New Space 11, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1089/space.2021.0025.

Suhartono, Slamet. “Vage Normen Sebagai Dasar Tindakan Hukum Tata Usaha Negara.” Disertasi Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, 2009.

Tan, David. “Metode Penelitian Hukum: Mengupas Dan Mengulas Metodologi Dalam Menyelenggarakan Penelitian Hukum.” Nusantara: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial 8, no. 2 (2021).

Taniady, Vicko, and Novi Wahyu Riwayanti. “Reformulasi Beban Pembuktian Terbalik Berlandaskan Asas Presumption of Guilt Terhadap Kasus TPPU Di Indonesia.” Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal 1, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.15294/ipmhi.v1i2.53702.

Wibowo, Muhtar Hadi. “Corporate Responsibility in Money Laundering Crime (Perspective Criminal Law Policy in Crime of Corruption in Indonesia).” Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 3, no. 2 (2018). https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v3i02.22740.

Wijaya Mahardika, I Komang, and I Gede Yusa. “Kriminalisasi Terhadap Perbuatan Penggunaan Jasa Prostitusi Di Indonesia.” Kertha Wicara : Journal Ilmu Hukum 9, no. 1 (2019).

Winiharti, Menik. “Analisis Diksi Pada Judul Berita Utama Surat Kabar Yang Memberitakan Rapat Pansus DPR RI Untuk Kasus Bank Century.” Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora 12, no. 1 (2011).

Wulandari, Puput Pratiwi. “Implikasi Pidana Tambahan Terhadap Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang.” JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan) 4, no. 4 (2020). https://doi.org/10.36312/jisip.v4i4.1420.

Yuherawan, Deni, and Subaidah Ratna Juita. “Aktualisasi Nilai-Nilai Pancasila Melalui Reformulasi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pada Kasus Prostitusi Online.” Rechtidee 15, no. 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.21107/ri.v15i2.9141.

Yulianti, Lulu, Ivan Zairani, and Rini Apriyani. “Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Mucikari Terkait Prostitusi Online Di Indonesia.” Risalah Hukum 15, no. 1 (2020).

Yusmar, Widiya, Somawijaya Somawijaya, and Nella Sumika Putri. “Urgensi Pengesahan Rancangan Undang-Undang Perampasan Aset Tindak Pidana Sebagai Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dengan Predicate Crime Tindak Pidana Narkotika.” Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi 9, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.25157/justisi.v9i2.5581.

Published
2025-08-31
How to Cite
Purboyo, Ardi, Slamet Suhartono, and Yovita Mangesti. 2025. “Reformulation of Regulation on Prostitution Crime As Predicate Crime in Money Laundering”. PATTIMURA Legal Journal 4 (2), 170-212. https://doi.org/10.47268/pela.v4i2.19161.