THE UNDERSTANDING OF MEANING IN LITERARY LEARNING THROUGH SCIENTIFIC APPROACH
Abstract
The works of literature greatly contribute to a nation's characteristics and personality. Understanding a literary work means being able to grasp moral values ​​or messages that are useful for social life. However, understanding a literary text is not as easy as understanding a non-literary text. The main reason is that the literary text bound to several forming conventions such as the language convention, literature, and cultural conventions. To understand this, students must be trained through education and teaching. Literary learning which can produce a good understanding should prioritize the process to familiarize students with the conventions that bind literary works through heuristic and hermeneutic reading. The 2013 curriculum, requires a change in the paradigm of the teacher's thinking towards planning and implementing learning based on a scientific approach. The important point that should be understood by the teachers is literary learning, according to any curriculum, aims to provide literary knowledge understanding and appreciation to the students. It indicates that literary learning should be designed not only to improve literary knowledge but also to express the values that ​​contained. The application of semiotic analysis methods in literary learning including short stories or poetry can be adapted to the steps of teaching based on the scientific approach known as 5 principles, which are observing, questioning, exploring, associating, and communicating/presenting as required by 2013 curriculum. In this context, the expression of the meaning of literary texts is done through observing, reading, repeating, comparing texts (heuristic readings), and continued by exploring and tracing the meaning of texts (hermeneutic readings) and drawing conclusions as a whole
Downloads
References
Alternbernd, Lynn, and Leslie L. Lewis. 1970. A Handbook for the Study of Poetry. London: The Macmillan Company
Bloom, Benjamin, S. 1981. Taxonomy of Educational Objektives: Cognitive Domain. New York: Longman.
Gani, Rizanur. 1986. Pengajaran Sastra Indonesia Respons dan Analisis. Jakarta, Dian Dinamika Press
Harmer, Jeremy. 2001. The Practice of English Language Teaching. Harlow: Longman.
Hill, Knox, C. 1966. Interpreting Literature. Chicago: Chicago University Press,
http://www.ase.org.uk/documents/principles-and-big-ideas-of-science-education
Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Menengah
Direktorat PSMA. 2013. Pembelajaran Berbasis Kompetensi Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Melalui Pendekatan Saintifik.
Moody, H., L., B., 1971. The Teaching of Literature with Special Reference to Developing Countries. London: Longman Group LTD.
Noth, Winfried. 1990. Handbook of Semiotics. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Nunan, David. 1982. Mengembangkan Pemahaman Wacana Teori dan Praktek. Terjemahan Elly, W., Silangen. Jakarta: PT. Rebia Indah Perkasa.
Nurgiyantoro, Burhan. 2002. Teori Pengkajian Fiksi. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press
Palmer, Richard, E. 2003. Hermeneutika Teori Baru Untuk Interpretasi, terjemahan Musnur Hery dan Damanhury Muhammed. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Pustaka Pelajar,
Permendikbud No.69 Tahun 2013 tentang Kerangka Dasar dan Struktur Kurikulum Sekolah Menengah Atas/Madrasah Aliyah.
Riffaterre, Michael. 1984. Semiotics of Poetry. Bloomington-London: Indiana University Press
Reaske, Russel, Christopher. 1966. How to Analyze Poetry. New York: Simon & Schuster Inc.
Suminto. Makalah pada Seminar Nasional Pembelajaran Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia dalam Kurikulum 2013, di Pascasarjana UNS, Solo, Jawa Tengah, Senin (15/7/2013).
Teeuw, A. 1984. Sastra dan Ilmu Sastra. Pengantar Teori Sastra. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya
------------- Membaca dan Menilai Sastra. Jakarta: PT.Gramedia, 1991 UU No 20 tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional (lembar Negara RI tahun 2003 No. 78, Tambahan lembar Negara RI No. 4301),
Werlich, Egon. Praktische Methodik des Fremdspracheunterricht mit Autentischen Texten. Berlin: Cornelsen, 1986.
Young, Jolee. And Elaine Chapman (2010). Generic Competency Frameworks: a Brief Historical
Overview. Education Research and Perspectives, Vol.37. No.1. The University of Western Australia. Z
Copyright (c) 2020 JURNAL TAHURI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Dilarang menjiplak atau memperbanyak naskah untuk kepentingan apapun juga, terima kasih