Conflict of Interest

PAPALELE: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Ekonomi Perikanan dan Kelautan follows ethical guidelines for journal publication based on Elsevier policies, COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors, and Regulation of the Head of LIPI Number 5 of 2014 concerning the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publications.

 

Authors. All authors must disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of the work, and all sources of financial support for the project must be disclosed. Examples of potential conflicts of interest include employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications or registrations, and grants or other funding. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest stage possible.

 

Editors. Editors must recuse themselves from considering manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. Editors must not use unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript in their own research without the express written consent of the author, and must keep privileged information obtained through peer review confidential. Editors require all contributors to disclose relevant competing interests, and corrections are published if competing interests are revealed after publication. Where needed, other appropriate action, such as a retraction or an expression of concern, may be taken.

 

Reviewers. Reviewers must not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. Reviewers must not use unpublished materials disclosed in a manuscript in their own research without the author’s express written consent, and must not use privileged information obtained through peer review for personal advantage.