Challenges and Strategies in Prosecutorial Asset Tracing for Recovering State Losses from Corruption in Indonesia
Abstract
Introduction: Corruption constitutes an extraordinary crime that causes substantial and real losses to state finances in Indonesia. Despite existing legal mechanisms for substitute money payment execution as stipulated in Article 18 of the Anti-Corruption Law, recovering state losses from corruption remains a critical and persistent challenge. Prosecutors hold a central role in the asset recovery process, functioning not merely as administrative executors of court decisions but also as strategic actors responsible for tracking, seizing, and auctioning convict assets to recover state financial losses.
Purposes of the Research: This research investigates why prosecutors, as primary executors of court decisions under Article 18 of the Anti-Corruption Law, face persistent difficulties and obstacles in effective asset recovery.
Methods of the Research: Through normative juridical methodology that focuses on the study of positive legal norms, this research analyzes anti-corruption law, prosecutorial law, and state finance regulations.
Results Main Findings of the Research: This study identifies a fundamental gap in the existing legal framework: the lack of explicit and comprehensive legal authorization for follow the money and asset tracing approaches in prosecutorial asset recovery operations. The main findings reveal that the absence of clear legal norms governing these investigative methods significantly undermines the effectiveness of asset recovery from corruption crimes. Empirical obstacles include poor inter-institutional coordination, limited access to financial information and banking data, and absent cross-jurisdictional tracking frameworks that hinder comprehensive asset identification. These structural deficiencies reduce asset recovery efforts to reactive administrative processes rather than proactive strategic investigations. Therefore, the study recommends urgent legislative intervention to formally authorize and comprehensively regulate prosecutorial application of follow the money and asset tracing methods. This legal reform is expected to provide legal certainty, enhance prosecutorial accountability, and strengthen the overall effectiveness and integrity of corruption eradication efforts in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Arifin, Firdaus. “Problematika Hukum Pengembalian Aset Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pelaku Dan Ahli Warisnya.” Pagaruyuang Law Journal 3, no. 1 (2019): 64–85. https://doi.org/10.31869/plj.v3i1.1604.
Dasilva, Louis Hangri Aldiano, Rudepel Petrus Leo, and Darius Antonius Kian. “Upaya Jaksa Selaku Eksekutor Dalam Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Tata Negara 1, no. 4 (2023): 157–73. https://doi.org/10.55606/birokrasi.v1i4.733.
Hamzah, Andi. Korupsi Di Indonesia: Masalah Dan Pemecahannya. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2008.
Kholis, Efi Laila. Pembayaran Uang Pengganti Dalam Perkara Korupsi. Jakarta: Solusi Publishing, 2010.
Kusnadi. “Kebijakan Formulasi Ketentuan Pengembalian Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Corruptio 1, no. 2 (2020): 105–16. https://doi.org/10.25041/corruptio.v1i2.2097.
Mertha, I Ketut. Efek Jera Pemiskinan Koruptor Dan Sanksi Pidana. Denpasar: Udayana University Press, 2014.
Mulyati, Nani, and Aria Zurnetti. “Asset Recovery as a Fundamental Principal in Law Enforcement of Corruption by Corporations.” Andalas International Journal of Socio-Humanities 4, no. 1 (2022): 51–60. https://doi.org/10.25077/aijosh.v4i1.33.
Neloe, Edward Cornelis William. Pemberian Kredit Bank Menjadi Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta: Verbum Publishing, 2012.
Pardede, Rudi. Proses Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Akibat Korupsi. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2017.
Pramaisella, Novenda Amellia Sandra, Nurul Umi Ati, and Retno Wulan Sekarsari. “Implementasi Pembayaran Uang Pengganti Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Kasus Di Kantor Kejaksaan Negeri Batu).” Respon Publik 5, no. 2 (2021): 87–97.
Saidi, Muhammad Djafar, and Eka Merdekawati Djafar. Hukum Keuangan Negara: Teori Dan Praktik. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2021.
Soekanto, Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI- Press, 2014.
Widhiantoro, Bibianus Hengki. “Kebijakan Integral Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Melalui Asset Recovery.” Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, 2014.
Yandwiputra, Ade Ridwan. “ICW Catat Sepanjang 2023 Ada 791 Kasus Korupsi, Meningkat Singnifikan 5 Tahun Terakhir.” Tempo.co, 2024. https://www.tempo.co/hukum/icw-catat-sepanjang-2023-ada-791-kasus-korupsi-meningkat-singnifikan-5-tahun-terakhir-57431.
Copyright (c) 2026 Ericha Cahyo Maryono, Shinta Hadiyantina, Bambang Sugiri (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright in each article belongs to the author, as well as the right to patent.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- Authors have the right to self-archiving of the article (Author Self-Archiving Policy)
