Criminal Law Politics and Punishment Theories: A Comparative Study of Retributive vs. Restorative Justice in Indonesia and Georgia

Nur Ainy Amira Puspitaning Suwandi; Lutfi Nur Aida; I Gede Widhiana Suarda; Y A Triana Ohoiwutun; Maia Kapanadze

doi:10.47268/pela.v4i3.21767

Nur Ainy Amira Puspitaning Suwandi Faculty of Law, Universitas Jember, Jember, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5061-2900
Lutfi Nur Aida Faculty of Law, Universitas Jember, Jember, Indonesia
I Gede Widhiana Suarda Faculty of Law, Universitas Jember, Jember, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8482-6966
Y A Triana Ohoiwutun Faculty of Law, Universitas Jember, Jember, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4368-3611
Maia Kapanadze Caucasus International University, Tbilisi, Georgia https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1426-4113

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/pela.v4i3.21767

Keywords: Criminal Law Policy, Retributive Justice, Restorative Justice

Abstract

Introduction: The debate between retributive and restorative justice remains a central issue in the politics of criminal law across jurisdictions. Indonesia and Georgia represent two countries undergoing legal transitions with distinct historical and socio-political contexts, yet both face similar challenges in determining the orientation of their penal policies.

Purposes of the Research: This study aims to analyze the differences in the application of retributive and restorative penal theories within the criminal law policies of Indonesia and Georgia, as well as to identify the factors influencing these orientations.

Methods of the Research: The research adopts a normative legal method with a comparative approach, examining statutory provisions, legal doctrines, and relevant judicial decisions.

Results Main Findings of the Research: The findings reveal that Indonesia continues to rely on its colonial legacy through the Criminal Code, which predominantly reflects a retributive paradigm, while gradually incorporating restorative principles in specific legislation such as the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law. Conversely, Georgia, which previously enforced an extreme zero tolerance policy rooted in a retributive approach, has shifted toward restorative justice within its juvenile justice system through the enactment of the Juvenile Justice Code of 2015. The novelty of this research lies in its comparative analysis, which uncovers how historical, cultural, political, socio-economic, and legal factors shape each country’s penal orientation. These findings contribute to the development of comparative criminal law scholarship and provide valuable insights for promoting more balanced penal policies that integrate both retributive and restorative justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anis, Mursal, Fitriati Fitriati, and Bisma Putra Pratama. “Analisis Putusan Hakim Dalam Penerapan Teori Retributif Dikaitkan Dengan Rasa Keadilan Bagi Korban Pada Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan.” Unes Journal of Swara Justisia 7, no. 2 (2023): 575–84. https://doi.org/10.31933/UJSJ.V7I2.347.

Asa, Agam Ibnu, Muhammad Mukhtasar Syamsuddin, Agus Wahyudi, and Agus Hamzah. “Aliran Filsafat Hukum Sebagai Cara Pandang (Worldview) Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Pidana.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 7, no. 2 (2025): 199–227. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v7i2.20-48.

Bahri, Syamsul. “Hukum Pidana Sebagai Instrumen Penegakan Keadilan Dan Upaya Meminimalisir Pelanggaran Hukum Dalam Masyarakat.” Ameena Journal 2, no. 4 (2024): 425–36. https://doi.org/10.63732/AIJ.V2I4.135.

Capera, Brilian. “Keadilan Restoratif Sebagai Paradigma Pemidanaan Di Indonesia.” Lex Renaissance 6, no. 2 (2021): 225–34. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.VOL6.ISS2.ART1.

D, Thriveni, and P. Madhava Soma Sundaram. “The Effectiveness of Restorative Justice Practices for Juvenile in Conflict with Law.” Rigeo 11, no. 11 (2021): 1–11. https://rigeo.org/menu-script/index.php/rigeo/article/view/2754.

Dewi, Sumartini, Dwinanda Lichia Levi Heningdyah Nikolas Kusumawardhani, Achmad Jaelani, Stelvia W. Noya, and Herry Pasrani Mendrofa. “Efektivitas Pemidanaan Penjara Dalam Mencegah Tindak Pidana Berulang Di Indonesia:” Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains 7, no. 12 (2024): 4568–73. https://doi.org/10.56338/JKS.V7I12.6567.

Elfin, Fadillah Heri, and Fahmiron. “Tanggung Jawab Hukum Pelaku Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Untuk Merehabilitasi Korban Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif.” Ekasakti Legal Science Journal 2, no. 1 (2025): 60–70. https://doi.org/10.60034/QB93M931.

Fauzi, Fikriyah Iftinan, Ira Kesuma Dewi, and Selamat Riadi. “Penguatan Mindset Kolektif Dalam Membangun Komunikasi Melalui Gotong Royong Berbasis Budaya Lokal Masyarakat Gantang Rani.” Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat IPTEK 5, no. 2 (2025): 227–34. https://doi.org/10.53513/abdi.v5i2.11782.

Flora, Henny Saida. “Restorative Justice Sebagai Pendekatan Efektif Untuk Perlindungan Korban : Mengutamakan Keadilan Dan Pemulihan.” Jurnal Hukum Justice 2, no. 2 (2025): 78–89. https://ejournal.ust.ac.id/index.php/JHJ/article/view/4643.

Guenther, Celine R., and Addison H. Morgan. “Penal Institutions - Criminal Procedure.” Georgia State University Law Review 41 (2024). https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/gslr41&id=93&div=&collection=.

Guruli, Papuna, and in Law. “Dark Legacy of Zero Tolerance in Georgia (Criminal Punishment and Sentencing).” Law and World 11, no. 34 (2025): 7–16. https://doi.org/10.36475/11.2.1.

Hakim, Allief Fitrah, Brahmantyo A Tabranie, Rafly Rafsanajni, and M. Reza A Bahtiarsyah. “Konsep Keadilan Retributif Dalam Penegakan Hukum :Tinjauan Dari Para Tokoh-Tokoh.” Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan, Seni, Sains Dan Sosial Humaniora 3, no. 01 (2025): 15. https://doi.org/10.11111/nusantara.xxxxxxx.

Heffernan, William C. “Sentencing: Surveying Current Practices.” In Social Justice/Criminal Justice, 87–101. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-75397-8_7.

Hikmah, Faidatul, and Rio Armanda Agustian. “Konvergensi Konsep Retribusi Dan Rehabilitasi Dalam Filsafat Hukum Pidana Kontemporer Indonesia.” CREPIDO 5, no. 2 (2023): 217–28. https://doi.org/10.14710/CREPIDO.5.2.217-228.

Iakobishvili, Giorgi. “EU-Georgia Relations and Democratization: An Analysis of Reforms and Challenges.” Georgian Journal for European Studies, no. 7 (2025): 124–39. https://gjes.tsu.ge/index.php/gjes/article/view/64.

Jaenudin, and Rasyida Rofi’atun Nisa. “Klasifikasi Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Dengan Sistem Restorative Justice.” Journal Scientific of Mandalika (JSM) e-ISSN 2745-5955 | p-ISSN 2809-0543 6, no. 3 (2025): 631–42. https://doi.org/10.36312/10.36312/VOL6ISS3PP631-642.

Khaerunessa, Shakira Ananda, Putri Khoerunnisa Damayanti, Bilqis Aprilianie, and Farrel Fadhil Pratama. “Legitimasi Hukuman Mati Menurut Immanuel Kant : Teori Keadilan Retributif Dan Konfliknya Dengan Hak Asasi Manusia.” Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum Dan Masyarakat 4, no. 01 (2025): 13. https://doi.org/10.11111/dassollen.xxxxxxx.

Knorre, Alex, Vladimir Kudryavtsev, Ekaterina Khodzhaeva, Kseniia Runova, and Kirill Titaev. “The Lull Before the Storm? Criminal Justice, Crime and Incarceration in Russia (2000–2020).” Europe-Asia Studies 76, no. 8 (2024): 1229–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2024.2374558.

Laksono, Alam Suryo, and B. Patmawanti. “Politik Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Berkarakter Pancasila.” Unes Journal of Swara Justisia 8, no. 4 (2025): 913–26. https://doi.org/10.31933/07495384.

Maulida, Gina. “Korelasi Hukum Adat Dan Restorative Justice: Membangun Keadilan Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Di Indonesia.” Pikukuh : Jurnal Hukum Dan Kearifan Lokal 2, no. 1 (2025): 20–28. https://doi.org/10.62870/PKH.V2I1.29382.

McPhillip, W. Sean, Andrew A. Palmer, and Oren Snir. “General Provisions.” Georgia State University Law Review 33 (2016). https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/gslr33&id=159&div=&collection=.

Mestiashvili, Mariam. “From Western Aspirations to Eastern Shadows: Analyzing Georgia’s Path from Perestroika to the Foreign Influence Law and Its Implications for EU Integration.” University of Padua, 2025. https://thesis.unipd.it/handle/20.500.12608/83940.

Mubarok, Nafi ’. “Sejarah Perkembangan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia: Menyongsong Kehadiran KUHP 2023 Dengan Memahami Dari Aspek Kesejarahan.” Al-Qanun: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam 27, no. 1 (2024): 15–31. https://doi.org/10.15642/alqanun.2024.27.1.15-31.

Muksin, Muchlas Rastra Samara. “Tujuan Pemidanaan Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia.” SAPIENTIA ET VIRTUS 8, no. 1 (2023): 225–47. https://doi.org/10.37477/SEV.V8I1.465.

Nasution, Muhammad Idris, Muhammad Ali, and Fauziah Lubis. “Pembaruan Sistem Pemidanaan Di Indonesia: Kajian Literatur Atas KUHP Baru.” Judge : Jurnal Hukum 5, no. 01 (2024): 16–23. https://doi.org/10.54209/judge.v5i02.xxx.

Noorman, Kaylee, Julie Brancale, and Thomas G. Blomberg. “Criminal Justice Policy Reform Through Researcher–Practitioner/Policymaker Partnerships.” In Handbook of Issues in Criminal Justice Reform in the United States, edited by Elizabeth Jeglic and Cynthia Calkins, 231–54. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77565-0_13.

Rainey, Thomas O. IV. “Protecting the Things That Cannot Protect Themselves: Why Georgia Must Extend Protection to Its Living Natural Assets.” John Marshall Law Journal 5 (2011). https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jmlwj5&id=189&div=&collection=.

Rani, Tabinda, Aamir Mushtaq Cheema, and Sabeela Gul. “From Socialism to Sovereignty: A Comparative Study of 1918 Constitution of Russian Socialist Federation Soviet Republic and 1993 Constitution of Russian Federation.” Annual Methodological Archive Research Review 3, no. 6 (2025): 26–45. https://doi.org/10.63075/X0FKCW66.

Ruslan, Muhammad Ibnu Maulana. “Keadilan Restoratif Bagi Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Siber Di Indonesia: Analisis Normatif Dan Perspektif Kriminologi.” Indonesian Journal of Intellectual Publication 5, no. 3 (2025): 232–45. https://doi.org/10.51577/ijipublication.v5i3.711.

Saputra, Ewaprilyandi Fahmi, and Hery Firmansyah. “Politik Hukum Dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Melalui Pembaharuan Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagai Extraordinary Crime Dalam KUHP Nasional.” UNES Law Review 6, no. 2 (2023): 4493–4504. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1284.

Sihombing, L. Alfies, and Yeni Nuraeni. “Efektifkah Restoratif Justice ? Suatu Kajian Upaya Optimalisasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia 9, no. 2 (2023): 273–304. https://doi.org/10.35194/JHMJ.V9I2.3952.

Situmeang, Sahat Maruli Tua, and Krusitha Meilan. “Evolusi Kejahatan Dan Pemidanaan: Tantangan Dalam Penegakan Hukum Dan Penologi Modern.” Res Nullius Law Journal 7, no. 2 (2025): 87–97. https://doi.org/10.34010/rnlj.v7i2.15913.

Slobogin, Christopher. “Preventive Justice: How Algorithms, Parole Boards, and Limiting Retributivism Could End Mass Incarceration.” Wake Forest Law Review 56 (2021). https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/wflr56&id=104&div=&collection=.

Ternando, Albi, M.s Alfarisi, and Rahman Rahman. “Implementasi Hukum Adat Sebagai Penanganan Restorative Justice Dalam Membangun Sistem Alternative Penyelesaian Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia.” Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum 15, no. 2 (2023): 204–12. https://doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v15i2.506.

Trikoz, Elena N. “Model of the Soviet Criminal Law Codification: Methodological, Legal and Technical Features.” RUDN Journal of Law 26, no. 4 (2022): 890–920. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2337-2022-26-4-890-920.

Trykhlib, Kristina. “The Implementation of the Rule-of-Law Principle in Post-Soviet States: Myth or Reality.” In Constitutional Traditions and Constitutional Transitions, 133–59. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2024. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035345410.00014.

W, Yuliana Yuli, Edward Benedictus Roring, Satino Satino, Citraresmi Widoretno Putri, and Kayus Kayowuan Lewoleba. “Dinamika Pemidanaan Di Era Modern: Antara Keadilan Restoratif Dan Retributif.” Ikra-Ith Humaniora : Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora 9, no. 2 (July 2, 2025): 281–89. https://doi.org/10.37817/ikraith-humaniora.v9i2.4417.