EVALUASI KELAYAKAN FINANSIAL USAHA BUDIDAYA RUMPUT LAUT MUSIMAN DAN KONTINYU DI KECAMATAN PASIKOLAGA KABUPATEN MUNA

La Ode Muhammad Iksan Yusuf; Ahyar Ismail; Nuva Nuva; Edwin Basmar; Jhohan Jhohan

doi:10.30598/papalele.2026.10.1.1

La Ode Muhammad Iksan Yusuf Universitas Negeri Makassar https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2530-7028
Ahyar Ismail Ekonomi Sumberdaya dan Lingkungan, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Manajemen, Institut Pertanian Bogor
Nuva Nuva Ekonomi Sumberdaya dan Lingkungan Fakultas Ekonomi dan Manajemen Institut Pertanian Bogor
Edwin Basmar Ekonomi Pembangunan Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Negeri Makassar
Jhohan Jhohan Budidaya Perikanan Fakultas Perikanan dan Ilmu Kelautan Universitas Papua

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30598/papalele.2026.10.1.1

Keywords: rumput laut budidaya musiman budidaya kontinyu kelayakan finansial

Abstract

Rumput laut merupakan komoditas unggulan yang berperan penting dalam meningkatkan pendapatan masyarakat pesisir. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menanamkan kelayakan finansial usaha budidaya rumput laut musiman dan kontinyu di Kecamatan Pasikolaga Kabupaten Muna. Metode yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kuantitatif dengan teknik pengambilan sampel simple random sampling , menggunakan rumus Slovin untuk menentukan 86 responden dari total 608 petani. Analisis dilakukan terhadap total biaya, total penerimaan, dan pendapatan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa rata-rata pendapatan pembudidaya rumput laut kontinyu sebesar Rp 4.626.690 per bulan dan musiman sebesar Rp 3.942.167 per bulan, keduanya berada di atas Upah Minimum Regional Kabupaten Muna Tahun 2025 yaitu Rp 3.073.551. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa kedua pola budidaya tergolong layak secara finansial dan memberikan kontribusi positif terhadap kesejahteraan pembudidaya. Penelitian merekomendasikan perlunya dukungan pemerintah daerah dalam penyediaan modal, pembinaan kelembagaan, dan pengelolaan lingkungan budidaya yang berkelanjutan.

Kata kunci: rumput laut, budidaya musiman, budidaya kontinyu, kelayakan finansial, pendapatan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adhawati, S. S., Nurdin, N., Azis, H. Y., Badraeni, Rustam, Akbar, M., & Aris, A. (2024). Status of seaweed (Kappaphycus Alvarezii) farming land ownership and business productivity in Sulawesi Island: quantitative study. Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 27(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.47853/FAS.2024.e5.

Amponsah, L., Chuck, C., & Parsons, S. (2024). Life cycle assessment of seaweed cultivation and harvesting in Europe and the United States. Sustainability Science and Technology, 1(1), 012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2977-3504/ad6ce0.

Antowijoyo, T., Prihatiningrum, R. Y., Yuliyanto, Y., Swandari, F., & Mangkurat, F. P. U. L. (2017). Kelayakan usaha budidaya rumput laut. Jurnal Wawasan Manajemen, 5(1), 73–88. https://jwm.ulm.ac.id/id/index.php/jwm/article/view/115/108.

BPK SULTRA. (2025). 22.2-UMP-dan-UMSP-Sultra-Tahun-2025-Ditetapkan. 1, 2024–2025.

BPS Kabupaten Muna Dalam Angka. (2024). Kecamatan Pasikolaga Dalam Angka. Badan Pusat Statistik.

Canvin, M. C., Borrero‐Santiago, A. R., Brook, T., Gupta, M., Knoop, J., Menage, G., Moore, P. J., O’Connor, N. E., Ricart, A. M., & Smale, D. A. (2025). Can the Emerging European Seaweed Industry Contribute to Climate Change Mitigation by Enhancing Carbon Sequestration? Reviews in Aquaculture, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.70004.

Dineshkumar, R., Veeragurunathan, V., & Mantri, V. A. (2024). An economic and profitability assessment between agarophytes and Kappaphycus alvarezii farming in India. Aquaculture International, 32(6), 7953–7972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-024-01549-6.

FAO 2018. (2018). The global status of seaweed production, trade and utilization. FAO Globefish Research Programme, 124, 120.

Fraser, J. G. and D. M. (2025). Wi l ess c n r o de t as ke l p fa r m scoping study part 1 report literature review. July. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jann-Gilbert/publication/393849980_PART_1_REPORT_LITERATURE_REVIEW_SCOPING_STUDY/links/687dabec4f72461c714f8c24/PART-1-REPORT-LITERATURE-REVIEW-SCOPING-STUDY.pdf.

Hedberg, N., von Schreeb, K., Charisiadou, S., Jiddawi, N. S., Tedengren, M., & Nordlund, L. M. (2018). Habitat preference for seaweed farming – A case study from Zanzibar, Tanzania. Ocean & Coastal Management, 154, 186–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.01.016.

Kalasariya, H. S., & Pereira, L. (2025). Role of Seaweed as a Functional Ingredients in Nutraceuticals, Pharmaceuticals, Cosmetics, and Edible Salts. In Recent Advances in Seaweed Biotechnology (pp. 347–390). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-0519-4_14Lina

Wati, A. L. & Primasyanto. M. (2018). Ekonomi Produksi Perikanan dan Kelautan Modern: Teori dan Aplikasinya. UB Press.

Liu, C., Gao, J., Jiang, H., Sun, J., Gao, X., & Mao, X. (2024). Value‐added utilization technologies for seaweed processing waste in a circular economy: Developing a sustainable modern seaweed industry. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 23(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.70027

Liu, M., & Liu, H. (2024). The Influence and Mechanism of Digital Village Construction on the Urban–Rural Income Gap under the Goal of Common Prosperity. Agriculture, 14(5), 775. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14050775.

Noor, S., & Tajik, O. (2011). Simple Random Sampling. Sampling of Populations: Methods and Applications: 1 (November), 43–81.

Pratiwi, S. R., & Romadona, B. (2025). Pengembangan Teknologi Pasca Panen Rumput Laut Berkelanjutan : Analisis Kinerja dan Kelayakan Ekonomi. 13(1), 157–168.

Radulovich, R., Umanzor, S., Cabrera, R., & Mata, R. (2015). Tropical seaweeds for human food, their cultivation and its effect on biodiversity enrichment. Aquaculture, 436, 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.10.032.

Ross, F. W. R., Malerba, M. E., & Macreadie, P. I. (2025). Global potential for seaweed aquaculture on existing offshore infrastructure. Heliyon, 11(1), e41248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41248.

Sarma, H. H., Borah, S. K., Dutta, N., Sultana, N., Nath, H., & Das, B. C. (2024). Innovative Approaches for Climate-Resilient Farming: Strategies against Environmental Shifts and Climate Change. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 14(9), 217–241. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2024/v14i94407.

Sharma, A., Dubey, S., Singh, K., Mittal, R., Quille, P., & Rajauria, G. (2025). Innovative Processing and Industrial Applications of Seaweed. Phycology, 5(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/phycology5010010.

Soekartawi. 2006. Analisis Usahatani. Jakarta: UI Press.

Suratiyah. 2008. Ilmu Usahatani. Edisi Revisi. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta Timur.

Sofiyanti, J. (2025). Analisis Strategi Peningkatan Ekspor Rumput Laut Indonesia di Pasar Global. AKSIOMA : Jurnal Sains Ekonomi Dan Edukasi, 2(2), 606–613. https://doi.org/10.62335/aksioma.v2i2.919.

Sukrin, Mokodompit, E. A., & Malik, A. (2025). Budidaya Rumput Laut sebagai Sumber Pendapatan Masyarakat Wilayah Pesisir. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Sosial Humaniora (JIMSH), 7(1), 92–105. https://doi.org/10.51454/jimsh.v7i1.933.

Tersiana, A. (2018). Metode penelitian. Anak Hebat Indonesia.

Yadav, D. S., Alichen, A., Bhagiya, B. K., & Mantri, V. A. (2025). Analysis of Three-Decade Change in Global Seaweed Statistics Revealed Its Emergence as a Major Aquaculture Commodity. In Biotechnological Interventions to Aid Commercial Seaweed Farming (pp. 3–18). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-9427-0_1.

Yusuf, L. O. M. I., Ismail, A., & Nuva, N. (2023). Evaluasi Status Keberlanjutan Budidaya Rumput Laut Di Kecamatan Pasikolaga Kabupaten Muna (Pendekatan Rapfish- Multi Dimensional Scaling). Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan, 21(1), 150–158. https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.21.1.150-158.

Zhu, Y., Wang, N., Wu, Z., Chen, S., Luo, J., Christakos, G., & Wu, J. (2025). The Role of Seaweed Cultivation in Integrated Multi‐Trophic Aquaculture: The Current Status and Challenges. Reviews in Aquaculture, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.70042.