PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TAI DAN STAD PADA MATERI GERAK TUMBUHAN PADA SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI 3 NAMROLE

  • Maria Natalia Seleky
  • M Nur Matdoan
  • Ine Arini
Keywords: TAI and STAD models, quasi experiment learning outcomes

Abstract

Background: The TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) model is individual assistance in the characteristic group that the responsibility is for students. Therefore students must build knowledge without accepting the finished form of the teacher. While the STAD Model (Student Team Achievement Division) is to motivate students to be able to support and help one another in mastering the abilities taught by the teacher.

Method: This research was conducted on April 10, 2017 - May 10, 2017 with the research location on Junior High School 3 Namrole. To find out the difference in learning outcomes, it was analyzed using T-test analysis.

Results: Through the design of quasi-experimental research shows that there are no differences in student learning outcomes taught using the TAI and STAD models, but in the TAI and STAD classes almost all students reach KKM 68. However, based on the calculation of the average (mean) and standard deviation for the class TAI 76.68 and class 75.31 so that it can be said that the TAI model is more effective than STAD.

Conclusion: There is an increase in student learning outcomes after conducting the teaching and learning process by using the Team Assisted Individualization and Student Team Achievemint Devision models so that the t-test results show that thit <ttab with thit 1.023 and ttab 2.0105.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Djamarah,Syaiful Bahri & Aswan Zein. (2013). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Endang Mulyatiningsih. (2012). Metode Penelitian Terapan Bidang Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta
Murtadlo. 2005. Peningkatan Prestasi Belajar Siswa Berkesulitan Belajar Membaca Menulis Melalui Pendekatan Kooperatif Tipe TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) di SD: Jurnal Pndidikan Dasar, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2005.
Nur, M. 2003. Panduan Keterampilan Proses dan Hakekat Sains. Surabaya: University Press.
Suprijono, 2009. Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif. Depdiknas. Jakarta
Slavin, R. E. (2014). Cooperative Learning Teori, Riset dan Praktik. Bandung: Nusa Media.
Sudjana, 2004. Penelitian dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Bandung: Sinar Baru
Sukmadinata, 2004. Landasan Psikologi Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Roosdakarya
Trianyanto Ardi (2013). Studi Komparasi Metode Pembelajaran STAD dan TAI Dilengkapi LKS terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa Kelas XI pada MateriTermodinamika di SMA Negeri 8 Surakarta Tahun Pelajaran 2012/2013. Jurnal. Surakarta: UNS
Tuwankotta, 2010.Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Poei Dalam Pencapaian Hasil belajar konsep Hewan Invetebrata Untuk Siswa Kelas X SMA PGRI 1 Ambon.Skripsi (Tidak dipubikasikan). Fakultas KIP: Universitas Pattimura.
Published
2017-10-07
How to Cite
Seleky, M., Matdoan, M., & Arini, I. (2017). PERBEDAAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TAI DAN STAD PADA MATERI GERAK TUMBUHAN PADA SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI 3 NAMROLE. BIOPENDIX: Jurnal Biologi, Pendidikan Dan Terapan, 4(1), 48-55. https://doi.org/10.30598/biopendixvol4issue1page48-55

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 > >>