IMPLEMENTATION WORKED EXAMPLE-BASED LEARNING TO IMPROVE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS' MATHEMATICAL REPRESENTATION ABILITY

  • Zuli Nuraeni Sriwijaya University
  • Ruth Helen Simarmata Sriwijaya University
  • Angelina Hosana Zefany Tarigan Sriwijaya University
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30598/jupitekvol6iss1pp36-41
Keywords: worked example-based learning, mathematics representation

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to apply worked example-based learning as an effort to improve the representation ability of junior high school students. This research is a quasi-experiment study with a non-equivalent control group design. The population in this study were all students of class VIII SMP Negeri 1 Talang Kelapa, Banyuasin, South of Sumatera, with a purposive sampling technique taken two classes as the sample. Samples on select from is student in class VIII.3 were used as experiment class, and class VIII.4 used as a control class. The instrument that used in this research is a mathematical representation test. The validation of this instrument was carried out by an expert review. Analysis the data using t-test with independent samples test. From the results of data analysis show the average final ability of students' mathematical representations in the experimental class was the same as the average final ability of students in the control class with Asymp.Sig (1-tailed) = 0.086. But, the average value of the post-test in the experimental class was 60, and the average value of the post-test in the control class was 53.13. Its meaning that the average test score of students' mathematical representation abilities in the experimental class was higher than the average ability test score mathematical representation of students in the control class

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agustina, T. B., & Sumartini, T. S. (2021). Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa melalui Model STAD dan TPS. Plus Minus, Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika., 1(2), 315–326. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v1i2.1264

Al-Baqie, A. F. A. (2018). Pengembangan Buku Ajar Aljabar Dengan Menggunakan Worked Example. Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel.

Armadan, Somakim, & Indaryanti. (2017). Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Berbasis Teori Van Hiele di Materi Segiempat Kelas VII SMP Negeri 1 Indralaya Utara. Jurnal Elemen, 3(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/http://e-journal.hamzanwadi.ac.id/index.php/jel/article/download/306/pdf_53

Atkinson, R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D. (2018). Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research, 70, 181–214. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070002181

Chambers, P. (2008). Teaching Mathematics: developing as a self active secondary teacher. SAGE Publication Inc.

Handayani, H. E. P., & Nuraeni, Z. (2020). Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematis Dengan Pendekatan Worked Example. Lentera Sriwijaya : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.36706/jls.v2i1.9859

Irwansyah, M., & Retnowati, E. (2019). Efektivitas worked example dengan strategi pengelompokan siswa ditinjau dari kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan cognitive load. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 62–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v6i1.21452.

Mahpudin, A., Rosyid, A., Nuraeni, Z., Suparman, & Andriyani. (2020). Validity of an android-based mathematic equation editor product. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(1), 1102–1106.

Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 226–232. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_4.

Muryanto, D. (2020). Efektivitas Worked Example Pairs Pada Pembelajaran Daerah Penyelesaian Sistem Pertidaksamaan Linear Dua Variabel. EDUMAT. Jurnal Edukasi Matematika, 11(2).

Noorfitriani, I., & Rosyid, A. (2020). Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematis Siswa Menggunakan Worked Example. Mathline, Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 26–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31943/mathline.v5i1.127.

Nuraeni, Z., Indaryanti, I., & Sukmaningthias, N. (2021). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Bercirikan CTL Berbantuan GeoGebra Menggunakan Model Flipped Learning. Jurnal Elemen, 7(1), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v7i1.2723

Nuraeni, Z., Rosyid, A., Mahpudin, A., Suparman, & Andriyani. (2020). Development of an android-based math equation editor. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1480(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1480/1/012013

Nurhamidah, A. S., & Nuraeni, Z. (2018). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran SAVI (Somantic, Auditory, Visualization, Intellectually) Terhadap Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa. Jurnal Matematika Ilmiah STKIP Muhammadiyah Kuningan, 4(2), 10–24.

Retnowati, E. (2012). Worked Examples in Mathematics. Proceedings 2nd International STEM in Education Conference Worked, 393–395.

Ruseffendi. (2005). Dasar-dasar Penelitian Pendidikan & Bidang Non-eksakta Lainnya. Tarsito.

Santosa, C. A. H. F., Rafianti, I., & Yulistiany, D. (2022). Worked-Example Method on Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability in term of Students’ Initial Ability. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 13(2), 210–220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v13i2.33301

Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2012). Cognitive load theory: explorations in the learning science, instructional systems and performance technologies. Springer.

Published
2023-06-29
How to Cite
Nuraeni, Z., Simarmata, R., & Tarigan, A. (2023). IMPLEMENTATION WORKED EXAMPLE-BASED LEARNING TO IMPROVE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ MATHEMATICAL REPRESENTATION ABILITY. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (JUPITEK), 6(1), 36-41. https://doi.org/10.30598/jupitekvol6iss1pp36-41
Issue
Vol 6 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (JUPITEK)
Section
Articles

Copyright (c) 2023 Zuli Nuraeni, Ruth Helen Simarmata, Angelina Hosana Zefany Tarigan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

License and Copyright Agreement

In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read  Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (Jupitek) Posting Your Article Policy.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

Copyright

Authors who publish with Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (Jupitek) agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.