The Experiences of Safety Among the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Intersex, and Asexual (LGBTQIA) Students at the University of Witwatersrand, South Africa

  • Matshepo Maebana University of the Witwatersrand
  • Constance Matshidiso Lelaka University of Witwatersand
Keywords: Campus Safety, LGBTQIA Students, Qualitative Research, Social Discrimination, University Inclusivity

Abstract

Discrimination, prejudice, and hate crimes against members of the LGBTQIA community remain prevalent. As a minority group, LGBTQIA individuals continue to face numerous challenges, despite university policies that describe the campus environment as inclusive. This study adopted a qualitative research approach, with data collected through face-to-face semi-structured interviews. Purposive sampling was used to select participants, and the data were analysed thematically. The findings reveal that members of the LGBTQIA community experience significant safety concerns and do not perceive the university as LGBTQIA-friendly. Five themes emerged from the analysis: understanding of LGBTQIA terminology, perceptions of safety among LGBTQIA students, concerns regarding safe spaces in university residences, lack of a supportive environment, and the various challenges faced by LGBTQIA students. This study contributes to existing knowledge by providing a foundation for further research, informing and strengthening inclusive interventions and policies, and supporting LGBTQIA advocacy efforts aimed at creating safer environments that promote the well-being and rights of the LGBTQIA community.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abaver, D. T., & Cishe, E. N. (2018). Violence, abuse and discrimination: key factors militating against control of HIV/AIDS among the LGBTI sector. SAHARA-J: Journal of Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS, 15(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/17290376.2018.1492960

Achari, N. A. (2022). Contemporary problems faced by the LGBTQ+ people: Comparative study of Asia and North America. Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research, 1–14.

Adler, R. H. (2022). Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research. Journal of Human Lactation, 38(4), 598–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344221116620

Always, P. (2023). The importance of LGBTQ empowerment: Why it matters and how to achieve. https://pridealways.us/blogs/the-collective-pride/the-importance-of-lgbtq-empowerment-why-it-matters-and-how-to-achieve-it

Aversa, I., Coleman, T., Travers, R., Coulombe, S., Wilson, C., Woodford, M. R., Davis, C., Burchell, D., & Schmid, E. (2022). “I’m Always Worried”: Exploring Perceptions of Safety and Community Inclusion Among Transgender People. International Journal of Community Well-Being, 5(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-021-00123-9

Babbie, E. R. (2016). The practice of social research (14th ed.). Wadsworth/Cengage Learning.

Banerjee, A., & Chaudhury, S. (2010). Statistics without tears: Populations and samples. Industrial Psychiatry Journal, 19(1), 60–65.

Barrow, J. M., Brannan, G. D., & Khandhar, P. B. (2020). Research ethics. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29083578/

Barsky, A. (2015). DSM 5 and the ethics of diagnosis. The New Social Worker, 4–5.

Berndt, A. E. (2020). Sampling Methods. Journal of Human Lactation, 36(2), 224–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334420906850

Bloomfield, J., & Fisher, M. (2019). Quantitative research design. Journal of the Australasian Rehabilitation Nurses’ Association, 22(2), 27–30. https://doi.org/10.33235/jarna.22.2.27-30

Cacciattolo, M. (2015). Ethical Considerations in Research. In The Praxis of English Language Teaching and Learning (PELT) (pp. 61–79). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-112-0_4

Campbell, K., Orr, E., Durepos, P., Nguyen, L., Li, L., Whitmore, C., Gehrke, P., Graham, L., & Jack, S. (2021). Reflexive thematic analysis for applied qualitative health research. The Qualitative Report, 26(6). https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4851

Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613

Coley, J. S., & Das, D. (2020). Creating Safe Spaces: Opportunities, Resources, and LGBTQ Student Groups at U.S. Colleges and Universities. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 6(12), 234–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023120971472

Coman, A. (2013). Scope, limitations, and delimitations. Academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/6054602/SCOPE_LIMITATIONS_and_DELIMITATIONS

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. PT. Pustaka Pelajar.

Davis, J. L., Love, T. P., & Fares, P. (2019). Collective Social Identity: Synthesizing Identity Theory and Social Identity Theory Using Digital Data. Social Psychology Quarterly, 82(3), 254–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272519851025

Demirden, A. (2021). The critical examination of social identity theory. The Journal of Political Psychology, 1(2). https://www.academia.edu/66916726/The_Critical_Examination_of_Social_Identity_Theory

Dickson, A., Robinson, T., & Brooke-Holland, L. (2021). LGBT+ rights and issues in sub–Saharan Africa. House of Commons Library. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-9408/CBP-9408.pdf

Dixit, P. (2020). Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India: decriminalising India’s sodomy law. The International Journal of Human Rights, 24(8), 1011–1030. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2019.1690465

Harwood, J. (2020). Social Identity Theory. In The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology (1st ed., pp. 1–7). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119011071.iemp0153

Hilton, C. E. (2017). The importance of pretesting questionnaires: a field research example of cognitive pretesting the Exercise referral Quality of Life Scale (ER-QLS). International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1091640

Hwahng, S. J., & Kaufman, M. R. (2024). Global LGBTQ health. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39788-4

Joseph, R. (2020). The theory of empowerment: A critical analysis with the theory evaluation scale. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 30(2), 138–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2019.1660294

Kam, P. K. (2021). Strengthening the empowerment approach in social work practice: An EPS model. Journal of Social Work, 21(3), 329–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017320911348

Katz, I. (2019). Understanding the contemporary character of Braamfontein, Johannesburg. https://open.uct.ac.za/server/api/core/bitstreams/4330b9e6-d8be-424a-b5c5-17594c5e5db1/content

Lee, C., & Ostergard, R. L. J. (2017). Measuring discrimination against LGBTQ people: A cross-national analysis. Human Rights Quarterly, 39(1), 37–72. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/647800/pdf

Mabin, A. (2023). Genders, Sexualities and Cities: A Review of South African Literatures. Social and Health Sciences. https://doi.org/10.25159/2957-3645/13509

Mara, L.-C., Ginieis, M., & Brunet-Icart, I. (2021). Strategies for Coping with LGBT Discrimination at Work: a Systematic Literature Review. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 18(2), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-020-00462-w

Mavhandu-Mudzusi, A. H., & Sandy, P. T. (2017). Human Rights Violation: Its impact on the mental well-being of LGBTI students in a South African rural-based university. South African Journal of Higher Education, 31(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.20853/31-4-892

Moreno, A., Ardila, R., Zervoulis, K., Nel, J. A., Light, E., & Chamberland, L. (2020). Cross-cultural perspectives of LGBTQ psychology from five different countries: current state and recommendations. Psychology & Sexuality, 11(1–2), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2019.1658125

Mthembu, S. (2023). Homosexuality is not Contemporary in South Africa: The Perceptions of Traditional and Religious Leaders towards Homosexuality. African Journal of Gender, Society and Development (Formerly Journal of Gender, Information and Development in Africa), 12(3), 53–77. https://doi.org/10.31920/2634-3622/2023/v12n3a3

Neighmond, P. (2020). Home but not safe: Some LGBTQ young people face rejection from families in lockdown. https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2020/05/17/856090474/home-but-not-safe-some-lgbtq-young-people-face-rejection-from-families-in-lockdo

Ngwenya, L. N. (2021). Negotiating post migration identities: The intersectional experiences of black lesbian immigrants in Johannesburg, South Africa [University of the Witwatersrand]. https://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/server/api/core/bitstreams/d45b45b0-1172-4789-a3b1-8c71c2c993cd/content

Nxumalo, C. T., Luvuno, Z., Chiya, W. H., Ngcobo, S. J., Naidoo, D., Zamudio-Haas, S., & Harris, O. (2023). Designing Implementation Strategies for the Inclusion of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Intersex, Queer, and Allied and Key Populations’ Content in Undergraduate Nursing Curricula in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: Protocol for a Multimethods Research . In JMIR Research Protocols. https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.52250

Nyeck, S. N. (2019). Heretical Falsification and the Challenge of Theorizing LGBT Politics from the South. In The Oxford Handbook of Global LGBT and Sexual Diversity Politics (pp. 364–380). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190673741.013.17

Parmenter, J. G., Galliher, R. V, & Maughan, A. D. A. (2020). An Exploration of LGBTQ+ Community Members’ Positive Perceptions of LGBTQ+ Culture. The Counseling Psychologist, 48(7), 1016–1047. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000020933188

Pieterse, M. (2015). Perverts, Outlaws and Dissidents: (Homo)Sexual Citizenship and Urban Space in Johannesburg. Urban Forum, 26(2), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-014-9247-z

Rahman, M. S. (2016). The Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Methods in Language “Testing and Assessment” Research: A Literature Review. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 102. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n1p102

Roberts, L. L. (2019). Changing worldwide attitudes toward homosexuality: The influence of global and region-specific cultures, 1981–2012. Social Science Research, 80, 114–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.12.003

Rudwick, S., & Fleisch, A. (2011). Defying a myth: A gay sub-culture in contemporary South Africa. Nordic Journal of African Studies, 20(2), 90–111.

Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity Theory and Social Identity Theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224. https://doi.org/10.2307/2695870

Sumbane, G. O., & Makua, N. M. (2023). Exploring the Mental Health Challenges and Coping Behaviour of Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Students at an Institution of Higher Learning. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5), 4420. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054420

The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, (1996).

Turner, S. G., & Maschi, T. M. (2015). Feminist and empowerment theory and social work practice. Journal of Social Work Practice, 29(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2014.941282

Van Heerden, G. (2019). Perspectives of the region from the region: LGBTQ rights in sub-Saharan Africa. https://cisp.cachefly.net/assets/articles/attachments/80669_lgbtq-rights-in-sub-saharan-africa.pdf

Winkler, S. (2021). Media’s Influence on LGBTQ Support Across Africa. British Journal of Political Science, 51(2), 807–826. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712341900019X

Published
2026-01-31
How to Cite
Maebana, M., & Lelaka, C. M. (2026). The Experiences of Safety Among the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Intersex, and Asexual (LGBTQIA) Students at the University of Witwatersrand, South Africa. Baileo: Jurnal Sosial Humaniora, 3(2), 584-597. https://doi.org/10.30598/baileofisipvol3iss2pp584-597
Section
Articles