Perlindungan Hukum pada Debitur atas Penarikan Objek Jaminan Fidusia melalui Parate Eksekusi

  • Budi Junaedi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura
  • Merry Tjoanda Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura
  • Teng Berlianty Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura
Keywords: Legal Protection, Debtor, Execution Parate

Abstract

Introduction: The arrangement for the execution of fiduciary guarantees as explained in the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 2/PUU-XIX/2021 requires the execution of a fiduciary guarantee certificate which is carried out and applies the same as the execution of court decisions which have permanent legal force.

Purposes of the Research: This study aims to find out how the procedure for withdrawing fiduciary guarantees is through the execution parate, and what forms of legal protection are given to debtors for the withdrawal of fiduciary guarantees through the execution parate.

Methods of the Research: This study uses a normative legal research method, which aims to determine the procedure for withdrawing fiduciary guarantees through the execution parate, and how the form of legal protection is given to debtors for the withdrawal of fiduciary guarantees through the execution parate.

Results Originality of the Research: Legal protection for debtors for the withdrawal of the object of fiduciary security is strengthened through the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 2/PUU-X1X/2021. The decision regulates the existence of an agreement or voluntary surrender of the object of fiduciary security from the debtor to the creditor without any act of unilateral control of the object of guarantee by the creditor. On the other hand, if there is no agreement or voluntary surrender, then new control can be carried out with the knowledge of the court

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jurnal

Alizon, Joni. “Rekontruksi Pelaksanaan Ekseskusi Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019.” Eksekusi: Journal Of Law 2, no. 1 (2020): 58–82.

Faiz, Pan Mohamad. “Teori Keadilan John Rawls.” Jurnal Konstitusi 6, no. 1 (2009): 135–49.

Buku

Fuady, Munir. Hukum Pembiayaan (Dalam Teori Dan Praktek). Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2002.

HS, H Halim, and Erlies Septiana. Penerapan Teori Hukum Pada Penelitian Tesis Dan Disertasi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2013.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum,. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2009.

Muhammad, Abdulkadir, and Rilda Muniarti. Segi Hukum Lembaga Keuangan Dan Pembiayaan. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000.

Patrik, Purwahid. Asas-Asas Itikad Baik Dan Kepatutan Dalam Perjanjian. Semarang: Badan Penerbit UNDIP, 1986.

Prodjodikoro, Wirjono. Asas-Asas Hukum Perdata. Bandung: Sumur, 1983.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000.

Sofwan, Sri Soedewi Masjchun. Beberapa Masalah Pelaksanaan Lembaga Jaminan Khususnya Fiducia Di Dalam Praktek Dan Pelaksanaannya Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 1977.

Subekti. “Pelaksanaan Perikatan, Eksekusi Riil Dan Uang Paksa, Dalam: Penemuan Hukum Dan Pemecahan Masalah Hukum.” Jakarta, 1990.

Sunaryo. Hukum Lembaga Pembiayaan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2009.

Sutarno. Aspek-Aspek Hukum Perkreditan Pada Bank. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2004.

Usman, Rachmadi. Hukum Jaminan Keperdataan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2008.

Published
2022-08-18
How to Cite
Junaedi, Budi, Merry Tjoanda, and Teng Berlianty. 2022. “Perlindungan Hukum Pada Debitur Atas Penarikan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Melalui Parate Eksekusi”. PATTIMURA Legal Journal 1 (2), 124-32. https://doi.org/10.47268/pela.v1i2.6433.