Copyright Protection Reform for Traditional Cultural Expressions: Confirming the Status and Position of Communities

  • Muhammad Fahrial Amrulla Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia.
  • Afifah Kusumadara Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7167-8044
  • Budi Santoso Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia.
  • Yenny Eta Widyanti Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia. https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2522-9130
Keywords: Traditional Cultural Expressions, Indigenous Peoples, Legal Protection

Abstract

Introduction: Traditional batik motifs are one of the traditional cultural expressions that are the object of intellectual property law protection. The social, cultural, moral, and spiritual values ​​contained in traditional batik motifs are a cultural heritage passed down from generation to generation and are sacred. In Indonesian positive law, protection of traditional cultural expressions is stipulated in the Copyright Law and the Government Regulation on Communal Intellectual Property.

Purposes of the Research:  This research will focus on the review of copyright protection for traditional cultural expressions held by the state. Furthermore, this study will also discuss the importance of implementing FCIP principles in ensuring the involvement of indigenous communities in decision-making.

Methods of the Research: The method used in this study is doctrinal legal research using legislative and conceptual approaches. The collection of legal materials in this study uses a literature study.

Results Main Findings of the Research: Copyright protection for traditional cultural expressions is held by the state. However, in its implementation, the concept of protecting traditional cultural expressions held by the state lacks clear regulations regarding its technicalities and mechanisms. The existence of the state as the holder of copyright degrades the ownership status of traditional cultural expressions by communal communities. The minimal participation of communal communities in decision-making also indicates weaknesses in the legal protection of traditional cultural expressionsThe state's guardianship of copyright over traditional cultural expressions has weaknesses and requires reform by changing the protection mechanism to a legal protection manager by strengthening the application of FCIP principles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ambarwati, Tutik Dwi. “Perancangan Motif Batik Modern Teknik Cap Kertas Dengan Sumber Ide Keraton Kasunanan Surakarta.” Hastagina: Jurnal Kriya Dan Industri Kreatif 2, no. 1 (2022): 67–79. https://doi.org/10.59997/hastagina.v2i01.1458.

Anaya, S James. Indigenous Peoples in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

Bourban, Michel. “Ecological Citizenship.” In Handbook of the Anthropocene. Berlin: Springer, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25910-4_168.

Christiano, Bryan Eduardus. “Urgency of Sui Generis Protection for Indonesia’s Communal Intellectual Property: Stick With Defensive, Shift to Positive, or Hybrid Approach?” Indonesian Law Journal 16, no. 1 (2023): 19–38. https://doi.org/10.33331/ilj.v16i1.126.

Eskak, Edi, and Heru Budi Susanto. “Etika Penerapan Motif Batik Tradisional Dalam Desain Alas Kaki.” Dinamika Kerajinan Dan Batik 38, no. 2 (2021): 173–184. https://dkb.batik.go.id/dkb/article/view/7121.

Geertz, Clifford. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Book, 1973.

Kusrianto, Adi. Batik Filosofi, Motif Dan Kegunaan. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset, 2024.

Kymlicka, Will. Multicultural Citizen Ship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Clarendom Press, 2004.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. 13th ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.

Nugroho, Sigit. “Pengelolaan Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional (EBT) Di Daerah Pasca Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta:(Perpektif Hukum Administrasi Negara).” Society 5, no. 1 (2017): 87–98. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v5i1.22.

Oseitutu, J Janewa. “A Sui Generis Regime For Traditional Knowledge: The Cultural Divide in Intellectual Property Law.” Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review 15, no. 1 (2011): 148–215.

Prasetyo, Anindito. Batik: Karya Agung Warisan Budaya Dunia. Yogyakarta: Pura Pustaka, 2010.

Putra, Raden Zulfikar Supinarko. “Upaya Pemerintah Terhadap Perlindungan Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Batik Motif Parang Sebagai Warisan Budaya Dunia.” Dharmasisya: Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUIurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI 1, no. 4 (2021): 2207–18. https://doi.org/https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/dharmasisya/vol1/iss4/40/.

Ramadhan, Muhammad Citra, Fitri Yanni Dewi Siregar, and Bagus Firman Wibowo. Buku Ajar Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. Medan: Universitas Medan Area, 2023.

Saidin, OK. Aspek Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (Intellectual Property Rights). Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2019.

Saly, Jeane Neltje, Majolica Ocarina Fae, Lamsiur Kinanti, and Gracia Gracia. “Akselerasi Hukum Adat: Penerapan Prinsip Free, Prior, Informed Consent (FPIC) Bagi Masyarakat Adat.” Yustitiabelen 10, no. 2 (2024): 14-26. https://doi.org/10.36563/yustitiabelen.v10i1.923.

Sulasiah. “Islam Dan Identitas Budaya Pada Motif Batik Banten.” Fakultas Adab dan Humaniora Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, 2024.

Syahrani, Nabila. “Free, Prior Dan Informed Consent Untuk Jaminan Tenurial Dalam Areal Preservasi.” PUSKAPSI Law Review 5, no. 2 (2025): 418–39. https://puskapsi.journal.unej.ac.id/article/view/53788/.

Tobin, Brendan M. “Bridging the Nagoya Compliance Gap: The Fundamental Role of Customary Law in Protection of Indigenous Peoples’ Resources and Knowledge Rights.” Law Environment and Development Journal 9, no. 2 (2013): 142–162.

Widyanti, Yenny Eta. “Perlindungan Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Indonesia Dalam Sistem Yang Sui Generis.” Arena Hukum 13, no. 3 (2020): 388–415. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2020.01303.1.

———. “The Legal Instrument of Protecting Traditional Cultural Expressions Ownership in Intellectual Property Rights Law.” Technium Social Sciences Journal 21 (2021): 492–501. https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/3764.

Wilson, Kennedy. “Unprotected Heritage: The Inadequate Safeguarding of Traditional Knowledge and Cultural Expressions under Intellectual Property Law and the TRIPS Agreement.” The International Law Review Association: Online Forum 3, no. 1 (2024): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.25172/ilrasf.3.1.4.

Published
2026-04-30
How to Cite
Amrulla, Muhammad, Afifah Kusumadara, Budi Santoso, and Yenny Widyanti. 2026. “Copyright Protection Reform for Traditional Cultural Expressions: Confirming the Status and Position of Communities”. PATTIMURA Legal Journal 5 (1), 20-34. https://doi.org/10.47268/pela.v5i1.23348.